She'd be right to be more concerned about Donnie, he's a far greater threat to America than some random BLM activist. What's a "radical far leftie"?
Radical far leftie: someone who has cynically given up on the ideas of fairness and equality to pursue equity and intersectionality, typically following corporate slogans while every perceived sleight against them or their ideology is met with furious anger. 😅
Here's the latest statement from HRC for all her fangirls in here:
“Trump and Fox are desperately spinning up a fake scandal to distract from his real ones. So it’s a day that ends in Y. The more his misdeeds are exposed, the more they lie”.
She's right about them, as usual. It's no wonder they hate her.
Rudy Guiliani has also come out this week and said that he has proof of Hillary's spying in his house and has had it there for years.
Now who you want to pick as the Beacon of truth out of:
Donald trump Hillary Clinton and Rudy Guliani is up to you 🤣
Well given Rudy's track record, it's pretty clearly nonsense.
Was the evidence down his pants?
Is this a serious post? I will take this at face value and assume it is and treat it as such (Although I have my doubts):
Why do these people always have "proof for years" about things that would ABSOLUTELY DESTROY an opponent but not use it? DESTROY an opponent that they threaten to lock up. An opponent who's client (trump) threatened to have murdered? Let me ask again:
Why do these people always have "proof for years" about things that would ABSOLUTELY DESTROY an opponent but not use it? In this particular case:
This would 100% guarantee clinton is locked up (As they have been masturbating over for years). This would GUARANTEE that she would never run for any position at all. Would ruin her political and non-political career. They want her locked up. They chant it. They print clothing with the slogan. It was part of their 2020 campaign.
Last time: WHY not use this proof.
Rudy Guilani "Proof" quotes:
Stay tuned for big news tomorrow. @SidneyPowell1 and I have substantial evidence of fraud and I can confirm that we have Dominion in our hands and are analyzing the logs
"I found 900 people whose death certificates I had, they all died in 2000, before the election," Giuliani said. "I think the actual number our expert estimated was more in the range of about four or five or six thousand. But I had 900 death certificates. They're people who voted!"
I'll continue if you want.
Do you want us to look up trump "truth"/proof posts? I can or other can. A quick search is all it takes. But We would just add about 20 or 30 posts.
You ask if we should choose trump, clinton or guilani as a "beacon of truth"?
Well two of those three are raving lunatics so it's not a hard choice for any rational person.
Joy Ried is meant to be a journalist. A political assassination attempt would be a next 9/11 to somebody like her (and you) if a few key details of the story were changed
But thanks for proving my point that she's a biased left-wing political activist , and not a real journalist. The same goes for CNN who it would appear has instilled a life long fear of "Donnie Trump" into your consciousness. . Btw , BLM , CRT and MSM lies have and continue to be a far greater threat to America than Trump ever was.
Here's Why No One Trusts The CNN
CNN are definitely the issue, not fox the most popular ‘news’ outlet. Everyone is the enemy, CNN, MSM, BLM, CRT, HRC. It must get tiring having to keep tarring everything with the same brush. You need a lot of enemies to keep your own sides heads swivelling away from what you want them to not notice.
CNN and MSMBC were sued for half a billion dollars and lost. Remind me when Fox lost a multi million dollar law suit for false reporting? I'll wait.
There's a reason so many Americans watch Fox (including democrats). People don't like being liked to. The majority of Americans(on both sides) aren't as stupid as people like Joy Reid think they are. That is why her rating are in the gutter. .
"People don't like being liked to." 😂
Imagine believing everything Fox tells you while simultaneously thinking CNN are the problem.
Now I don't weigh in on this thread much, because I'm admittedly not very knowledgeable on American politics and I mostly just like having a bit of a laugh at the drama.....but aren't Fox News currently in the midst of a $1.6bn lawsuit for false reporting?
Didn't they pay a multi-million dollar settlement when their false reporting on the actual death of a young man, Seth Rich?
Didn't Tucker Carlson have a judge outright say people can't expect him to state actual facts as part of a judgement?!
I think the American media is pretty f*cked in general, but trying to put Fox News on a moral highground.....well that's just silly.
Not just a judge but Fox's own lawyers 😂😂
Indeed, it's known in legal circles as the "Rachel Maddow defence".
Except it's not though, is it? The only people you find using the phrase are right-wing bloggers/grifters, usually while trying to defend Carlson, whose employers actually had to admit in court that no one should take him seriously.
Why the sudden fascination with Joy Reid?
Joy Reid, 53, is a political analyst at MSNBC and host of its prime time cable news show, “The ReidOut.” She is author of, most recently, “The Man Who Sold America: Trump and the Unraveling of the American Story.”
Oh. That's probably why.
The same with Alex Jones.
you mean this? You didn't actually read what the judge said did you?
Carlson probably thinks of himself as being "above" Jones, but there's no difference really.
The judge makes a ruling on what the defence lawyer argues in court. In this case the Judge agreed with the defence.
Maddow’s statement is well within the bounds of what qualifies as protected speech under the First Amendment. No reasonable viewer could conclude that Maddow implied an assertion of objective fact. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
This comes after her lawyers argued that basically like Alex Jones her show is one of opinion and not journalism.
Lawyers for the MSNBC host said in that Oct. 21 motion that Bashant should throw out the suit by Herring Networks because Maddow was merely using hyperbole — and expressing her own opinion — when she said: OAN “really literally is paid Russian propaganda.”
So leaving aside Alex Jones, which "journalist" for a mainstream news company used the "I'm not a real journalist" defence first? Rachel or Tucker?
what part of that makes Maddow "not a real journalist"? do journalists not use hyperbole occasionally? is hyperbole what tucker does? his stuff sounds more like outright lies to me.
This argument reminds me of the time I was listening to a David Cross CD and he was lamenting the fact that he had to go to foreign news sites to get the truth about current affairs in the US because he had no faith in anything he saw on any of the news channels.
Rachel is an entertainer just like the other fella. Two opposite sides of the coin. You didn't answer me tho, which one went first? Rachel or Tucker?
I'm sure Guilani will be coming to Fox with his PROOF that he's had for years of Hilary Clinton spying. You know, the proof that he has had for years. Before the last election. The PROOF which would have crippled the Democrat party immediately before an election. The PROOF that he decided NOT to show at election time.
Honestly. And this is a genuine question. I will not reply with a rebuttal to this question: Do Trump supporters ACTUALLY deep down believe this? Really and honestly believe that Guilani has provable, verifiable, documented, researched PROOF and not just "eyewitness" reports like all the election fraud "proof" that fell apart?
I am curious.
Maddow is a journalist who occasionally employs hyperbole. Tucker is an entertainer. and a pretty poor one.
He probably lost it along with hunters laptop.
I note that you still haven't answered as to who went first, Rachel or Tucker.
first at what?
Ok. Both Tucker and Maddow shouldn’t be taken seriously. Grand.
The problem is that Tucker has the highest rated show on cable new and many people quote his opinions as fact. He lies regularly and aligns with white supremacists, they love him.
Maddow sometimes uses hyperbole.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/86b2bf519a78c14958c9040117dc4dc1.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
