Anyone know what is his medical exception?
your point about the players is nonsense. They’ll be licking their lips at him not being in the draw. I have competed internationally in my sport and can tell you that if the best guy didn’t turn up, and I won, it would not diminish it in any way whatsoever.
fans will get over it. I think nadal and federer are bigger draws than Djokovic. And it might be a loss to his own sponsors, but I think probably even more people will watch this year due to this, irrespective of whether he is in it
Facts don’t lie. Djokovic does.
Bye bye.
He didn't apply in good faith though? His actions were the complete opposite.
He tried to pull the wool over their eyes and was caught out. That alone should be grounds for refusal.
The only person to blame for all of this mess is himself.
Fair play to you being so disabled that you can't play any sport whatsoever but you can lift bales of hay and buckets of feed for animals with your arms.
TOMORROW (SATURDAY) LUNCH TIME (1PM) TOP OF GRAFTON STREET.
I WILL BE GIVING €50 NOTES TO EVERYONE WHO WILL COME WITH boards.ie WRITEN ON PAPER SHEET.
GUARANTEED LIKE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNEMNT! TRUST ME AND COME!
None of this has anything to do with the conversation.
You're being duplicitous.
He applied in good faith and followed the guidelines.
We're talking about the exemptions process here and having proof for it.
Judge Anthony Kelly even commented directly on that.
"What more could this man have done?"
The Australian judge, who was hearing a legal challenge by Djokovic regarding his visa cancellation, raised concerns about the player's treatment after he was detained on arrival.
Judge Anthony Kelly said that "what more" Djokovic could have done, stating that the tennis player had received the required medical exemption from COVID-19 vaccination before he travelled to Melbourne to participate in the Australian Open 2022.
The judge also said that Djokovic presented evidence of that when he landed on Wednesday.
When Djokovic's lawyers challenged the Australian government's decision to revoke his visa, the judge said, "The point that I am somewhat agitated about is what more could this man have done?"
Lol.
Nice one!
Tries to make bad points and now when they are exposed, it's all not relevant.
What more could he have done?
Not lied on his application would have been a good start.
Yeah, another appeal set for Sunday. Might be too late though. I get the impression that the decision to overturn the original cancellation was a facesaving exercise and that they had intended to cancel again anyway.
Didn't take much to figure out your post was a complete lie in fairness.
A bit like Novak's answers on the visa forms
Again, this is about the exemptions process.
If you'd like to be relevant to the conversation you could take the time to see what it's about.
Lying on your from / inputting incorrect information is not "in good faith" no matter what way you spin it.
Tries to lie and now when they are exposed, it's all not relevant to the conversation
The judge who handled first appeal seems to have ordered Novaks detention at 8am aussie time and has moved the case to the federal courts. If I were Novak, I'd be packing bags .
Djokovic to be taken into custody at 8am Melbourne time Saturday for deportation from Australia.
Australians have made many sacrifices during this pandemic and they have the right to expect the result of those sacrifices to be protected
Scott Morrison - Prime Minister.
Looks like the end of the road for the boy in this instance. Imagine how much more simple life could have been if he didn't choose two little injections as the hill that his right wing views would have him die on.
I guess money can't buy brains.
You know very well that the conversation that you were engaged in was about - the exemptions process and the fact that Djokovic would never have come near the border without that and being accepted.
if you are making a poor show of effectively arguing your side this is a poor effort.
looks like sour grapes really for your failed arguments.
The 14-day thing has nothing to do with the exemptions process.
the other discussion about Asian markets was where the other guy said it wasn't relevant at the end.
You're the one that started this little tangent. I'm just agreeing with you that it has nothing to do with the thread.
they made a decision based on the information provided to them. the information provided to them was incorrect. their decision is void.
This whole mess reflects very bad on Novax, if he did have covid when he said he did and was out and about without a care in the world in the days that followed then he is a disgrace. I do hope he misses the Aus Open.
Yeh yeh yeh..
but come on, to allow him this far and then boot him out due to this?
FFS, is there any common sense/discretion/humanity to be asked for?
that minister did not have to do this. It was not at all a necessity that he did it. He did it based off nothing but a contempt and a hostility towards the situation.
No information provided to them was incorrect for the exemptions process.
The judge said the same.
"What more could this man have done"
The 14 day travel thing has absolutely nothing to do with the exemptions process.
the judge was not deciding on the merits of the visa, only on the procedure followed by ABF.
Edit deleted not getting involved.
has someone been bullshitting?
I'm starting to wonder if Glasso is Novak's dad. Cannot see the wood for the trees.
the judge was not commenting on the merits of his visa application.
The laws says Novak is innocent : "All us lefty liberals and vaxxers need to shut up and accept he is innocent".
The law says they were wrong and in light of new evidence Novak needs to go : "fk the law"
The Judge commented precisely that Djokovic had followed everything he was supposed to do under the process he applied to.
It's very clear what the judge said and meant.
The JUDGEMENT was made on the ABF procedure.
It's very easy to understand really.