I for one do not believe he shot them people out of self defence and never meant to kill them. I think he intended to kill them and thought he would get away with it. The Judge as well is a joke. What a very strange trial. Only in America.
A little slow ,
I think some people that have been watching too many movies they all end with two protagonists who drop all their weapons to beat each other to death, and come out of it with only black eye and cut lip.
You get isolated or down in riot or mob, there a high risk of being beaten to death.
Halle.....fcukin........luja. Finally. You admit that Rosenbaum attacked Rittenhouse.
Ryan Balch testified in court that Joseph Rosenbaum said, "I catch any of you guys alone tonight, I'm going to **** kill you." Balch testified that Rittenhouse was right beside him when Rosenbaum said that so I'm going to say your above statement about no evidence that a threat was made is false.
Rosenbaum was also seen with a chain earlier in the evening. (On camera) Rittenhouse wasn't to know he no longer had it.
This photo is from 16 minutes before Rosenbaum was shot.
"Rittenhouse wouldn't have known anything about the three he shot"
Correct.
However, if their past indiscretions are anything to go by, then they could be a good indicator of how they likely behaved on the night in question.
A verifiable track record of scumbag behavior, or mentally deranged behavior, could be a good window into how they acted during this particular incident. But we'll never know for sure, because none of us were there.
Where as, some the stuff you are lumping onto Rittenhouse is supposition, at best. And some is just outright lies, based on your heavily biased opinion of him.
You really do have blinkers on, don't you.
There's clear evidence that he earlier said he was going to kill Rittenhouse. Someone other than Rittenhouse testified to this in court (apologies, I can't remember his name).
Then a short while later he chased Rittenhouse, threw something at him, kept chasing him, and finally when he was close enough he lunged for the rifle.........all corroborated by video footage and witness testimony.
Is anything I have said above incorrect, apart from my blinkers comment maybe?
Under Wisconsin law, an action which causes another to fear bodily injury can be considered assault. Chasing someone can be considered assault. Throwing something at someone can be considered assault. Trying to grab someone's rifle can be considered assault.
It's very difficult to see how Rittenhouse can be considered the aggressor in any of the shootings. Prior to each encounter he tried to de-escalate the incidents by withdrawing from the situation.
Why was Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse? To give him a cuddle? To tell him what a good job he was doing? He either wanted to attack Rittenhouse or he wanted to be shot (there is video footage etc. of that). Either way, he got his wish. He did attack Rittenhouse and he did get shot.
It is absolutely the victims fault, if victim is the right word. Maybe the deceased or the injured might be more accurate. All three of them attacked Rittenhouse. Notice how Rittenhouse didn't shoot anybody else, only those who were attacking him.
Lol ...
You seem oblivious that you are holding others to standards that you don't reach. You demand proof before anything is believed.
Imagine that .
I never claimed he had no history of any criminal convictions...
Not that anyones convictions the night the were shot dead unarmed comes into it,
Rittenhouse wouldn't have known anything about the three he shot
That's my exact point.
Going by what actual facts, given in a court of law, and ignoring opinion pieces you read from any news outlet, the verdict couldn't possibly be anything except not guilty.
The fact that the people Rittenhouse shot happened to be **** is just a Brucie bonus.
You seem oblivious that you are holding others to standards that you don't reach. You demand proof before anything is believed, until it's a belief you agree with, and then a baseless accusation is fair game to be spouted.
You reached "peak Gatling" when you claimed that apart from the rape and sexual assaults, rosenbaum had no history of criminal offences.
Don't go any further.
Yeah Rittenhouse's life is ruined for having thousands of devoted fans.
Correlation does not equal causation though.
Honestly though, I've a pain in my face with everything being boiled down to left v right on this site this past few years. As if that's how the real world works. Most of us are somewhere around the middle and see some benefits in liberal and conservative views.
Christ it's exhausting listening to people talking shïtê about this case when there are a lot of fair YouTubers covering it live.
Just a reminder, not everything needs to be turned into a right wing/left wing propaganda drive.
It's actually possible, if you open your mind a bit, to see things from a less polarized position.
They have wrongful death legislation no mention of links to aquttials at trial ,open to correction thought
I’m not sure that’s true. A number of States now have legislation saying that in the event of an acquittal in a criminal trial, it provides immunity from civil suit from the same killing. I’m trying to determine if WI is one of those States. (My own State doesn’t even require the trial, just the State concluding self defense and thus not pressing a charge)
Just a reminder that the correlation between being registered in the last couple of years and holding a right-wing opinion on virtually everything discussed on CA is very high. Trolls will troll and the bait is being bit.
Its the SJW thing, anyone who commits heresy must have their lives ruined, to the point of suicide
It's the way cults always try to impose their orthodoxy on a society, use their bottom feeding zealots to terrorise others in silence.
What ,
Armed Rednecks in pickup trucks chasing and killing an unarmed Blackman is called ,
A lynching
spreading lies for your own agenda your the one driving this here
you dont even seem ashamed when caught out and called !!
weird man really weird
not lynching gatling you told another lie naughty naughty
@[Deleted User] Has that been proven he was identified by multiple people who were there and also know him,
So if it doesn't matter what he did or didn't so before the shooting ,why would it matter if anyone who he killed had convictions or not before the shooting ,
It can't be a one way conversation oh no no he can't be questioned, but everyone else can
Has that been proven?
If it hasn't, why are you willing to believe that he beat a girl but disbelieve that a convicted child rapist, who later attacked him, may have threatened to kill him earlier in the day?
A white, violent child rapist who repeatedly shouted "ni*gger" was out defending the rights of disenfranchised? Lol. Ok man.
Why is it you dismiss a convicted child rapist's acts as nothing to talk about, going so far as to say that "apart from the rape and molestation, his record is clean" yet think bringing up an unproven and unsubstantiated accusation about Rittenhouse is fair.
The language you are using is misogynistic too.
You seem to be coming apart at the seams Gatling.
Blaming call of duty too?
What do you call chasing down an unarmed man with two truck's of armed rednecks .
Family ?
Hands up now honest question .
How many on this thread are actually living and posting from outside Ireland ?
I know one is actually American from previous discussions
@mikethecop its people like you that will destroy him not the result of any trial.
No he did it all himself his choices equals his consequences .
I'm sure people are worried about whats been posted on an Irish discussion forum.
lynching ?
but isnt that a blatant flat out lie gatling ? nearly every post you make at this stage has lies in it , whats your secret ?
your reveling in the destruction of some ones life based on lies and half truths that you are spreading for god only knows what reason . its people like you that will destroy him not the result of any trial ,
Remember hands up dont shoot mike brown , except it was all racist lies from criminal scumbags, and yet still a man and his family's lives are ruined for the sake of a mob made up of people just like you gatling
shooting unarmed people ? one who produced a gun and aimed it at him tow others who were actively engaged in attacking him and also in rioting ?
you keep pushing that he punched a girl with no proof of evidence of any kind just because it fits you rabid narrative
Even brandishing a gun in self defence can lead to a witch hunt, as the McCloskeys have found out(another high profile self defence case as of late) they decided to plead guilty on a misdemeanour charge but this wasn't good enough for them. Now they're seeking to remove their law licences and effectively their ability to earn. For merely brandishing a gun on their own property to deter 'protestors' 'intruders' whatever you want to call them.
Of course this post and the last 4 have nothing to do with Kyle Rittenhouse.
Charles Manson has had multiple women "fall in love" with him.
That's also quite true.
Ted Bundy say no more
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/86b2bf519a78c14958c9040117dc4dc1.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://www.boards.ie/applications/dashboard/design/images/banned.png)
