No you don't. You come in here endlessly fantasizing about 1984 crapola when you know it's all horseshit. There's no other reason you'd dodge questions, deliberately avoid detailing your conspiracies, and engage in all the usual shenanigans.
However many..
They've turned you against them..
Fair enough, I agree on that re vaccination stats. However the current outlook re Covid Certs & disabling them to force boosters is my concern. I don’t see an end to that if it’s implemented.
however many??
its qualifiable, but maybe you cant understand that as you dont understand what "factual" means.
They are the ones who have turned against society.
Every single vaccine denier that I have met tries to explain their reasons but every single one, to a man, have given selfish ill informed reasons... many which are repeated throughout this forum.
i have absolutely no problem at all when these selfish people are ostracised. means i dont have to listen to their ignorant crap when im socialising.
What he said was that there are technologists who are trying to give vaccines the ability to repair faulty ill-ness-causing genes. That is NOT the same as saying that the Pfizer vaccine is currently conducting gene editing. It didn't take long to research the claim made by whoever uploaded the video:
Fact-checking...what do you guys have against it? Oh yes...the fact part.
(Let's not even bother addressing the silliness of why the such a high-up in Evil Genetic Corp would happily fess up to his nefarious plan in a video interview.)
The rudeness of this post is quite staggering.
do you complain if you have to get a tetanus booster when your first tetanus shot runs out?
We should round them up..put the on trains..send them to camps to teach them how to concentrate..
hahahahaha
thats the best you can come up with 😂
ignorance is not something to aspire to CQD, be better
But you are wrong. You know you're wrong because you've had to tell lies pretty much constantly to pretend you aren't wrong.
If you hope you are wrong, why are you lying about things?
That doesn't make any sense.
What I think is happening is that you don't actually give a **** if you're wrong or what's true. Reality isn't important to you. What's important is that you can play pretend and make believe you're an expert.
However when we point out all the lying you do, this makes you very upset, which explains all of your childish behaviour.
It might be excusable if you are a teenager, but I suspect you are much too old for this sort of thing.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I've never seen anybody get agitated about a new flu vaccine being made available every winter.
i do not hold my tongue when dealing with ignorance and stupidity. i dont care one jot if you think im rude or not, hopefully being so blunt will actually get you to understand some very basic facts.
you made the same point over and over yet you didnt even understand what you were trying to say.
you used that misunderstanding as a reason to form an ignorant opinion that covid certs didnt work to stop the spread of the virus.
so after this encounter you will either take on board what youve been shown, or you can choose to remain ignorant and spread the same lies again
your choice.
You've never had to prove you had a flu vaccine to go to the pub..
You've never needed 3 flu vaccines in 6 months before either..
Erm... Somebody explained gene therapy earlier... Why aren't you willing to admit that you pushed outright nonsense?
Lol. What a petty and pedantic thing to whinge about.
We have people on this thread telling lies and spreading misinformation about the vaccines and covid measures, yourself included.
And you're concerned about "rudeness"?
you dont get 3 covid jabs in 6 months
do you actually know anything factual at all?? or is it tweety birds in that head of yours?
Well..their double dose didn't get them through a winter..
It's not voluntary if not taking it means you can't take part in society. And even taking it means you can sit inside, but still have to wear a mask, socially distance and show a cert everywhere you go.
Just on a virus with a high mortality rate, Bill Gates warned the other day of a smallpox terror attack. And the FDA recently approved a drug against weaponised smallpox:
Bill Gates and his prediction: After COVID-19, bioterrorism may follow | Marca
FDA Approves New Drug Against Weaponized Smallpox (webmd.com)
Certain posters have long histories. Those who serially avoid questions, repeatedly lie, consistently use the same dubious sources, ignore explanations, never thank posters for solid information, accuse anyone who questions their view of being trolls, knowing repeat the same debunked arguments in other forums, engage in repeated toxic behaviour, etc, etc, etc
Other posters can lose patience with them or be curt
That's not to excuse any rudeness or impatience, but there can be context behind it.
staggering comeback.. is that what youve been reduced to :D
So you've given up on your lies that the covid vaccines aren't vaccines but "gene therapy" then.
