So the balls-up has started since last night which makes Fairview from clontarf to Edges corner a single lane with bollards down the centre.
This will be a permanent feature and works will take 21 months.
You might want to change the title of the Thread to - Transformative Sustainable Transport project finally starts work.
There will be issues in the first few weeks with people, like yourself, who didn't know it was happening but that will dissipate over the coming weeks as people look at alternative routes and alternative transport modes.
Unfortunately, roadworks don't magically get completed at the snap of a finger - things get temporarily worse for a short period of time before they get better (in this instance, a 1,000 times better!)
Pavlov's cycle lanes..........They're both permanent and have a life span of just under 2 years, apparently.
Nah, balls-up is most suitable....
I already knew about this unsustainable project. For some people, there is no alternative
For some yes - for most no. Should we focus everything on benefitting the few?
It's a very small price to pay for keeping the lycra brigade happy.
And you wouldn't like them when they're unhappy - they ring their bicycle bells very loudly.
By which you mean rat runs and congestion on those routes - cycling and overcrowded buses isn't for everyone, but this anti-motorist agenda (until they are expected to spend a fortune in tax, fuel and insurance that is!) is getting very tiresome.
Dublin is not Amsterdam or wherever you like to compare in Europe where metro systems, integrated public transport options, and the luxury of having had the opportunity of designing these things from the ground up because half the city was flattened in WWII, are the norm and it never will be - especially when we keep pricing people further and further out of the city through housing policies and yet then paradoxically want them to trek back into work every day anyway.
But I know I'm wasting my time here as any non-cycling/PT views are unwanted these days, not just here but in the offices of the "planners" and decision makers.
the luxury of having had the opportunity of designing these things from the ground up because half the city was flattened in WWII,
The likes of Amsterdam and Copenhagen were rebuilt as car focussed cities - they made a decision in the 60's to move away from the car.
I was going to post similar, one site i was reading states "the first metro lines were only laid in 1977”
From that link it sounds like Dublin with the swampy ground.
By which you mean rat runs and congestion on those routes - cycling and overcrowded buses isn't for everyone,
Neither are cars. This is such a nonsense point trotted out every time as if bikes are being mandated as the only means of travel from now on. Far, far more is spent on infrastructure only available to private motorists and far, far more real estate is given over to them.
Amsterdam wasn't half-flattened in WW2.
Hamburg, on the other hand, took a pasting, and their cycle infrastructure is crap.
Warsaw also took a pasting, and they have very good cycle infrastructure.
I don't think that cycle infrastructure was at the top of the agenda when cities were being rebuilt after the war.
No, we should focus everything on facilitating, not benefiting, facilitating wider society… what about elderly, people with illness who can’t get on a bike ? That the comfort and safety of a car is the most responsible and safe for of transport…
I'm sure it's posted somewhere, but is there a link to the actual plan?
Is there something in the plan about banning cars that I didn't see?
No but plenty about ballsing up the road network to the extent that car, motorcycle, van and truck journeys take longer meaning more emissions…
was bad today at 2pm on a dry bright day,heaven help us on a wet dark rush hour,was in the middle of it and berated myself for nor doing rat run through Marino,that allied to the massive new development on Griffith ave will make other forms of transport more attractive.Agree with the intention until I get stuck in the outcome,probably the day of jumping in the car without planning to go anywhere is coming to an end.
Cars aren't for everyone. Car ownership is much higher among the rich and also among men. 33% of households in Dublin don't own a car.
Public transport is relied upon disproportionately by women, the less well off, older people and younger people. These groups have often been left behind in transport planning, because much of society thinks the 9-5 office worker is the most important. Public transport is far more inclusive than private cars, so if we want to facilitate wider society, then this is far more important.
great to hear another sustainable project is happening that will benefit the people and reduce traffic.
it will be a fantastic success.
we can no longer afford the amount of car use and space wasted because of it that exists in our cities.
it is gone past being any way affordable and we have to get those disproportionate costs, direct and indirect down.
that means cycle and public transport infrastructure, high congestion charges with a view to ultimately remove all cars from the cities to out of town multi-stories to then take PT in, large scale pedestrianisation, green spaces etc.
time to take back our cities and make them livible spaces, improving the health and sustainability of the them.
What about those that are too young or too old or too disabled or too poor to have a car. Cars are far from universally available. Not everyone can drive.
Those who want to continue to drive can drive. They’re not getting banned. Yet.
Great to see the new found concerns for emission levels from the car promoters.
If you really are concerned about emissions, you know what to do.
Yes, let’s hope that the days of unnecessary car journeys are coming to an end.
about this 'old people can't cycle' - how much traffic on say amiens street is made up of people too old and infirm to cycle, who are driving instead?
and maybe there are old people who would like to cycle. i know a couple of people in their 80s who still cycle; cycling is easier than walking when viewed purely in terms of efficiency of locomotion and impact on joints. it's not easier in terms of security of the bike, or sense of safety when using public infrastructure, but the latter point is one which is being hopefully addressed with this development.
There is no doubt that public transport is great, if it's available. Unfortunately the Northside of the city has been left behind in this regard, no Luas, metro shelved again etc.
This mess will just mean lots of vehicles stuck in jams spewing out fumes.
There is always a queue of cars to get into the gym ffs.
Just in case you missed it, both red and green Luas lines have substantial north side runs.
ah here, the luas red line never goes more than about 200m north of the liffey. this development is about providing means to get into the city centre from the northeast of dublin, which neither luas line facilitates.
Ah, yes, "unnecessary" car journeys. How dare you be so judgemental about my car journeys, or anyone else's.
Hence this project. It probably would not have gone ahead without it's large public transport component, as part of BusConnects. It's one of the busiest bus corridors in the country, so improving the bus infrastructure here is very important.
You can't bemoan the Northside being left behind on public transport and then give out about a massive public transport investment project for the Northside. Buses are an extremely important component of any transport system. More than twice as many people in London use the bus as the Underground for example.
your reaction would suggest that you think that no car journeys being made currently, are unnecessary?
and if your car journeys are all necessary, he clearly wasn't talking about you anyway.
No, I don't: but how are you to judge if my car journey is "necessary" or not? This is authoritarian, self righteous Bullsh*t.
I suppose I could play this childish game and ask if your bus or bike journeys are really "necessary". But I won't.