It's somewhat arrogant and presumptuous of you to think that you know how far everyone's comfort zone extends 🙂
Okay, and I'm sure you are aware you're on a conspiracy theory forum, you seem to be trying to hint that something else occurred with building 7 whilst at the same time claiming you agree with the investigations as to how it fell.
As mentioned before, conspiracy theorists play with hints, semantics, etc to hint at stuff whilst not committing to it because they know they are simply talking shite.
So what do you think brought it down?
Sorry, didn't mean to annoy you
You seem unable to appreciate that the opinion of the investigators and my little opinion may in fact converge
Think scientist getting paid to endorse a product, or indeed being disuaded from not doing so
All the best now 🙂
It's a mystery to me, that's why I find the event so fascinating. Some say this and some say that but I don't think we'll ever know the exact details.
What are the alternatives?
Not annoyed at all. So now you are claiming you have a different opinion from investigators, earlier you seemed to claim otherwise, but it's hard to tell. If you think something else occurred, that's fine.
Which begs the question, what happened to WTC 7 according to you?
Good question, people have come up with all sorts but it's impossible to rate them according to likelihood
You obviously don't know what "converge" means
What exactly are you taking from my scientist analogy I wonder?
Okay. No need for analogies or any of that, do you think something else occurred with WTC 7, if yes, what is it?
Aliens wearing tin foil hats vaporised the building with 5G ray guns 🙂
Any chance of writing that again, but in English this time?
What do you think happened with WTC7? Try not to change to talking about tobbaco, Iraq or aliens in your answer.
Yes. You claimed that he said this on the day on live TV.
He did not.
He said it a year later in a documentary.
The fact you can't actually get this right makes your entire stance very suspect.
Additionally, you are misrepresenting what he actually said and claiming that it means something it does not.
This is demonstrated by how you dodge and ignore my questions about the statement.
Isn't it funny. Conspiracy theorists keep trying to argue their theories are reasonable.
Yet here we are again with a conspiracy dancing around simple questions and refusing to actually explain their beliefs in direct definitive terms.
Just more vagueness and weasel statements to avoid actually making any kind of firm claims. (Cause he knows its all nonsense most likely.)
I should just repeat the question as we don't seem to be getting any closer to a proper answer, but to address the above. Conspiracies happen all the time, only have to open a newspaper or switch on the news, we know this.
So you think that WTC 7 was blown up by controlled demolition? Okay. That is tin foil hat stuff, anyway let's have a look at the comments you made and why they don't seem to make much sense.
First of all you start with appeal to motive, that the US wanted to go into Iraq, therefore they planned some part of 9/11. However you claim the only part of that was WTC 7 being rigged (the rest, presumably, happening as a real terrorist attack). Many people at the time didn't even know WTC 7 fell. Other buildings also collapsed or were torn down or partially collapsed on the day (like WTC 5 and 6). WTC 7 falling wasn't pivotal to any ultimate plan to go to war in Iraq.
Larry Silverstein. This just completely contradicts your first idea, which is it, an inside job by the US government or insurance fraud?
No burning aviation fuel: Office fires alone can weaken structural steel by over 50%. In WTC 7 they burnt all day, unchecked, 25% of it's WTC facing side was torn out, those fires burnt unevenly on multiple floors, the sprinkler system was knocked out so didn't work. The building fell down due to fire and the effects of fire.
NORAD exercises: Exercises happen all the time.
There are countless numbers of these truther talking points, they get brought up every time and recycled and reshaped to fit whatever narrative the person decides to fit to them. Which is why I ask the very simple question of what the inside job was, who did it and how.
So was this an inside job controlled demolition on a single building during a massive terrorist attack by the US government or insurance fraud by Larry Silverstein? (or do you want to try and "glue" both together somehow..)
Are you familiar with the expression "not mutually exclusive" ?
Are you back?
It seems to be the second sentence you don't understand this time 🙂
I never left. Are you going to address my points?
No
Read it again, you're incorrect
Of course not. Thanks for being honest at least.
Why are you afraid of addressing my points?
You are demonstrating quite nicely why conspiracy theorists and their theories aren't very reasonable.
Yes. So are genuinely suggesting that Larry Silverstein had his building deliberately destroyed to defraud the insurance, and the US government secretly took part in that controlled demolition of the same building in the midst of a large terrorist attack that the US government allowed to happen?
In the middle of broad daylight, in NY, with the world watching, and no one, not even the insurers (who conducted their own 5 year investigation into the building collapse) or FEMA, or hundreds of investigators involved in the NIST investigation spotted this?
Except for you.
Just to be clear, that's what you believe?
Yes
I read it, which parts are incorrect and specify how.
Sorry, I gotta go and tune in to cosmic vibes 🙂
The same person perhaps? very similar thought processes
I suspect they now wonder if I'm pulling their leg/s ?
Lol and now that you and your claims have been challenged on a very basic level you're resorting to the same lazy tactic of insults and false accusations that all conspiracy theorists fall back to.
Again you're demonstrating our point perfectly.
Where's the insult?
I agree that I was challenged on a basic level though 🙂
They're all the same
Sure what can you do?
I tried
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)