They ignored the person who placed the trades was a banker and former deputy head of the CIA. Because of his background, they said he had no terrorist ties, so the investigation was dropped. In a normal world, bets on airlines dropping weeks before 9/11 would be investigated, but after 9/11, investigations like this would look bad.
Once again NIST lied to the public and said if an explosive detonated a column, people blocks away would hear a loud noise. This video doesn't exist in the world of fantasy, and that loud bang never happened.
This video from CBS is for people who notice reality. It's loud enough to be an explosion. The reporter who's blocks away picks up the bang way off in the distance. That left side of the building started to collapse right after the bang.
Regarding nanothermite, it's only found in dust from the collapse of the twin towers. It seems like the brought down seven matches implosion more. Dropped and panacked floors, came down,
That's the thing, you won't hear them
wait until you hear about the silent explosives that really brought down the towers on 9/11
How come Russia, China, North Korea and Wikileaks know nothing about 9/11, Moon landing and flat earth conspiracies. You'd think they'd be delighted to let everyone know.
As for 9/11 being an "inside job" you really give that dunderhead Bush and his cronies far too much credit. They couldn't organise anything....let alone keep their mouths shut.
Tsk, you can prove anything with facts. I bet you couldn't do it with vague nonsense shouted by a fat American in a YouTube video.
This was investigated by the FBI and the SEC and was found to be innocuous
"
The UAL trading on September 6 is a good example. On that day alone, the UAL put
option volume was much higher than any surrounding day and exceeded the call option
volume by more than 20 times—highly suspicious numbers on their face.170 The SEC
quickly discovered, however, that a single U.S. investment adviser had purchased 95
percent of the UAL put option volume for the day. The investment adviser certainly did
not fit the profile of an al Qaeda operative: it was based in the United States, registered
with the SEC, and managed several hedge funds with $5.3 billion under management. In
interviews by the SEC, both the CEO of the adviser and the trader who executed the trade
explained that they—and not any client—made the decision to buy the put as part of a
trading strategy based on a bearish view of the airline industry. They held bearish views
for a number of reasons, including recently released on-time departure figures, which
suggested the airlines were carrying fewer passengers, and recently disclosed news by
AMR reflecting poor business fundamentals. In pursuit of this strategy, the adviser sold
short a number of airline shares between September 6 and September 10; its transactions
included the fortunate purchase of UAL puts. The adviser, however, also bought 115,000
shares of AMR on September 10, believing that their price already reflected the recently
released financial information and would not fall any further. Those shares dropped
significantly when the markets reopened after the attacks. Looking at the totality of the
adviser’s circumstances, as opposed to just the purchase of the puts, convinced the SEC
that it had absolutely nothing to do with the attacks or al Qaeda. Still, the SEC referred
the trade to the FBI, which also conducted its own investigation and reached the same
conclusion.
The AMR put trading on September 10 further reveals how trading that looks highly
suspicious at first blush can prove innocuous. The put volume of AMR on September 10
was unusually high and actually exceeded the call volume by a ratio of 6:1—again,
highly suspicious on its face. The SEC traced much of the surge in volume to a California
investment advice newsletter, distributed by email and fax on Sunday, September 9,
which advised its subscribers to purchase a particular type of AMR put options. The SEC
interviewed 28 individuals who purchased these types of AMR puts on September 10,
and found that 26 of them cited the newsletter as the reason for their transaction. Another
27 purchasers were listed as subscribers of the newsletter. The SEC interviewed the
author of the newsletter, a U.S. citizen, who explained his investment strategy analysis,
which had nothing to do with foreknowledge of 9/11. Other put option volume on
September 10 was traced to similarly innocuous trades.
Another good example concerns a suspicious UAL put trade on September 7, 2001. A
single trader bought more than one-third of the total puts purchased that day, establishing
a position that proved very profitable after 9/11. Moreover, it turns out that the same
trader had a short position in UAL calls—another strategy that would pay off if the price
of UAL dropped. Investigation, however, identified the purchaser as a well-established
New York hedge fund with $2 billion under management. Setting aside the unlikelihood
of al Qaeda having a relationship with a major New York hedge fund, these trades looked
facially suspicious. But further examination showed the fund also owned 29,000 shares of
UAL stock at the time—all part of a complex, computer-driven trading strategy. As a
result of these transactions, the fund actually lost $85,000 in value when the market
reopened. Had the hedge fund wanted to profit from the attacks, it would not have
retained the UAL shares.
