just noticed a lot of these articles in the British media over the last few weeks https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10118013/Nightclub-spiking-victims-ordeal-left-semi-paralysed-highlights-risks-women-facing.html
While i believe "spiking" does occasionally happen, I wonder how many of these stories are people who voluntarily ingested substances but do not recall ingesting them because they were intoxicated
And to repeat from earlier, you were invited multiple times to agree with the statement that "spiking does happen and it is wrong to automatically assume that every girl who says she was spiked is a liar". You refuse to do so. That is your choice.
How about you try to explain the difference between subgroups (2) and (3) above before you try to drag things down some prurient sidetrack. I anticipated that this is where you wanted to go so I divided it up to make it easier for you to understand
Why is it ok with you to challenge the two females who didn't get tested, but fine to accept the two males that didn't get tested.
You are pretty fond of calling people liars.
You aren't people, you are a person 😉 also I like demonstrating it Don, as above ^^ on multiple posts where you have lied and refused to actually support what you believe was posted versus your interpretation.
If you don't like that label? Report the post or refute it and remember, context matters.
I couldn't give a shiny shite if they were male, female, martian or came from Uranus. The thread is about spiking, not gender studies. I'm talking about spiking, you are on some white knight gender crusade. Guess which one is the "prurient sidetrack" in this thread.
I couldn't be arsed running around reporting posts like you do you yourself.
I know what my friends told me about what they went through. Some randomer on an anonymous message board saying I am lying is hardly going to change that
So no, no report as if I'm wrong? I'm certainly breaking the rules?
And no refutation because you can't be arsed?
Grand, says it all really 👍
You carry on charging those windmills buddy 🤷
Well you are free to explain to us the other factors in the otherwise apparent inconsistency between it being ok for the 4 to be challenged and the 2 not to be by the poster.
I will also invite you to agree with the statement that "spiking does happen and it is wrong to automatically assume that every girl who says she was spiked is a liar".
You can agree, disagree, or ignore. Up to you.
I'm free to do many things. Interpreting posts from other posters for your gender crusade is not one i'm going to waste time on. Spiking does happen occasionally, and it is wrong to assume anyone of any gender is a liar.
So back to the topic at hand, the 2 ladies you know who were tested after being spiked. What drug/s did it show that they were spiked with?
Anything else in their medical histories that you'd like to have to help you get your jollies?
You made a fair attempt at disguising the refusal to agree with the statement. I'd give it a 2 out of 10. As I said, you are free to ignore it in its entirety if you so wish
You claimed they were spiked, i'm asking what with. I don't need access to any medical records. The burden of proof lies with you.
We went through this already. As you well know because you had a hard on for it back around page 12/13. It's none of your business and it's actually also none of my business and would not be my place to disclose. And it is completely irrelevant. There are probably plenty of websites where you can go to read stories of such incidents if that is your thing
So there is absolutely no evidence of them being spiked. That is all you needed to say.
Logic is not your strong point it seems
It's not happening, mass hysteria at this stage fueled by clickbait led and social media.
We haven't come far from the Salem Witch trials
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem_witch_trials
As I previously mentioned to another poster, I think that it's fairly **** to imply that any girl saying she was spiked is the equivalent of a girl accusing a specific person of being a witch in order to have them killed.
I walked around my old college campus recently and they had plenty of posters up informing people and telling people to take care. That's hardly a bad thing in practice now is it? To be aware of all dangers and to keep your wits about you in general and look after your buddies on a night out if they need help. Not exactly hysteria now is it?
I deal in facts and evidence. You have neither in your little anecdotes.
You are going to have to sate your prurient desires elsewhere.
Details of other peoples medical records and police reports are none of your business
All those words to say "I have no evidence".
Pick one which doesn't offend you
So the colleges shouldn't be putting up posters advising students to watch out for their buddies if they appear intoxicated or to seek out their own buddies if they themselves experience symptoms such as blurring of vision etc. I would class it as good advice to any 18/19 year old and common sense for anyone.
I am unclear why it offends your sensibilities so much that they might do so. Hardly "hysteria" though.
Nope. All of which says that Fandymo isn't entitled to all the gory details.
Same as how you posted on another thread that you have hypothyroidism and a big belly. You will notice that you didn't upload any evidence of medical diagnosis of same. Because you don't have to. And, perhaps seemingly strangely enough to yourself, nobody demanded it.
I have no issue telling people I have to take Eltroxin. Anyone can google it and see it is a drug used to treat thyroid issues.
You are claiming spiking, yet only have second hand anecdotal evidence, not even the name of a drug used in the fairytale spiking.
"My friend was spiked"
"With what?"
"Can't tell you it's private medical blah blah blah"
We have no evidence of your fairytale excuses for a big belly other than you were able to google for the name of a drug that is used to treat some hypothetical condition
"I deal in facts and evidence. You have neither in your little anecdote"
Laughable. Welcome to my ignore list.
"So there is absolutely no evidence of them being spiked you having this condition. That is all you needed to say."
The thread is about spiking, not the posters in you old college and whatever they say
Is it unreasonable to ask you for 'facts and evidence' for what you're saying?
That's what you have been demanding of people who report a possible spiking, why is your situation different?
The two situations can hardly be compared. Someone who makes a spiking allegation effectively implies a crime was committed against them.
It is an entirely different situation than a medical condition that does not impact anyone else but the person. If the poster had claimed that their condition had been caused by some specific event then they would have to provide more information to validate their claim.
I'd be happy enough to know what drugs these people were allegedly spiked with, i don't (despite Donald's wild accusations) need to read their entire medical history. OP has refused to say. I believe that there were no drugs found, therefore no spiking. I've been happy to say what drugs I've to take for my hypothyroidism. I'm not demanding anything that would be identifying etc. The fact that he cannot say what they were spiked with, to me, shows that he's telling tales. If one of my friends were spiked i'd ask them the exact same question. What were you spiked with? Would you not?