Anyone know what is his medical exception?
It's the reason he's being denied entry.
Very relevant.
It wasn't a lie. It was an "error". Feels like I'm hearing from Boris Johnson's spokesperson.😂
For the last time if you can't get the actual point being discussed with other posters why keep spamming something not being discussed.
Nobody is denying the 14 day travel error but that had no relevance to the area in question - the exemptions process.
just leave it there.
AGAIN.
you can keep ignoring that he lied on his visa application or say it doesn't matter but at the end of the day he is facing the consequences of his own dishonesty.
no idea. it doesn't make djokovics visa application any more honest.
he lied on his visa application.
I would accept your first point, but still disagree with it. The other 2 points still stand imo. The fans will want to see him (real tennis fans). The sponsors will want him involved, especially the tv networks. Can you imagine the viewing count for his games as opposed to him not being there?
Djokovic only came to Australia in the first place because he applied to and followed the medical exemption process and was granted it.
That's the key point that was being discussed at the point you jumped in.
Judge agreed that "what more could this man have dene" in this regard.
nothing further to discuss as conflating other things to the original discussion that is not to deal with the actual point being discussed is a mess.
From what I can make out, the government withdrew their argument in front of Kelly, as it was obvious the initial rejection of the visa by ABF was done incorrectly. You would wonder what they were thinking, another 40 minutes and it was done and dusted. Why did they jump the gun?
the judge made no judgement on the validity of his visa. none. djokovic lied on his visa application. he is facing the consequence of that decision. He is not special, he is not above the rules.
Not lied on his immigration documents that he had been in Spain for 14 days.
The Judge commented precisely that Djokovic had followed everything he was supposed to do under the process he applied to.
It's very clear what the judge said and meant.
The JUDGEMENT was made on the ABF procedure.
It's very easy to understand really.
Judge Anthony Kelly said that "what more" Djokovic could have done, stating that the tennis player had received the required medical exemption from COVID-19 vaccination before he travelled to Melbourne to participate in the Australian Open 2022.
The judge also said that Djokovic presented evidence of that when he landed on Wednesday.
When Djokovic's lawyers challenged the Australian government's decision to revoke his visa, the judge said, "The point that I am somewhat agitated about is what more could this man have done?"
The laws says Novak is innocent : "All us lefty liberals and vaxxers need to shut up and accept he is innocent".
The law says they were wrong and in light of new evidence Novak needs to go : "fk the law"
the judge was not commenting on the merits of his visa application.
I'm starting to wonder if Glasso is Novak's dad. Cannot see the wood for the trees.
has someone been bullshitting?
Edit deleted not getting involved.
the judge was not deciding on the merits of the visa, only on the procedure followed by ABF.
No information provided to them was incorrect for the exemptions process.
The judge said the same.
"What more could this man have done"
The 14 day travel thing has absolutely nothing to do with the exemptions process.
Yeh yeh yeh..
but come on, to allow him this far and then boot him out due to this?
FFS, is there any common sense/discretion/humanity to be asked for?
that minister did not have to do this. It was not at all a necessity that he did it. He did it based off nothing but a contempt and a hostility towards the situation.
This whole mess reflects very bad on Novax, if he did have covid when he said he did and was out and about without a care in the world in the days that followed then he is a disgrace. I do hope he misses the Aus Open.
they made a decision based on the information provided to them. the information provided to them was incorrect. their decision is void.
You're the one that started this little tangent. I'm just agreeing with you that it has nothing to do with the thread.
You know very well that the conversation that you were engaged in was about - the exemptions process and the fact that Djokovic would never have come near the border without that and being accepted.
if you are making a poor show of effectively arguing your side this is a poor effort.
looks like sour grapes really for your failed arguments.
The 14-day thing has nothing to do with the exemptions process.
the other discussion about Asian markets was where the other guy said it wasn't relevant at the end.
Djokovic to be taken into custody at 8am Melbourne time Saturday for deportation from Australia.
Australians have made many sacrifices during this pandemic and they have the right to expect the result of those sacrifices to be protected
Scott Morrison - Prime Minister.
Looks like the end of the road for the boy in this instance. Imagine how much more simple life could have been if he didn't choose two little injections as the hill that his right wing views would have him die on.
I guess money can't buy brains.
The judge who handled first appeal seems to have ordered Novaks detention at 8am aussie time and has moved the case to the federal courts. If I were Novak, I'd be packing bags .
Lol.
Nice one!
Tries to lie and now when they are exposed, it's all not relevant to the conversation
Lying on your from / inputting incorrect information is not "in good faith" no matter what way you spin it.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/24615175400ae675a1f589d8e5bd3285.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w7.vanillicon.com/v2/75771797d68b15f0c5c6e631c7bb7ced.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/240e12baadbef0248a8a694618b3009d.svg)