I may yet decide to look for footage to corroborate my assertions.
I am, however, fully aware that you will never concede a hair's breadth of ground towards a conclusion that you are obviously very set against.
No, he was saying that my link wasn't from the day of 9/11 which I knew. I never said it was.
Lol. No you won't. Because no such footage exists.
If it does it would be exceedingly easy for you to post and show me up.
What's happening here is that you were simply wrong when you claimed to have seen him say that quote on live TV on 9/11. You were either mistaken, or out and out lying.
But now, you are just refusing to admit that you were wrong.
If you just cop to this mistake, then we can move on to whatever point you'd like.
You won't though, cause as with all your accusations, they seem to be coming with a whole lot of projection.
Cool. Provide the link that shows the footage from the day of 9/11 then.
So where's the proof that he said it live, on the day?
Do you have anything other than your word, which is, quite frankly, lower than the Russian Rouble at the moment?
Are you claiming that you and only you can remember this?
Why did you wait until now to elaborate on this, when you were asked about 15 times about it?
This is straight outta the 'plausible deniability' handbook from my earlier post......."I never said I had video proof of him saying it, I said I remembered him saying it live on TV". But that didn't happen. If it had happened the way you're claiming, there would be 10 million YT videos doing the rounds as the CTists furiously masturbated over it".
My bet's on him claiming that all that footage was erased by the government.
Never have to admit to being wrong when you can just invent new levels to the conspiracy.
And again, conspiracy theorist belief patterns are indistinguishable from trolling.
Gentlemen, it's completely irrelevant whether footage is readily available or not - a complete red herring
King Mob needs to stay on this point though as it's all he's got, bear in mind he had to concede that I didn't claim silent explosives were used
King Mob likes to wear people down but I'm enjoying this
I fear we'll never get to discuss the fiery inferno that engulfed the building*
* King Mob will call this angle an attempt to distract but I'm determined to introduce it anyway
If I wanted to distract I'd mention the premature reporting of the building having collapsed, while the building is still standing in the background
That last point makes you appear rather foolish for engaging with me in the first place ???
On mature recollection, it's possible that my memory was playing tricks on me but neither my existence or thoughts actually make any difference to what happened - I'm honestly not that important.
The authors of the comments all seem convinced that the building is still there, behind her, as she speaks.
https://youtu.be/0ZqP8moItcc
Food for thought (it's collapse is stunningly graceful)
https://youtu.be/PK_iBYSqEsc
I've been reading posts from the start of this thread
I recommend that any new contributers have a look too
🤡🤡
Translation: "I actually AM a wind-up merchant, but my memory is so **** that I thought he said it live, on the day, when he didn't. I'm too lazy to even get my fake conspiracy stuff correct.....whoops! But hey, it doesn't matter that I'm too spineless to admit I'm full of **** and guess what?........whike searching for the first video, which obviously doesn't exist, I discovered ANOTHER video where someone caught up in one of the most heinous crimes in history got mixed up and said the building had collapsed instead of saying its going to collapse. So I'll just gish gallop away from the Larry S video, like I never even brought it up, and move on to the "collapsed" one. And none shall be the wiser".
I'm hurt 😕
Some types need other types to validate their existence, binary stars as it were, orbiting each other in a spiral dance of intellectual exchange.
And yes, it would be a spiral as the system itself would be propelled by universal expansion, unless it's a conspiracy theory.
And dodged again.
Weird how things become a red herring when you don't want to discuss them.
Tell you what. Post the footage that shows him saying that quote on a live broadcast. Post any evidence that this actually happened.
Do that and I'll close my account.
Oh you can't treat me like the others 🐇 ( a little fluffy wabbit )
'Cos I'm not like the others 🤡🤡 ( 2 clowns )
You've honed your technique over time but I'm just a logic virgin, so to speak 🙂
Cool challenge dodged.
You can't link to the footage and now you're just posting rambling nonsense.
Again mate, why do you think you're making a case that conspiracy theorists are reasonable?
Do you think the Holocaust sounded reasonable when first described
My little doodlebug ?
Lol and there it is. Now you're pretending to be a holocaust denier to attempt to troll people.
Poor show.
You couldn't say "No" because of the corner you painted yourself into.
You would have believed anything the Nazis told you, and you know it.
This is from today's news, the story seems to go back more than 20 years
I wonder was it perceived as a conspiracy theory until that family finally apologised ?
Obviously a theory is no longer a theory once proven, that's why I typed "was"
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60610707
Not a hope did you see the tower that went on fire in the UK a few years later it didn’t fall.
Plenty people said that there was a lot of work going on in the months leading up to 9/11.
have you seen the amount of work required to rig a building for demolition? Nobody noted the miles of cabling that is required?
Plenty of towers have gone on fire and didn't fall. Was it hit by a much larger building collapsing beside it? Was the sprinkler system cut off? Did it burn all day unchecked? Was it the same design as WTC 7?
You need to start applying a little critical thinking to your own beliefs. Speaking of which, do you think 9/11 was an inside job? If yes, explain how it was done.
If you have to run away from that question or deflect, perhaps ask yourself why
Can you point to any examples of buildings of comparable size that were demolished with secret, possibly silent explosives?
Secretly by silent explosives? We’re you there on the fatal day?
Nope.
But that's the alternative proposed by most conspiracy theorists. The explosives must be silent because in all of the piles of footage of the buildings we hear no evidence for the loud sequence of explosions that always precedes a demolition.
Can you provide any examples of buildings being demolished by secret explosives. Can you provide any examples of demolitions using silent explosives?
If not, do you then believe that the demolition theory is impossible?
How do you believe the buildings fell if you believe that fire could not have caused it?
cameras were there.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/240e12baadbef0248a8a694618b3009d.svg)
