Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Options
1306307309311312757

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,564 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    Actually going to visit the border, would be a good start.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Nope. That’s not a policy.


    Its pretty clear you’ve no idea.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    That’s not a policy. Or even a strategy. It’s something you have inferred that no one ever said.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And what do you think she would change about her strategy after going to the border?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭BobHopeless


    The deflection form the Joe worshippers here over what's happening at the border is laughable. A typical example of "my guy can't be wrong" head in the sand thinking. They are every bit as bad as the loons who supported the orange turd.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I literally sent you a document of the strategy to fix the border and asked you how would you improve it, and you ignored that question. The only one deflecting anything, and the only one with their head in the sand, is you.

    I know you guys only like to read headlines so a 20 page PDF must terrify you more than vaccines. Just treat it like a very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very long headline and you'll be fine!



  • Posts: 7,713 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Here's Joe pretty much telling people they'll be let stay if they come..

    Like it's obviously political opportunism, and an attempt to reinforce 'orange man bad', but that's why there's a hape of people at the border now..



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    He doesn’t say everyone will be welcomed in and allowed to stay. Only the most biased mind could take that away from that answer.


    The reason there are so many people at the border is way more nuanced than you seem to believe. Even when the other lad was President and was putting kids in cages there were people at the border.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,464 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    She has visited the border. Do you expect her to go there every week or what?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Apparently she should be at the border to manage it.


    i wonder sometimes do they expect her to be checking documents and stamping them herself.


    My engineers are in Oregon, Korea and Taiwan right now. It’d be some amount of flying to manage them all if this logic was true.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭BobHopeless


    She's expected to manager the situation. Do you think she is?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,055 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Hang on!

    Is this a new one? Are ya gonna call it Biden derangement syndrome? Lol

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,451 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    And she is. Apart from going into Mexico itself and stopping people from getting near the border, what do you think she should be actually doing to stop people trying to get access to the US?

    America is actively seeking to give itself advantages over its neighbours, which while perfectly reasonable in isolation, means that people in the less advantaged country will always look to better themselves and their families. It is the American way.

    So removing jobs, moving production, cutting aid etc, will all have an impact on the number of people looking to get access to this better situation.

    Simply putting a gate or fence and telling people its illegal won't stop them because the rewards far outweigh the risks. When you feel you have nothing to lose, why would anything be a deterrent?

    So what exactly do you think Biden, or indeed Harris, should be doing? Remembering that Trump did almost everything he could to make it as complicated and inhumane as possible and still it didn't stop the flow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    You're clueless as to what to actually do with the Afghanistan withdrawal when you said it was a shambles, and now it seems your clueless in this situation. Care to explain how you would go about managing the situation and enlighten us as to the tools available to Harris to action this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    Thats a silly argument. People don't know how to fix cars but they know when its not working, thats why they go to a mechanic. These issues are real and just because non-elected people don't know how to solve them doesn't mean they cant criticise/question the people who campaigned and got votes saying they could solve these problems or at least handle them better than their political opponents. I don't think you would have made this argument against those who criticised the previous administration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,055 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I don't know how to break it to you, but fixing a car is not the same as resolving decades of complicated international policy.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    Really !? whoa, you really did something there.... 🙄

    Its an analogy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,055 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    How so ? Because someone doesn't have the solution to the Afghanistan issue and the Southern Border issue they shouldn't criticise those who's job it is to do so ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,451 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Yes, but there is a big difference between knowing something is broken and just not accepting that something isn't possible.

    No point complaining that your car can't do 200kph is there? So it all fine saying something should be done, but based on what? If you don't understand the key components of the problem then your opinion that it should be better is based on nothing and while it may be right, its probably wrong.

    So saying something like 'Harris should manage the problem better' doesn't really mean anything without some ideas as to what 'better' means.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,016 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    A car is a series of mechanics. If something mechanical is broken, it's straightforward to fix once it's been diagnosed and the part can be replaced.

    There's nothing straightforward regarding America's issue with illegal immigration. It's far more complex, which is why the car analogy is nonsense and ill-thought out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    In my opinion its not a reasonable argument that a poster shouldn't complain about "their car" not working or that "their mechanic" isn't doing a good job because they don't know how to fix it themselves.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    I agree it's very complicated and a very sad situation for those caught in the middle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,016 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Your opinion is worthless because it's based on a false equivalence.

    What is it with some people these days that they can't simply reconsider a position or statement? Instead they have to dig their heels in and double down on it because it's their "opinion".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    So you do think that unless I personally have policy solutions to Afghanistan and the Southern Border I shouldn't criticise the people in charge of these issues ? Strange position but you are welcome to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,016 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I didn't say that. 😉

    People are free to be critical of what they are critical of. But it helps when one is trying to make an analogy with something for it to make a modicum of comparative sense...and yours doesn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,451 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    And to be critical one surely must have some idea how it should be better. Going back to the car analogy, its like going to your mechanic and saying 'the car just feels a bit odd' and expecting them to sort it out.

    People know when a car isn't working, because they have driven it before, have been in other cars etc. You are offering nothing to base your opinion that the border should be fixed. Just that something is wrong, and something should be done.

    With that lack of detail then the problem will never actually be fixed as you have no idea what the problem is never mind what the solution would look like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,016 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    And to be critical one surely must have some idea how it should be better.

    Well, no. Not necessarily. One can be critical of something without having to automatically offer a better way or another solution. It can often help if the critic can be of assistance in improving things that aren't working but it's not a necessary requirement of criticism.

    However, if one is going to offer an analogous comparison, it's generally prudent to think it through lest it looks a bit silly when it's scrutinised and the car analogy falls apart with incredible ease.

    But let's be honest here. Some people are only interested in criticising Kamala Harris simply because she's Kamala Harris, and anything she does at all will result in the knives coming out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    You didn't like the analogy, fine, I don't really care but you seem to agree with my point so thats grand.

    "Well, no. Not necessarily. One can be critical of something without having to automatically offer a better way or another solution. It can often help if the critic can be of assistance in improving things that aren't working but it's not a necessary requirement of criticism..."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,016 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's not about me not "liking it". Your analogy just doesn't work. It's simplistic, ill-thought out and falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. The fact that you're desperately trying to cling onto it, though, speaks volumes.



Advertisement
Advertisement