OK post when you find it .I have Sheridan's book Death in December and Ralph Riegel's book A Dream of Death
I'll have to check where I read it. Pretty sure it's from one of the books. The context was Ursula was saying her son told her that Bailey had told police something about him. And she said Bailey later visited their house and denied he said this, then went on a rant about how he was sure Daniel du plantier killed sophie.
The Jacksons also at a later stage informed the gardai that Ian was trying to involve them in a scheme to give some incriminating evidence to the gards and get some payment for it (so Ian could show the gards were corrupt and paying people to manufacture evidence) Needless to say the Jacksons were not interested in Ian's shite and immediately told the gards about it. (I think this was mentioned in the West COrk podcast)
Do we have any indication of when Senan Molony came down?
Senan says "I think i got a phone call on St Stephen's Day" about 1.40 mins in. I didn't listen to it all so am not sure if Senan says when he went down
I read somewhere that Ursula Jackson made a statement indicating Ian told police her son was in the area of the murder on the night. She was upset about this
where did you read it though? Was it reliable?
Do we have any indication of when Senan Molony came down? Getting the fill on 24th is a lot different from getting the fill on say, the 28th.
Yes Arianna is the student who stayed with Ginny for Christmas and saw the bucket in the bath/shower.
I saw that article about Ursula Jackson finding the axe head. She's right next door to the studio house... the implication being that the killer burned the axe and tossed it into her burn pile.
I read somewhere that Ursula Jackson made a statement indicating Ian told police her son was in the area of the murder on the night. She was upset about this. If I am speculating and put two and two together.... I come up with this:
What if Ian burned the axe, then tossed the axe head in the neighbor's burn pile, then tried to throw suspicion on the neighbor's teenage son?
what reason do you think
arrest today? Also he says the house showed slight disturbance which was shown to be wrong.
That you Ian you rogue.
This Is From The Front Page of The Sunday Tribune on this day in 1996.
moloney was sent down from dublin by his paper, the Star? Ian briefed him and gave him the "fill" . Moloney said it was an excellent "fill" pages of it so Bailey was a good journalist.
then Bailey told Moloney "your on your own now". Moloney wanted bailey to hold his hand going down to the murder scene to meet gaards. He whines how embarrassed he was going alone... some journalist
When did Arianna Boarina get to Schull?
that the woman who saw the coat being soaked?
Have you seen this floppy The late Ursula Jackson also told gardai how she found an axe head she did not recognise in the ashes of a bonfire at the back of her home six weeks after the killing.
The late Ursula Jackson also told gardai how she found an axe head she did not recognise in the ashes of a bonfire at the back of her home six weeks after the killing.
https://www.thesun.ie/news/4142158/ian-bailey-neighbour-claim-sophie-toscan-du-plantier-husband-trial/
Why would anyone repeatedly change their name and delete posts on boards? Only one reason I can think of LOL
If anyone here feels like sharing their expertise on the case, I would appreciate the help with these questions:
scoobs is pleasant until you question st ian then gets snotty. i can say bailey is a thug because of the way he hit jules but i can also see he may not have killed sophie. Scoobs cannot divorce one from the other. Hope that is non sequitury enough
Thanks for sharing
You kept all the pms? Well that's bloody strange for a start.
why did you delete them when i said i had saved them?
what exactly do you hope to achieve by keeping all my pms, I'd love to know? All I know is I saw through your nasty facade so rest assured I didn't share anything of interest with you
You did share things of interest but maybe you lied. Do you object to me posting the pms?
your pms were pleasant till i posted online i think IB is a violent thug whether he killed sophioe or not, then you sent a snotty pm so I do not owe you any privacy. You are great to give it tell people what to post but anyone who sees through you is said to be stalking you.you love then to play victim. Last night you told a new person he should not post certain things. If you do not want to be challenged why come here
Thanks to you, this thread has descended into nasty personal attacks and is rarely about finding the truth and justice for Sophie.
justice, as you see it, for IB is what you want, not for sophie. i think i am embarrassing you.why would you care about my embarrassment?
