Didn't the conspiracy theorists say this was on the card's, and they were told they're nuts.
https://youtu.be/KknfRwyckpM
Lol. Why is it impossible for you to explain what you did to verify something?
it's only impossible if you didn't actually verify it.
And no, I wouldn't be happy owning nothing. I wouldn't be happy owning a lot of stuff. My happiness isn't dependant on owning stuff.
It's not a relevant question because the WEF is not trying remove the concept of ownership.
Well it's not going to happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if some TD's would go along with it if it was a proposal.
I remember an old guy who fought in the Irish civil war told me as long as sinn feinn are kept from running the country we'll be ok
He reckoned there would be curfews road blocks and if someone think who's running it now is bad. Well not as one tenth as bad if the shinners got in.
Maybe it would be a more interesting world if our local TDs woke up in the morning gripped by Dr Evil notions of a 1984 style dystopia, hell-bent on "controlling" and "tracking" the populace, all part of a perfect hivemind of other officials all working towards the same nefarious end-goal.
Sadly, I don't think they do. Still, conspiracy theorists keep the dream alive. Any day now.
Absolutely, without a doubt, these people have been on about how to reset everything for years, the variables will never fullfil their dream.
I'd convert to Shia Islam and go to Iran before I'd live in a dystopian western world.
There's no relation between David Icke and reality.
Paedophiles have been around since the year dot, however it's only really in recent decades, through changes in society and other factors that the issue has come more to the forefront, leading to larger investigations and uncovering abuses, e.g. the Catholic church
Conspiracy theorists have utterly nothing to do with that. However they screech endlessly that everyone in power is a paedophile (except for the serial adulterers they like) so when someone actually turns out to be a paedophile they say "we did that". No they didn't.
You're claiming that it's a goal... You should be able to point to some non autocratic governments that are aiming to achieve anything of the sort.
Absolutely no idea in relation to "freedoms" which is a vague term. Eg the introduction of minimum wages could be interpreted as a loss of a freedom. If we're to put a metric on it, freedoms have grown in Ireland in terms of being a more equitable society.
Meanwhile the politicians that tend to push Soros conspiracies etc tend to be the more autocratic politicians. Trump and Orban are coming to mind. Orban actively spent time targeting Soros. Press freedom under Orban went down. We never hear the conspiracy theorists calling out regimes like that...
Elite paedophilia was a David Icke conspiracy theory a decade ago. Now it's just a mundane fact.
Why would mass tracking or depopulating be beyond the ken of someone who rapes young girls in their "private life"? (Or is 'only' close friends with someone who does.)
The facade that Gates is a friendly, well-meaning nerd with business sense - which held good until very recently - is now totally exploded, never to be put back together again.
It isn't a vindication of every madcap conspiracy attributed to Gates but it shows that he is a *completely untrustworthy* person who deserves no benefit of the doubt of any kind, from anyone. He should be universally shunned.
I'm talking about the microchips in the vaccines, tracking humans with barcodes, depopulating the planet, that stuff
Not the private lives of people like Trump or Gates who've had affairs or a relationship with Epstein ;)
Sounds heavenly lol or some moon on Jupiter
you certainly implied it
Do you think we'll have the same freedoms we had for the last 30 year's.
Nobody's taking them away, I mean nobody.
Bill Gates' own wife divorced him because, she said, of his relationship with a procurer of young girls.
Why do you still defend him and feel sympathy for him? Even in the mainstream and among people who know him personally his reputation is permanently trashed for, on the most innocent interpretation, terrible errors of judgement (or possibly much worse).
We should come up with a blog piece about how we'll be living on Mars in the future, owning nothing, eating insects, with a social credit system AND we'll all be chipped
Send it to the WEF, see if some clerk in there absentmindedly retweets it and watch the online Armageddon unfold.
I mean that's how the whole Qanon thing started, surely it's worth a shot..
And then we will have people on this forum asking such gems as "Would you be happy owning nothing on Mars?"
who is taking them away?
Do you trust this man ?
Poor Bill Gates, come on man.
This is Bill Gates
https://youtu.be/jgm455M-N3Y
So if there's no stated goal, are we not going to see a dystopian society ?
No they don't really. It's usually generic stuff about economics, sustainability and so on.