And now, you're pretending that yet another of your bitchute link dumps has been completely ripped appart and you're hoping that people will forget how embarassing it was for you.
When you are tempted to do your next link dump in place of having some original thoughts of your own, maybe try and remember this example, and all of the others before you do so.
And maybe ask yourself, "Why am I lying about things to pretend to be an expert for people who know for a fact I'm the exact opposite of an expert?"
And again a transparent attempt to deflect to a new topic.
I suggest that no one take @Gortanna's latest bait and instead press him on answering the question he said he was going to answer.
He said he would provide a reason for why masks would be permanent. We're still waiting.
your reply is hard to respond you cos you basically make a load of statements unrelated to what I said.
I am wondering if you even speed read what I wrote.
There are no such thing as "vaccine objectors", these people are simply morons
how do you distinguish? some take all vaccines regardless, some take some (on a case by se basis) , some take none.
Are the latter 2 groups I mentioned the same thing? strange analysis if they are.
I'd be in middle group on the basis , illness differ, vaccines differ so they aren't the same. to blindly take them all is moronic.
even the current case of covid - despite there being evidence that young men are more at risk of side effects to the heart than covid - you think they are morons to say - I'll pass boss. surely not? why would you insist on that, very strange of you.
If there was a new infectious virus tomorrow with a 50% mortality rate, there would still be anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers and anti-lockdown types
sure thing ! take your rage at others (you called them morons) and invent a scenario that doesn't exist and throw them into that and assume they will keep the same decision despite the variables changing dramatically .
sounds stupid or even moronic to reuse your parlance. you the pot or the kettle?
For the 100th time, there are many common sense restrictions in life.
You can't "take part" in going to work in a hospital if you aren't vaccinated. You can't get on a building site without a hardhat. You can't mention "bomb" in an airport. You can't get a job as a pilot without a medical. You can't bring an unvaccinated pet in X amount of countries. Etc, etc, etc.
If your co-worker is unvaccinated by choice, they are putting you, and your co-workers, and, by extension, your older family members at increased risk. Not only that, but that co-worker is putting themselves and their own family at increased risk. Through their own belligerence, ignorance and gross selfishness they have increased the risk to themselves and others. Part of the reason we have enforced restrictions is because these types of people exist.
by saying the below - you clearly didn't read the post or basic comprehension eludes you.
I hope it's just a mis-reading of my post.
Vaccines are not mandatory, no one is forced to take them.
Sigh, the insistence on replying to posters who never reply to him. It's a pain seeing that he's replied again. Comes back to the problem with the Ignore function. Can only half ignore. Still have to see when they've replied.
But it's better than nothing, I suppose. You'd think a poster would just not reply after a while, but that's not the case here.
I don’t like what the bad people are saying as it disproves what I said
Lol. You're replying to me now man. It's also really funny that you seem afraid of mentioning my name.
But again, you have never actually replyed to any of posts. You might have responded, or quoted my posts, but you never actually addressed the content. You constantly dodge and evade. You do this to everyone's posts, and especially for points you know you can't address. For a specific example, you keep avoiding the question of why masks would be permanent.
Now, you are just not responding to my posts (most of the time) on top of not actually addressing my points. Functionally there is no difference.
My goal remains the same, to point out to other people who are reading the form when you claim things that are false, when you outright lie and when you fail to address points and questions.
Other people see these points and they see that you aren't able to respond to them.
Ignoring things you don't like and make it hard to believe your falsehoods don't make them go away. Reality exists independantly from what you want to believe is true.
And again, your latest whinging is yet another attempt to deflect from the question you said you were going to address.
Looks like that was a big ol' lie too...
ah the old "i cant reply as i have you on ignore" excuse :D
I actually think the ignore function is weird. Why would anyone not want to hear differing opinions?