Verdict in this is being read at 8pm apparently. Someone's about to lose a lot of money.
What age are you! Edward Scissorhands is a childhood classic!
Amber Turd heheheheheh
it is very rare that I agree with Fox News let alone “Judge Jeanine” but all the other media outlets seemed to feel obligated to support Amber because she is female.
The take away from it is that she had fabricated lies abuse allegations. This will not be beneficial for any actual abuse victims, who will be seen with suspicion by those who want to use this trial to support their views.
And the general condemnation of disorders that people think they have grasped but which they genuinely don’t understand.
With regards to gender debates: both sides on the extreme spectrum will be using this for publicity.
As I said: I can’t see much good having come from this.
how's that hangover today ?
Because it's a win for social change regarding the position of males in society. Now, there's a greater chance that men will come forward with their claims of abuse, knowing that there's a greater possibility that their own claims won't be dismissed out of hand, and lastly, that society/justice might start seeing the female in a relationship as being more responsible for being the aggressor in a variety of circumstances. After all, in most Justice systems women still get punished less than men for doing the same crimes, often with excuses/justifications being found that wouldn't be sought for the male.
Cases like these bring us closer to an honest society, where the female gender isn't protected so much at the expense of the male gender.
So, I'm rejoicing because this high profile case adds some cracks to the systems that discriminate so much based on gender.
didnt follow the US case but she must been the most unconvincing witness of all time given the stuff Depp owned up re ,texts, substance abuse etc.
Where and how has it caused damage?
I think people are relieved to see that a verdict that aligned with facts presented was reached instead of a verdict based on their gender/politics
This case has caused more damage than it did good to anyone so I’m not sure why everyone is rejoicing so much.
Amazed the doubling down on her lies by publishing that statement.
And the amount of people supporting her, just shows how tribal it is , even when proved innocent in a court of law it doesn't matter to these people, it's all politics with them and they'd want an innocent person punished just because they don't like them politically/gender/etc ... - terrifying.
Like the Rittenhouse case.
Look at this mad yoke
https://twitter.com/anitasarkeesian/status/1532092637460672512?s=20&t=HqOQPvPE_vIpkvcQ8AgBtw
The media really did themselves no favours in this case, especially in the age of the fake news narrative. I would watch the trial and then see news reports that had a very distorted and skewed take on what had actually happened in court.
The guardian are still committed to the narrative that this trial is a triumph for misogyny and that Amber will have a career as a womens rights advocate and domestic abuser spokesperson.
Amber is a sociopath and a liar who hijacked the me too movement to advance her own acting career and ultimately too make money.
All the time, or just when you don't like the verdict?
Ask yourself which is more likely.
Steven Segal movies are her future.
Amber's sister is about as credible a witness as a baguette is a reliable oar. You're really expecting the sister (who Amber also physically and mentally abused) to win any favour in the trial, or anywhere else? The public doesn't like Heard because most of us know what she is.
What I find funny is a hillbilly juror can clearly see what you fail to. And yet you are the one insulting their intelligence. Classy guy. Amber is the abuser, not Johnny. Any appeal will just cost her more of the money she donated [cough] pledged to charity.
He doesn't think that, and even if they did come calling he'd probably tell them to fúck off,
witch hunt? more like getting all the facts out in the open, come what may
Heard also fired her PR firm during the trial as she was looking bad in social media. Show's what she was really caring about.
There has been speculation that the UK court verdict may very well be contested now, as will the Australian court case, as it's been shown Amber perjured herself, in both cases.
As Ms Vasquez has shown (and dear God, her and Ben Chew were amazing) Amber lied about donating money, stating she 'pledged' it. Pledging is fine, but she never donated it. She stated this at the UK trial, that she had donated the money. Quite a few of Heard's witnesses never stepped up to speak on her behalf, one of whom didn't testify on account of Amber punching her in the face.
I immediately knew Heard was lying, the moment she accused Depp. The biggest indicator of character, to me, is 'What has this person done in the past?' (Good or bad). With Depp, he's done a lot of charity work, speaking to kids, visiting hospitals as Capt Jack in order to help alleviate the parent's and child's suffering. Many folks spoke up about how he was kind and patient with children who had learning disabilities, mental handicaps, or were severely autistic. There was also no mentions of him being violent to any previous girlfriend, not just Kate Moss. He even did 'Zoom' meetings with kids during the pandemic.
I looked at instances on films like 'What's eating Gilbert Grape' where Depp apologised to his co-star for things his character had to say. (Gilbert hates his morbidly obese mother for many reasons, the main one being he believes she pushed his father to take his own life.) Between takes, Depp apologised profusely to the actress playing his mother, for the rather nasty things Gilbert would say. This shows a person who's not exactly a 'monster', like they tried to portray him as.
