Fair play lads. Vouge and Spencer will have serious competition for baby related content.
It’s a donor egg, his sister is the gestational carrier (think that’s the term used), I’d say they did a swirl for the dad side (think again that’s what most do). The baby will have loads of females in their life, he has five sisters and they seem close.
Fair play to the sister, it’s such a massive thing to do especially when she has no children yet of her own and hasn’t gone through pregnancy
I think it would be exceptionally creepy for a sister to giver her biological daughter up to her brother and be addressed as an aunt while the child's uncle is addressed as the father.
But it seems that this isn't the case with this particular pregnancy.
I do think the same for every child - every child should have access to a mother and a father - be it they dont have to live in the same house as them. Yes I am anti adoption when a child is completely cut off from their natural parents. There are lots of sad adopted people out there because they know nothing about their natural parents.
I have nothing against 2 men raising a child together - I just think to be fair to the child they should know their mother also.
You initially said "Gay couples should be allowed to have children but it should be compulsory that the child's biological father/mother should be part of their life in some capacity" so, in the interests of consistency, I'm assuming the 'gay' bit is unnecessary. You mean all patents.
Beyond that, in an ideal world, yes, but....
He bought it from his sister
Kildare?
This is a discussion regarding a gay couple having a baby thats why I referred to Gay couples.
Yeah, I know, but the way you said it sounded homophobic (which I accept it wasn't) and was curious.
It is not just "some article". 🤣
How is His Sister from a poorer country? 😆
Baby stuff is a massive draw when you are in the celebrity likes and clicks industry. Looks like the sister has been hired as part of the family business.
The lads have clearly struck gold given that this thread is 4 pages long.
you need a male and female parent in order to be best brought up , its always been this way , one on its own is inferior , as are two men or two women
sometimes the old ways are simply the best even that really irks progressive doctrine devotees
Except you can't prove this claim and none of the research shows any difference. I would say it's more that you're the one that is irked by the reality.
almost all research in this area is ideologically motivated so Id dismiss that out of hand , few researchers with a different view will stick their neck out for fear of the progressive dogmas that dominate
Yep you'll dismiss it out of hand cause it doesn't suit you.... So basically your entire logic is a gut conclusion rather than based on facts. The research goes back decades on this topic btw so you're dismissing a lot of peer reviewed research because of a silly assumption.
hardly a silly assumption to think progressive ideology dominates research on this topic ?
Children need to be in a loving, caring and responsible environment to be best brought up.
Ideally, that would be with both biological parents, but sadly, often that is not the case.
Idealistic and bullshit.
Plenty of single parents doing great jobs, plenty of nuclear patents letting their kids run wild and wind up.as the subject of "the courts are too lenient on this teenage scrotes' threads here.
You know that as well as I do.
Boy this thread went down hill quickly. Opening up with witty, dismissive insults of attention seeking, immature, empty headed muppets, who announced their private business to the world.
Descending to an analysis of the effect on society of same sex couples parenting.
Boards has gone to the dogs.
top quality response.
i guess that's me debooked.... :rolleyes:
o
Not sure why you quoted me....?
Anyway, I'd argue discussion of the effect on society of sane sex couples parenting (if any) is a valid debate, I world have thought.
These two narcissists aren't indicative of regular same sex couples thankfully.
Hmm. you would think but not really. This is ireland - we have a long tradition of making a routine out of some seriously fúcked up stuff in regard to adoptions, illigitimate children, magdelenes etc.
My cousin, or who I thought was my cousin, turned out to be a cousin once removed. Her "mother" all along was actually her grandmother, and her "sister" was actually her mother. Her "father" is her grandfather. Nobody knows who her actual father is. The suspicion is that it is a Georgie Burgess type of affair.
yeah... thats also creepy
It's a sad state of affairs when kids are used as the latest trendy accessory.
I agree. I understand they might be excited, but why the need to make a media circus around it? Classless, narcissistic and ugly.
Don't be coming in here with your facts and common sense. Don't you know that this thread is only for rank homophobia?
Doesn't affect me in any way but i do find it weird, and really we can't have an open discussion on things like this because you either agree or you are a raving homophobe so the real opinions are never heard. But for the childs sake i hope him or her is loved and taken care of which i'm sure they will be.
I genuinely haven't seen any "rank homophobia" on this thread.
Unless you think it's homophobic to say that two men declaring that "they" are having a baby is a little silly.
If its homophobic to know that two men can't "be having a baby" and transphobic to know that men can't be women, then yeah, I suppose homophobia and transphobia are both rife in the world.
and in biology
1 You clearly didnt read everything that I wrote
2 Of course I am going to laugh at your response because you claimed all of the evidence is "just some article" - Your claim is completely untrue and frankly absurd and hilarious. Theres no substance to it.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://www.boards.ie/applications/dashboard/design/images/banned.png)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