These examples were typical. The SEC and the FBI investigated all of the put option
purchases in UAL and AMR, drawing on multiple and redundant sources of information
to ensure complete coverage. All profitable option trading was investigated and resolved.
There was no evidence of illicit trading and no unexplained or mysterious trading.
Moreover, there was no evidence that profits from any profitable options trading wen uncollected.171"
Pre knowledge of 9/11
In the days running up to 9/11 there was unusual trading activity on the two airlines with planes that were hijacked and crashed. An extraordinary amount of trading
"Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange recorded purchases of 4,744 "put" option contracts in UAL and 396 call options. On September 10, more trading in Chicago saw the purchase of 4,516 put options in American Airlines, the other airline involved in the hijackings, with a mere 748 call options in American purchased that day. No other airline companies had an unusual put to call ratio in the days leading up to the attacks"
Currently credible conspiracy theories coming from across the pond:
Trump tried to overthrow the election
Trump pressured the electors not to certify the results, so he could cling to power
Trump replaced the heads of the secret service and DHS (and possibly similar staff in the pentagon) after the election, before the attempted coup, so he could prepare for the coup
The texts which might prove / disprove any attempted coup have been erased, under orders from Trump's appointees, at his behest
All pretty credible, with multiple avenues of interest and an orgy of evidence (bar the missing texts, of course). No vague shadowy figures, no illuminati, no second shooter, no mysterious 'they'........ Just a bunch of bad faith actors with previous for this sorta thing.
And where are all our resident 'skeptics' when it comes to this matter? Why all the radio silence? Thought you guys questioned everything?
Michio Kaku who is typically wheeled out on US TV to refute the UFO conspiracy theory, flips .. interesting
That one has been top of CT’ist lists right up to 2920 when Covid knocked it down to 2nd place. There have been thousands of posts about it.
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/may/15/wind-of-change-did-the-cia-write-the-cold-wars-biggest-anthem
While on a musical theme, it turns out that those who suspected that the first live broadcast of a nightingale accompanying a musician, broadcast live on radio by the BBC in 1924 was a fake were correct:
The Cello and the nightingale (link)
Because they were better songwriters than The Scorpions? They've been behind all the best hits
Holland, Dulles, Holland
Lennon & Helms
Jagger & Bush
Lol why?
The C.I.A wrote The Scorpions song "Wind of Change"
I never thought I would find a video as bad as the Westboro Baptist Church spoof of Mandy called Sandy about the hurricane but there it is
@Cheerful S - I think I take your advice to spend time off this chat. More important things currently happening are important like Ukraine. JFK and 9/11 stuff are all done for now.
Always happy to help...
Lol. What a cringey video...
Some humor.
Yup. It's the only explanation that actually makes sense.
Your claim that they were rigged by 3 people using secret silent explosives does not make sense and is not plausible.
Yeah, secret magic silent explosives perfectly coordinated with terrorist attacks caused all those buildings to collapse..
Oh and welcome back to the forum, what happened to all the Covid conspiracies?
Yeah, planes caused them to collapse..
That was something @[Deleted User] claimed I believe. @Cheerful S claims it was a team of 16 guys using super secret nanothermite contained in a gel form and sprayed all over the building:
Also, both require that Larry Silverstein must have been one of these 3 or 16 people.
Presumably there was a whole network of people who had come up with the idea and hired them to do the demolition in the first place... And had coordinated the plan with the other team of Saudis who were going to be flying the planes so that the two attacks happened at the same time.
Strange that the team behind the explosive demolition never came forward to claim responsibility for their part of the attack, as seperate to the airborne attack. Seems like a lot of effort to do something that is highly likely to be discovered, but then to have no reason for having blown up building 7 and let others take the "credit" for your work.
Apparently its credible that 3 or 4 guys rigged the towers with enough explosives over one weekend.
Still my faveourite theory Ive seen on here.
Anyone else find it funny that the only conspiracy theorists still arguing are now claiming that all space flight is fake and that 9/11 was done by 16 guys over a weekend are examples of "credible" conspiracy theories?
Proves the point pretty good I think.
How could you have "seen this before" when this is the first time in history a building was secretly demolished using nanothermite?
@Fighting Tao - Isn’t there a whole sub forum asylum for this crap?
Fixed that for ye.
Yup, it's pretty dead, so Cheerful tries to resurrect it all this stuff once a year elsewhere.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/240e12baadbef0248a8a694618b3009d.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/43d5d8eb6f74f970975eb821385072d4.svg)