With Heard, there was a lot of stuff in her past she tried to bury, including attacking an ex girlfriend. When the UK trial unearthed how she'd 'stolen' a friends sexual assault story and masqueraded that it 'happened to her'... that showed some seriously disturbing behaviour on her part. As did her alleged 'raped with a bottle' that folks have unearthed (including word for word dialogue from the script) occurs in a movie (I believe it was either Gone Girl, or The Accused). Disturbed individual right there.
The media really behaved disgustingly. From the New York Post editing a photo to make it look like Heard was crying, to posting updates on the case, but only the 'this makes Johnny look bad' parts. (Even when an expert was called and completely slam dunked Heard's evidence).
Folks pushing this as a 'loss' for women... no. No it's not. If anything, it's a win for women. You saw how many, many, many women came out to support Depp. Many of them knew him, personally. They knew he was a flawed individual, but not an abusive one. (The only person he abused, was himself). Calling out an individual who is genuinely remorseless, and abusive... going against the grain. Proving that this 'believe all women' narrative is poisonous. That takes serious strength. And you saw a lot of strong women at this case. Not just Camille Vasquez.
Only came across this clip earlier, it removed any doubt in my mind that she isn't a lying manipulative piece of work, watch to the end. I'm glad they were able to show this in the trial.
You sound like Amber. Everybody that is not Amber is either wrong, stupid or lying.
Now the jurors are hillbillys. The verdict was a slam-dunk.
Scraping the bottom of the barrel now, really.
Amber's sister witnessed him attacking her, he also admitted in UK case he headbutted her, Depp won the case, but lets get real we all know he was abusive to her, verbally, mentally, physically. But the public doesn't like Heard, either did jury, wasn't about what was proven. In an appeal court this verdict will not stand up to the law. 7 hillbilly jurors who couldn't even fill out a verdict form correctly aren't going to change the law of the land. They got it wrong, and in the appeal court a judge will see it clearly.
He abused drink, drugs and kitchen cabinets. Nothing to show he abused Amber. But let's just ignore the facts and cheer #ibelieveher
The UK case was very different and was not against AH, but about what they published and called him. There was no jury and the judge was directly connected with the owner of the newspaper. Hardly a neutral party. The USA case was against AH and the jury saw through her lies and malice. AH is done, finished. She is as good as the crispy gift she left on her marital bed.
Maybe she has found a niche market though. If Gwyneth can sell candles that smell like vaj, Amber can sell ornaments for bed sheets.
I doubt that he does. After all, he's lived for months, even years, under the label of a abuser due to Heard's accusations and disclosures to the media.. before this last trial even started. He's a celeb. He knows and understands the way the public will view him, especially those on the internet, who will swing both ways.
Secondly, what witch hunt? Heard was shown to be verbally and physically abusive in their relationship, along with being manipulative. That's not a witch hunt.. that's revealing his side of the relationship.
Now, I understand you believe Depp to be an awful person. TBH I wouldn't put him up for any prizes for the way he's lived his life, both with or without Heard. However, believing Depp to be a bad person, doesn't mean that you have to work so hard to ignore/dismiss the rather strong evidence that Heard was abusive. Not in reaction to what Depp did, but under her own steam, and by her own choices. Just as both of them have used the media, social media and other forms of public expression to manipulate sympathy with variable success. Heard did really well initially, especially before/during/after the UK trial, and again, just before the US trial, whereas Depp has done extremely well during and after the US trial. Both are manipulators, and neither of them are angels.
I always find these cases interesting because posters seem to assume a particular side, almost unwilling to accept that their side did bad ****. They both did. Neither was completely innocent, but at least now, Heard is no longer the poster child for domestic abuse victims, and claiming society was against her, all the while the media bent over backwards to support her claims.
No. I don’t think anyone believes that. He’s said himself he’d never do another Pirates. He’s more into the independent arty movies and I’d say that he’s still got the pull with audiences that he’d get plenty of opportunities
DOes Depp really believe that everyone will come running back to him, that Disney will be calling tomorrow, ha, no chance, this whole witch hunt orchestrated by him is just more abuse.
Amber Heard is a very dangerous person. She beat up her ex girlfriend, she beat up JD, I wouldn’t be surprised if she is arrested for for domestic violence again in the future.
To accuse someone of raping you with a bottle is horrendous. No medical report, no evidence. Shes a loon. But yeah I'm a "Depp cultist".
😁.
No sense to you, maybe.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/v2/9c6ef39403f5dc93bd4b9e77a11c1821.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/df05300f57fe28ddd3330602c0adbfdb.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/d5a8197d7274f92eab37915a6d9f12a1.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/v2/07abd39dc4f0afde3c391afc78cc920e.svg)