On the other hand conspiracy theorists, cranks, loons, paranoid people and assorted fringes do dump all sorts of nonsense and distortions on internet. On a very regular basis. You only have to look at this forum.
So for example, when some Danish MP had to write some blog about the future, she wrote a little piece about people not owning anything. And that was that. Until the loons found it, and decided it was some blueprint for the future, you can imagine the rest.
Likewise whenever poor Bill Gates does something, anything, there's an entire army of internet fruitcakes who are more than happy to seize on it, distort it, shriek about their creation, and then move onto the next bit of nonsense.
The problem, as always, is not the WEF, or 5G, or Democrats eating pizzas - it's the "enlightened" blob of excitable paranoid people who believe all their own creative writing a little too much.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-wef-idUSKBN2AP2T0
The question is pretty irrelevant though. There was no stated goal of any such thing by the WEF. It was a video dealing in hypotheticals. Man, thought experiments etc must blow your mind entirely....
You never answered my question about owning nothing, there you go again, asking people to do the impossible. No answer is appropriate enough.
Would you be happy owning nothing ?
Lol. Nope. That's not where the quote comes from man.
And notice how you didn't actually answer the question.
You saw some youtube video by some conspiracy nut, decided you liked it and accepted what you were told without question.
So it's about you being right, I suppose we're heading down that route again.
YouTube , I seen it on YouTube.
He did say you'll own nothing and be happy.
You never answered my question.
Would you be happy if you own nothing, and your salary the exact same as someone doing sweet f all.
The middle classes on the same financial security or insecurities as the people on welfare....
One class still has to work, the others have a leisurely lifestyle.
In general I would say that as soon as someone starts making disturbing statements the onus isn't on me to "prove" they aren't joking and that they really mean it, I simply cease to trust that person.
There is no obligation to trust or believe anyone. Trust is earned.
If someone is starting from a position of "I will trust this prominent media-promoted billionaire/politician/celebrity until someone can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are actively motivated to do harm" that's a personal choice they've made to be open to strangers and to accept appearances. Perfectly reasonable in a way but as I said there is no obligation to do this. None at all.
It's not a trick question. You did see it on twitter or some such and then didn't bother to look into it beyond that.
You can't admit that because like all conspiracy theorists, you aren't very honest.
So again, prove me wrong. Tell us what you did to actually see if that was true. How did you look into it?
If you can't or won't say, then I'm right.
Similar to the average person being called useless eaters, or with the help of vaccines etc we can decrease the population....
Idiot's, no wonder the conspiracy theorists are up in arms, and have a point.
That's a trick question, I know what angle you're coming in at now. You'll suggest I seen it on Twitter.
But sadly no, it's not a Twitter thing.
Answer me this please.
Would you be happy by 2030 if you weren't able to own nothing ? And you'll be happy :)
In general the WEF dump alarming and controversial material into the public sphere and they can see that it generates a very bad reaction amongst the general public and they have to row back. Then they do it again, more than once. So a forum of world leaders has no Public Relations strategy? Very odd.
Even on the most innocent interpretation it is a big mistake for a legislator to be spitballing dystopian scenarios.
Apart from anything else the passivity with which this is presented ("hey wouldn't it be bad if people had no property rights?") ignores the fact that such a thing can only come about via legislation. In other words, only the likes of Danish MPs can safeguard or destroy such rights vis a vis Danish citizens. So for a Danish MP to be openly "daydreaming" about this should not receive a sanguine response. It shouldn't be tolerated as it's beyond inappropriate, and obviously it erodes trust.
I'm sure you realise this yourself despite what you say.
Justin Trudeau is a big fan of this kind of culture. He's another Gimp.
There you go you're getting into the spirit of mocking these dinosaurs
They are just living in a fantasy of their land of make believe.
And remember all of the above is actually true. A Danish MP really did write a blog about some future scenario where she envisioned people owning nothing and being happy, and this one woman has more power than you can imagine. Despite all her disclaimers (to paraphrase) "yo mental people this was just a blog", we know this is the new global blueprint. That the economic forum which has been held every year for donkeys is actually a secret totalitarian party with unparalleled powers. That all this is being implemented as we speak. The rations of insects are being stockpiled. The world is already being mapped into zones. The "no ownership of anything allowed" signs are being printed.
And I don't mind so much, I am sure I can be useful in rounding up others to work in their underground artificial meat caves..
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
