What experts point me towards there statements.
They are running out of conscripts...
Oncologists HAVE diagnosed cancer by looking at people on TV.
I recall at least one other on Irish TV.
It would be fascinating to hear what people in Crimea now think of the Putin regime. You'll always have your hate filled Russian nationalists of course, but I'd say a large section of the population may well be disgusted at how the regime has behaved in Ukraine - it must be very uncomfortable for them.
If the Donbass, Crimea etc experience real "Western" democracy & lifestyle they will never want Russia. The key is to make Ukraine a great place to live in.
Yeah - I think the macron needs a bit of rehabilitation... A couple of squadron of rafales ( and missiles ) would go a long way to patching things up .... And better throw in pilot training in France too .. 😁
( I know pie in the sky )
Make Ukraine great again? - but actually mean it and do something.
This is a link to a YouTube segment, I hope the information referenced is accurate -
https://youtu.be/2KQTQiag2ow
Totally.
As we all know, there are many types of cancer, and quite a lot are only discovered by intensive investigation, but one of the easiest to spot and diagnose is skin cancer. So even on TV, its possible to make a pretty accurate diagnosis about that particular cancer, so why not others? The minute you walk into a Doctors surgery, he is already assessing your condition based on your physical appearance and manner. And for sure Putin's present time TV appearances would give medical professionals food for thought.
And in the link above, fortunately for that woman the Dr. noticed a lump on her throat and was a specialist in Ear, Nose and Throat issues, reached out via FB to contact her and tell her it needed biopsy. Turned out to be thyroid cancer. So, Doctors can diagnose even trickier cancers via looking at someone on TV.
Ukrainians in Crimea forced to fight for Russia.
Russia gets off on this thing of population. A million russians were reported to have been moved in to Crimea since 2014. They bullied out the Ukrainians and native Tartars. Took their homes and properties. Since the military took over Kherson above Crimea. The newly installed russian authorities are changing road signs, everything to Russian. More russian people have been brought into Kherson and the russian authorities want to have a breakaway referendum now with their occupation.
That is way off the mark. The US has approximately 5,500 nuclear warheads themselves. France has about 290, the UK about 225. So that is roughly 6,015. So Sailorman was indeed close to the number of nuclear warheads that NATO has.
I certainly hope your right. But a long way to go before that might be on the cards I think.
The oncologist I was quoting in the original tweet said Putin in photos and videos this week looked very much like people he usually sees with terminal cancer (I assume he's factoring in the bloated face look, perhaps indicative of someone taking steroidal treatment).
I take it from your post that your Turkish and your going to point fingers at the EU about being good people. Utterly risible. Especially picking on Finland and Sweden as against Turkey's own defacto authoritarian dictatorship under Erdogan.
Nope both wrong 😑 .
It has nothing to do with the thread...but I am really wondering now what a Turkish nationalist who calls us (in EU) "bad terrorist-supporting people" but perhaps is forced to live among us for some reason really thinks about our crazy lost young generation?
Anyway, it will have benefits even if Erdogan does "it" (probably unlikely) & vetos one or both of their NATO membership applications.
Brings Turkey more fully out from cover in a way, should really boost Greek arguments about EU/EU member states' relations with Turkey (I think maybe these are sidelined at times, similar to some E. European members views on and suspicions of Russia, which finally got proven to be correct in the worst way).
Turkey are being praised for supplying Ukraine with drones in this conflict but from what I can see they've done nothing that actually costs them anything (who ends up paying for those drones...?). They get to damage/weaken Russia for free, can benefit economically if opportunity arises since they are not going to be sanctioning Russia themselves, and they get to test the weapons they are so proud of more thoroughly without danger to themselves or their soldiers.
List of states with nuclear weapons - Wikipedia.
This list shows the numbers I had as being roughly 6,015. So right back at you:)
Either way it really does not matter as both NATO and Russia have way too many nuclear warheads although given the pathetic state of Russian military equipment we have seen recently I highly doubt all their nuclear weapons are functional.
This is a pretty picture that lives here - https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/
Wikipedia is not an accurate source of anything cause anyone can edit things. My list stands.
They are not wrong and neither are the experts who quote the higher number.
Are you familiar with the concept of "retired warheads" ?
So, if they are retired why count them, you ask. - Well, if they're not destroyed, they exist in storage.
Here's a screenshot of a corner of your linked web page:
But only based off estimates rather than actual live weapons and warheads .
So there could well be more or less .
In this case none of you are right 😂
Why? They're only there because Russia/USSR did this exact same thing before except in Crimea. Not talking about 2014 either.
Stalin killed a lot of people. Has any country had a more brutal history then russia?
I'm just glad that I can post my opinion on any political leader in Europe and I know I won't get arrested and imprisoned. That to me should be the very first basic building block of any country that wants to call itself democratic.
Also, I don't think you live in Turkey, because then you would know about the skyrocketing inflation and unhappiness with Erdogan because of it.
scary, the encirclement of the Donbas continues apace
..
NATO only have 100 B61 gravity bombs between NATO members,its included in the US deployed warheads.
US have 5428 nuclear warheads,including reserve stockpiles and retired,but have 1644 deployed and ready warheads
Russia have 5977 nuclear warheads,including reserve stockpile and retired,but have only 1588 deployed and ready warheads
UK have 225 nuclear warheads,inluding reserve stockpile and retired,but only have around 60 deployed and ready warheads
France have 290 nuclear warheads ready and deployed
Anyway its enough warheads around to destroy eachother and our planet probably 100 times
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/e050b53be62f0ae2404c620976170938.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/eedacf599b4135dfd56d6fdbddcbd867.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/282101dc2976956f9dfc87f7a2ef2413.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c635d680d76ce16e490d61f21d7a1353.svg)