Anyone know what is his medical exception?
This exact claim was also investigated by Ken Early on Second Captains before Christmas. A former English football player was highlighting exactly what you say there. That there was a suspiciously high incidence of cardiac type events of football players in 2021. Good thing then that FIFA have been keeping quite rigorous track of these types of cases since 2014. Before the pandemic, before the vaccines. Before such data could be influenced by political shennanigans and pharma companies.
It turns out that the year with the highest amount cardiac events was... 2018. There is no statistical increase since the vaccines. No cover up. Nothing. Except annecdotes from dubious sources.
However, because people are more sensitive to these things now (particularly by people who are actively searching for anything to back up wild claims) these cases are brought to our attention much more than they were and therefore there's a perception of something going on. But there's not.
Usually when there's no evidence that something specific caused a particular phenomenon, you move on and try to find something that there is evidence for. Debunking isn't a matter of solving a mystery, it's excluding a claim.
He could have gone for the 14-day quarantine option, which in his case wouldn’t mean sitting in a hotel room. He can afford to do what Hollywood stars have done: rent a luxury house in the countryside for the duration. It would have been a holiday, no hardship at all on his budget.
No, Australia should not take the word of his doctors. They have a proceedure of putting the evidence behind applications for exemption before a panel of medical experts for review. I'll bet that's what they did - if there was any such evidence, which we all know there wasn't.
i think they were being sarcastic based on the Dr Nick gif but it is hard to tell these days.
Not sure about that. Maybe that was the case in the past, but the latest rules for non-vaccinated travellers in the state of Victoria seem to state that you have to quarantine in a designated quarantine hotel. The "home quarantine" option seems to be only available for those between 12 and two months but under 18 and travelling alone or with a vaccinated companion, or adults with a medical exemption:
https://www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/information-overseas-travellers
Djolovic is a clown and has used his position to get away with a lot of things. Finally somebody has decided to treat him like everybody else and he's kicking up a big stink over it.
He shouldn't be allowed in the Australian Open anyways. All fans have to show their double vaccination passports to be allowed on. It'd be very hypocritical to allow an unvaccinated player compete.
Might be sane or insane. Doesn’t mean they’re not entitled to their beliefs.
of course they are entitled to their beliefs. other people are entitled to their beliefs that people who think that are idiots.
You are only insulted if you choose to be insulted. No one is asking you to agree with him or facilitate him. You are just being asked to allow him to have his beliefs.
It is because he has some medical condition, and in all likelihood would require medication that are banned for sports people.
what does that have to do with him not being vaccinated?
As long as you will concede then that anti vaxxers in turn are allowed to consider you an idiot then all is well. As a species we used to be allowed to have a conversation that ended in “well you consider my beliefs to be ridiculous and I certainly consider your beliefs to be ridiculous so we will just leave it at that and I wish you well. Good day”.
That’s not good enough now. 1 side wants the other to be silenced and removed from the game. It’s ludicrous.
If you check each player they aren't showing false facts and there's other articles available.
not all beliefs are equal. there is enough dumb already in the world without giving credence to uneducated and ignorant beliefs.
Dr Malone also , if you listened to the interview you'll know Mcculough asked Malone to bring up his interview was filmed before the omicron that with that you can catch it again but the other variants you can't catch it twice. And the misinformation fact checkers people funded by pfizer . It's obvious that Djokovic is being used as an example from all the backlash allowing him the exemption.
See here you are incapable of just accepting that others think differently to you. You want the other opinion to be squashed. Hopeless.
i know they think differently. their thinking is based on ignorance and most likely a lack of education.
Being entitled to a belief doesn't really mean anything. It's such a low bar to set - to state that someone is allowed to carry a thought in their head - that it's almost entirely meaningless. Disagreeing with someone's belief, criticising their belief, stating that expression or propagation of that belief may have dangerous implications - all of those can be very valid actions that in no way inhibit the entitlement to have a belief.
There is, however a real danger in the mistaken belief that all opinions are equal. They are not. There are factual statements and false statements, and they are not of equivalent worth. There are beliefs based on evidence and proof, and there are beliefs not based on such, and they are not of equivalent worth. There are beliefs that if acted upon can cause harm to others, and there are others that will not, and they are not of equivalent worth.
If we were to just decide that anything that anyone thinks is of equal worth, it would make all beliefs equally worthless. Believing that the earth is an ellipsoid is worth more than believing that it is flat. Anyone is entitled to believe that it's flat, but it would be disastrous for them to be involved in say the mathematics of launching a satellite, because their calculations would be totally wrong. Now, maybe it would seem that outside of some specialist professions, it doesn't really matter if you believe the earth is flat or not - but it does. We all stand upon a body of knowledge, and the method by which we gain that knowledge - by the gathering and analysis of fact, and by differentiating between fact and fallacy - is integral to all our success. If we undermine the very nature of knowledge by deciding that all beliefs are of equal value, we risk losing the lot.
Don't confuse the entitlement to belief with the value of the beliefs themselves. And no one should ever be afraid to call out beliefs that don't stand up to scrutiny. Our entire progress as a species is based upon it.
Because people haven't been taking heart attacks on Gaa pitches for years
Over 140 footballers have died according to FIFAs sudden death register pre covid
Depends on the medical condition.
Boo hoo.
You keep saying that but nobody is denying it. I only just said earlier on this thread that I agree they have that right.
They are still idiots though
I think it's great that the anti vaxxers speak up and have their say.
Now we know who the loopers are
Well done you have found an even worse source....absolute nonsense... qanon level nonsense
Correct, yes, saying they don't have evidence and didn't provide any evidence in their article is exactly how debunking works. I mean, what do you want them to do......"here's articles to 150 players who DIDN'T die from vaccine complications"?
Also, it is pretty noteworthy that you are dismissing the factcheck article because, in your opinion, they don't really back up their claims that the article is bullsh1t. And yet, in the same breath, you DO NOT expose the original article claiming all these athletes have died because they were vaccinated to the same standards.
In your eyes, it is okay to say "X number of people died because of Vaccines" without any evidence.
But you are sceptical of those who say "No they didn't" because they don't provide ample evidence?
Really? Do you not see the disconnect here? It is telling that you (and we can expand this to most CTers, truth be told) expect more rigourous proof from those debunking the claim than from those making the claim in the first instance.
If there were droves of professionals dying on their feet because of the vaccines, then there'd be a giant list of them that every anti-vaxer would be furiously masturbating over every time it was updated as they scream "SEEEEEE! WE TOLLLLLLD YOU! The Vaccines were the devil". Instead we just have a list of people who died. I've clicked into a random sampling of these and not one of them mention complications arising from the vaccines. Not one. I'd be interested if you could provide one that I can use.
And the'ts before we get into the bollocksology involved in some of them........A golf caddy who had a heart attack on the 9th green, an 86 year old ex boxer, a 13-year old who died before the vaccine was even available to that age group. The first quarter of that list is chock full of people who weren't even eligible for the vaccine at the time of their deaths, FFS.
Who is stopping him from having his beliefs?
I believe TooTired123 is an Alien from Jupiter's moon Europa.
Fight me.
Look up Dr. Ferrari, Dr. Fuentes and Dr. Freeman then come back and tell me how you should never ever question a sports doctor
How do you know that all these athletes took the vaccine?