I will say it again, leave me alone. You are only embarrassing yourself
if you post on a public forum i can reply so long as i keep to the rules. I believe i do since i am not saying anything personal to you but challenging what you say. You are an advocate for Bailey and should declare that to other posters.
And by the way, I'm not abusive to anyone. I'll say my piece and move on. Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of the word because you're an abuser yourself who manipulates people and pretends to be their friends by pm to get information
what information? you said you did not tell me anything, so who did i get information from by pretending friendship?
What a very sad existence you lead.
even if that were true it would not be relevant. sad people can make observations too
I must publicly declare my connections and if I know Bailey??? Have you heard yourself? It would be hilarious if it wasn't so weird. Nobody, absolutely nobody on this public forum is under any obligation to share anything whatsoever, least of all with you.
Then why don't you deny it?
Great to know we'll be seeing much less of you
I mean, I know the answer to this but how could I possibly share without being accused of something??
So I guess you'll have to wait 😅🤷♀️
non sequitur on cue! your specialty
maybe a small dick..
So. The distractions have been about as much fun as toothache. Does anybody expect to see Murder at the Cottage; Series 2. (How it was finally solved)?
Excuse me ?
I don't really care tbh.
Just don't expect DM responses on twitter from my associates with your endless and pointless questions.
Cheers.
I don't engage with anybody on pm and so ignored you, scobie or whoever. It didn't take me long before that to see who you were, so I've scrolled past most of your posts since.
Ahh mamboozle you've sided with the trolls, you must be so proud.
👏👏👏👏
ET tu mamboozle
WTF?? Have you actually read the last few pages?
At least I don't jump from here to twitter asking the same questions and ignoring all the thought out responses, people have put alot of effort into answering you yknow? I'm in a group chat on twitter where a certain poster you approached wanted to make sure what he told you was accurate. People spent time on that. Do you even care?
Why would I want to lock the thread? I'm one of the few that has added something, only to receive endless abuse in return.
Seriously
This looks like an attempt to lock the thread. Couldn't you just ignore whoever offends you and shut the f#78 up?
This is my last reply to you, so don't think I'll rise to your nasty vitriol again, OK?
Your behaviour towards me for months has been downright weird and stalkerish. YOU pmd me when I was Scooby, you have a private profile remember? You kept all the pms? Well that's bloody strange for a start. Why exactly would you say that on a thread? Does it give you a feeling of power? Maybe you have a small dick 🤔😅 what exactly do you hope to achieve by keeping all my pms, I'd love to know? All I know is I saw through your nasty facade so rest assured I didn't share anything of interest with you. You must think I'm stupid.
I'm sorry, I must publicly declare my connections and if I know Bailey??? Have you heard yourself? It would be hilarious if it wasn't so weird. Nobody, absolutely nobody on this public forum is under any obligation to share anything whatsoever, least of all with you.
I'm amazed that people have liked your nasty drivel posts, but I guess it takes all sorts.
I will say it again, leave me alone. You are only embarrassing yourself. Unfortunately I can't ignore you because you have a private profile and that function is unavailable.
And by the way, I'm not abusive to anyone. I'll say my piece and move on. Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of the word because you're an abuser yourself who manipulates people and pretends to be their friends by pm to get information. What a very sad existence you lead.
More waffle.... To reiterate "it is simply an acknowledgement of how it would be approached in a legal environment"... That's complete waffle. A legal environment wouldn't be looking at a citizens behaviour in the various "limelight"
It's that thing when some barrister says ; Mrs Summitatem, you expect your parvenu hysterical vulgarity to be taken seriously when the decline in the intelligence of your contributions is becoming apparent although you have barely begun and from such a low base? Is this a starting or end point? The latter.
There would be no legal reason to look at such things. It's not an acknowledgement of anything. Mere waffle.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b1891d95e9e926c005ad3f5c153aacc5.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w3.vanillicon.com/v2/37b29390e71419ead582d06229ae30a3.svg)
