Ok your choice, if its common knowlege as you claim then I don't really see what's the problem
Because for one thing you could be a cop.
And for another, his name might be common knowlege, but the people involved aren't.
I wouldn't share that anywhere, especially after the supposed revelations that people have harrased them. If that's who is referred to of course.
I'm not a guard obviously, forget about any names then. Tell us what exactly his confession was? What did he say he did?
Why's it obvious? There's been a few on this thread previously. It's widely known that the gardai have people monitoring forums and social media.
Why is it a problem for you that the Gardaí would know about this? If it`s common knowledge locally (it clearly isn`t and jack842 isn`t the first local that as come on here and said they have never heard of it) then the Gardaí already know all about it. Oh right....the big cover-up.
Did you actually read what he/she said to me?? It was personal, incorrect vitriol. That I'm a lonely female that has the hots basically for IB.
Sorry, but that is trolling. It's unacceptable.
I acknowledge that you have brought a lot of personal time and research to this thread Scooby, but we have to be big boys here. Bringing in the Mods will only end with the thread locked.
I agree. I also didn't start it mate. There's no need for personal attacks, and I think this particular thread is probably the best on the Web that I've seen. Theres always been differing opinions but no trolling or drama, just good discussions.
Surely you, as a concerned citizen who would like to see justice served, should have reported this weighty local information that you have about a murder to the Gardaí?
i know more than you with your 'gards'. I know some questions are being asked as to who is giving information from a murder file to be posted here. And what else i know won't be posted in a public forum,
So your a cop too?? At least we know where we all stand.
no i am certainly not a cop.
Most reasonable people on this thread have come to understand the absurdity of the case against Ian Bailey. Anyone that's peddling it now has an ulterior motive, people like Nick Foster with a laughable book or others who may well be encouraged by some on the 'other side' who would be very embarrassed if the real perpetrator was ever found. This is highly unlikely, one only has to consider that were a number of retired Guards to give evidence to the Drew Harris investigation that there was information in the missing pages in the jobs books that pointed towards someone in particular, their evidence would be dismissed because of the passage of time. This allows people like Nick Foster, who seems to have inordinate resentment towards Ian Bailey to do as he pleases. It seems there is a serious envy there, most likely because Bailey is so many things that Foster would like to be but isn't. People should remember that most of the leading 'journalists' in the UK red tops have been Oxbridge grads writing in vernacular, as it were. It's hard to credit how people get away with that kind of contemptuous condescension but stirring the shite is a highly profitable business. Foster probably thinks we're all muck savages.
Similarly, people like @tibruit should be dismissed out of hand as they have proven over time that when pressed on any of their more fantastical notions they disappear.
"dismissed out of hand"....sounds like something an Oxford grad would say. I suspect it`s just because you`ve been watching too many Hugh Grant movies though.
"Most reasonable people"....don`t you know that Social Media is really just a haven for the delusional and permanently outraged to gather together and convince themselves that what they think is really relevant and that they are in the majority. "Most reasonable people" are in fact the silent majority who have normal lives and can`t be bothered to get into it with irrational people like yourself.
Of course she could have something to hide. If she lied to Gardai during the investigation and were new evidence to come to light resulting in Bailey's conviction, she could be charged with perverting the course of justice. Bailey still exerts a strong influence on her and she remains fearful of him. It is concern for her own safety that prevents her from speaking out.
She will never be charged with perverting the course of justice. She hasn`t a clue where he was during the eight hours he wasn`t in her bed on the night of the murder. She chooses to believe his bulls!!t. It`s not a crime.
Bailey still exerts a strong influence on her and she remains fearful of him
ailey still exerts a strong influence on her and she remains fearful of him
that is just speculation. "remain fearful" implies she was fearful in the past. He assaulted her but she said they put that behind them. There is no evidence she is under his influence or fearful of IB
incisive as ever.
Have you ever tried stand up comedy? You'd be good, just speak your mind
😀...
Ah feck....I wanted to be Hansel.
Looks like the West Cork Podcast creator's think Foster is lying anyway. Would trust them more than anyone on their knowledge and impartiality.
It would be interesting to know if the wine bottle or the hire car had any fingerprints recovered? I mean, if there were none, as in the house, that would indicate a clean up.
How long would it be expected to be able to retrieve fingerprints from a bottle, exposed to the elements?
It was found about a mile away and about four months after the murder. It's not even known if the bottle has any connection to the murder.
Would the car have been valeted by the car hire company before she collected it? If so then it wouldn't have any significance if only her fingerprints were found in the car.
Foster must either be desperate for money and has a financial interest or he has a personality issue wan wants to be in the centre of attention. I'd say it's maybe 70 - 30%.
Foster is certainly not going to find the killer and find new and compelling evidence for a conviction which stands up in court, at least not how he's behaving.
he has some personality issue anyway. Listening to an interview paraphrasing he said it was his job to find the killer or he realised it was up to him. Words like that i cannot recall exactly
Looks like a lot of bracken/growth where it was found if the hands were sticky/dirty they could have been still there. As for only Sophie's then fair enough, but none?
I'm sure there are plenty prints on it
“I found it at a place that I pointed out to Detective Sergeant Walsh at 3.50pm on Wednesday, April 9. I picked up the bottle and I saw that it was a full bottle of wine. I left it where I found it and told my parents about it when I got home.” The next day he went with his father to the spot. “I collected the bottle and showed it to my father. He examined it, and decided to take it home with us. My mother rang the gardaí at Bandon and told Garda Kevin Kelleher about it. “This is the same bottle of wine that I now hand over to Detective Sergeant Walsh. My fingerprints, and that of my father, may be on the bottle. My mother's fingerprints may also be on this bottle
https://www.reddit.com/r/MurderAtTheCottage/comments/qjmp51/irish_independent_gardai_investigating_discarded/
Only3 sets then?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wa.vanillicon.com/v2/a04babac7ef9d681628a280d81c51a1e.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bd89cdce15309a6ec2dff928c865017a.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b1891d95e9e926c005ad3f5c153aacc5.svg)
