Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
172737577783690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭MFPM




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick



    Completely agree with you both.

    The big problem here is what happens next. Putin is not a man who is prepared to lose face with the West, and I fear that unless he gets some kind of major concession(s) regarding his demands then an invasion of some sort is inevitable - as he wont want to additionally lose face with his own military. He always has to appear outwardly as the strong man.

    False flag is definitely a heavy odds on favourite in this race.



  • Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "Alex Jones territory" OUCH that had to hurt. :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly



    Plenty to show, you just don't acknowledge it, as hard a concept it is to grasp for you, you have given us all plenty of evidence of your garbage in this thread already.



    NATO already said there are fast track options available for Sweden and Finland, if they so please...

    This was from 2 or 3 weeks back when Russia had their amphibious assault brigade loitering off Gotland.

    Sweden already said they would prefer to stay neutral, but if any invasion threats came they would consider it.

    Finland said they were in discussions, but don't comment on their defence posture publicly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    When a regime is intent on going to war, that's generally how it works. It's what the Nazis did when they invaded Poland and what the US did when they invaded Vietnam and Iraq. And it's what Russia is doing here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,281 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    By that same logic, why does the US, the EU or NATO get to dictate where Russia bases its troops inside Russia? That is purely an internal matter for Russia, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,281 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Christ - that was really hard to watch. The US really has no evidence whatsoever - just a lot of assertions and claims which they expect the media to simply accept and regurgitate with zero fact checking. And why wouldn't they? The independent media has been happy to do so for so long.

    One part that made me laugh was where the spokesman pretended to be indignant that the reporter didn't simply trust the word of the US and UK government and intelligence services that claimed there were WMD in Iraq. How dare he insinuate the US/UK governments might lie to manufacture a justification for war!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭MFPM


    For someone with plenty to show, you're very shy about stepping up to the plate...bluster and bluff is all you've got...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,952 ✭✭✭zv2


    "How dare he insinuate the US/UK governments might lie to manufacture a justification for war!"

    That is the real ominous shadow behind all this; how dare we insinuate NATO would use this situation to do some global engineering.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,952 ✭✭✭zv2


    Oh right I get it now. You're one of those people who believe press = truth and the Russians are the enemy and Americans are good guys yada yada yada...

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't know what evidence they have, but they undermine their case massively with press conferences like that. If the first casualty of war is the truth, military people and politicians are the last place I would look for 'evidence' anyway.

    A retired US journalist, who admittedly might have been wrong, but it always stuck with me, told me that the AP is the Pentagon's friend, while Reuters is friendlier to the State Dept. That exchange yesterday could be viewed as the hawks putting pressure on the doves, pressing on the justification for action, not because they are appalled by it, but because they are irriatted by these delays and want to get on with their poxy, proxy war.

    All this chatter creates anxiety too, which drives weapons sales. Job done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    nope, not shy at all. Quite happy to point out when people duck and dive points and talk garbage about things that have been proven incorrect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    According to your personal opinion it won't happen.

    Likewise, according to my personal subjective opinion Russia aren't going to try it either. That doesn't mean it won't happen. Regardless of it happening or not, it's a smart move by the US to openly pre-empt such a scenario.

    Putin is escalating the situation in order to get concessions. If you were e.g. the leader of the UK, how would you respond to these types of aggressive moves from Moscow? (in a way that wouldn't lose you your job the next day)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Britain reports a 'heavy British military presence off the coast of ireland".

    https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/heavy-british-military-presence-off-irish-coast/

    Are they trying to provoke a confrontation with Russia?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,972 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I think it's pretty telling that nobody inside Russian believes an invasion of Ukraine is imminent. Prior to the invasion of Crimea there was wall to wall coverage on Russian state TV stoking up fears of the Maidan revolution and talking about the danger to the Russian speaking populations in Crimea and the east of the country. That is not the case now. Even critics of Putin such as Gary Kasparov and Alexei Navalany think the massing of troops on the border and the demands to NATO are just a bluff by Putin in order to get the international spotlight and try and win some concessions.


    This is an interesting DW interview with a Russian foreign policy expert, based in Moscow who also believes that there will be no invasion.



    I can't see how Putin could invade if it'd be a shock to most Russians. I've been weighing it up for the past few weeks but now I'd be very surprised if it happened. I'm not quite sure how Putin pulls back and saves face given the demands he made to NATO but I'm sure he'll figure something out and it's not as if he has to worry about a critical media at home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,281 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Heavy British military presence off the coast of Ireland? They must be planning to invade Ireland. There is no other explanation!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,276 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    My cleaner is from Ukraine and is just back after xmas. According to her people are very worried. With regard to Zelensky's statements she thinks he is "EedYOT".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Interesting that you used the word 'imminent'. Shillyshilly should have something to say about that.



  • Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The State Dept. spokesman had a lot more patience with that reporter than I would have had. Of course they're not going to reveal sources. I also agree that the preemption by publishing the operation was a great move by the US. Cost's nothing, and puts a ? mark against a possible strategy for the other side.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    3 aircraft wow Huge presence ....


    Nothing compared to the Russian presence on the Ukrainian border



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Well the Brits themselves called it a Heavy British military presence.

    So now you don't trust what they say?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    also conveniently failing to mention the Russian numbers in the Atlantic



  • Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭ Marie Strong Pocketful


    What's the lay of the land, people?

    Do we need the Irish fishermen to do Coveney's job again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Naval movements and transits are not unusual in the North Atlantic or indeed Irish EEZ. A live fire excericse of the sort Russia was planning most certainly was.

    The problem with posters like yourself is that you don't have the courage of your convictions. You speak the language of balance, and say "oh well the UK does x, and the US does y, so it's ok if Russia does z" - trying to draw ridiculous moral equivalencies and have a thin veneer of even-handedness.

    The real truth is that you're putting on a Lord Haw Haw act for a deeply illiberal and autocratic leader, and there's a deep seated psychological attraction to what you see as an all powerful Tsar like foil to the liberal democratic world you grew up under, with all its imperfections, however the best civilization has come up with, but for some reason reject.

    That's between you and your psychologist, but you should drop the conceit you care about Ukraine, peace on the European continent or anything else that makes our corner of the world worthwhile living in and defending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Was in the anti-war movement yonks back, marched against the Iraq war. I noticed there were more than a few who didn't give one toss about any Iraqi's killed by Saddam. It was partisan to them, they had to "pick a side", it wasn't possible to criticise all participants proportionally.

    There are a lot of nasty conflicts in the world, and there are these individuals who only selectively "care" about certain sides to certain conflicts because the perceived hypocrisy "annoys" them more than the sum total of suffering on all sides. As I've mentioned before it's the new Godwin in these threads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    According to George Allison self described journalist ..


    Not the British , but one man on Twitter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    What's with personalizing the attack?

    You conveniently omit that the post WW2 peace in Europe was maintained by a stand off between the 2 largest powers. Since then one of them imploded, but not entirely. The opportunity was there for US and NATO to act responsibly but instead they doubled down growing their power, undermined the UN and the 'rules based order' with military adventurisms here and there, and now have their finger prints all over the messy situation in Georgia and Ukraine.

    The implosion of the USSR and subsequent US hegemony has created an unstable world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    This stuff is bizarre.

    So you think that the US invaded Iraq to SAVE Iraqi lives? (seriously?)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement