This isn't context. We don't know where you posted it and in what circumstances. If you are e.g. posting articles related to Swine Flu in a Corona thread and the mods have warned about it, then it may have been removed. Antivaxxers consistently dredge up any vaccine injury or death from the past 100 years and evangelise them in order to try and fearmonger about vaccines, typically while playing the whole "I'm just concerned about vaccines" line. People are wise to these techniques and some forums/mods/threads crack down on it.
I don't see how it's related to this thread, but maybe you have something to say regarding measures being permanent.
I clearly stated that they are not measured in the same way - not that they aren't measured at all. And if they aren't measured in the same way, then comparison is misleading, false and meaningless.
I can't afford one.
Why dont you get a gofundme going.
I mean if you can prove it I'm sure funds wont be an issue to get.
There are enough eejits out there that would help you finance one, and if you win you’d get your costs paid. So it sounds like a cop out seeing that you know better than everyone else.
Yes youre right I was posting in a corona vaccine forum about a swine flu vaccine.
Totally unrelated. The mod had no option but to warn me.
What's worse. I linked to an article bring up events from the last major vaccine drive in 2009. That's 12 whole years ago? Obviously I shouldn't be mentioning any events pre 2020. What sort of freak looks at past performance as a guide to potential future outcomes?
And now I've posted it in the boiling frog thread. I should move it to the vaccines thread where you can ignore the elephant in the room there too and pepper me with useless and inane questions instead of reading the article and coming to your own rational conclusions about how sensible it is to vaccinate everyone in Ireland over 12 with an experimental drug developed in 6 months.
I'm out.
Statistic are statistics, not interested in whatever mental gymnastics you perform with dismiss whichever ones don't fit your personal narratives
You have any coherent explanation as to what measures will be permanent? Or is it, as I suspect, another Covid denial dump session
Some would view it as treasonous.
I mean if you know you can save the country but aren't bothered doing it. Thats just failing the country.
What's the elephant in the room? Millions of people have had the vax now with no bad side effects... So what's your point,also the article you linked is about a totally different vaccine.
Also what does it have to do with this thread... What covid measures are going to be permanent and why?
Currently we are at masks and covid passports which will be permanent until they are not... So not permanent.
even worse....billions
bye felicia
And there it is, the mask slips and the anti-vax speech commences, replete with victim complex.
Hey, any progress finding that evidence you said you had?
You know where you claimed that asymptomatic infection didn't exist.
You demanded I provide you with evidence for something, yet you seem to have forgotten this.
Is it because you can't actually provide the evidence you said you had and aren't honest enough to admit it?
Waffle and mischaracterisation.
No one here has asked for proof.
We ask for evidence when conspiracy theorists claim things as fact. If they can't provide that evidence then it's their problem and maybe then they shouldn't claim things as fact.
Nor have I any desire for "Big Pharma" to be the "good guys". What a bizarre thing to claim.
And again the only people who have attempted to quash questions here have been conspiracy theorists.
I already told you that I have so much less than zero respect for you that I won't indulge your nonsense.
When do we call time on this? To date not one poster has given any adequate explanation as to what will be permanent nor why. No credible conspiracy theory.
Lol asking people to back up their claims is "nonsense"?
You demanded evidence from me man. You've been asked repeatedly to provide your own.
But you keep dodging and crying about how you don't have to.
I'm sure this tactic works on other kids, but for adults they see right through it.
You were lying. You have no evidence to support your claim that asymptomatic infection doesn't exist. That claim is also a lie.
Telling fibs is wrong man. Why do it?
I think if they're still dodging and deflecting by the time it hits 250 pages the thread should be closed.
Now it's just become a dumping ground for any antivaxx rambling that's rightly not allowed anywhere else.
Just pretend that King Mob isn't listening anyway and tell the rest of us about your evidence. We promise we won't mention it to them if it makes you feel happier about it, but the rest of us would like to hear your case too.
Why won't you tell us?
When it goes back to normal..
It was supposed to be 2 weeks like..
And anyway..the vaccines obviously haven't worked..covid seems to be more prevalent where there were more extensive vaccination programs according to a recent harvardstudy..there was never a vaccine for a coronavirus before..there still isn't..
That new definition of herd immunity is obviously boll0x too..
I'll plug my ears and turn around and all.
What evidence do you have that the vaccine doesn't work?
What about the studies that have been provided repeated that shoe the vaccines are effective?
Are you just going to ignore questions again, vanish for a while and then post again when you feel like posting something huffy?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/
"Covid is still around so the vaccines don't work".
The majority of posters who adhere to Alex Jones style conspiracy thinking are also anti-vaxxers, do you think that's a coincidence?
Once restrictions are lifted do you think these people will just "change" their views. They won't, they'll just rationalise something else "It was a test", "the real restrictions are coming in the future", "look one country reintroduced a restriction, we told you", etc, etc.
You mean Alex Jones who was telling you it came from that lab a year before anyone else?..
Who said they were going to lock us all down due to a pandemic in 2011?..
Who spent years claiming Sandy Hook was a hoax, while his listeners harassed the relatives of slain children, then admitted it was all a lie
The guy who has made millions from his conspiracies, you believe that piece of ****?
Well, was he right about the lab?..
They're making the frogs gay too..
That study does not support you claim that the vaccines don't work.
That study says:
" Importantly, other non-pharmacological prevention efforts (e.g., the importance of basic public health hygiene with regards to maintaining safe distance or handwashing, promoting better frequent and cheaper forms of testing) needs to be renewed in order to strike the balance of learning to live with COVID-19 in the same manner we continue to live a 100 years later with various seasonal alterations of the 1918 Influenza virus."
Do you agree with this part of the conclusion?
Well, it's being as pro vaccine as possible while recognising the evidence..
If the high vaccine take up areas are still high covid areas they're not working..
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wa.vanillicon.com/v2/afa86289e513a2013ca0bb778681b4cd.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/43d5d8eb6f74f970975eb821385072d4.svg)