Intrigued now... do go on... and it better not be leprechauns!
There would have been so many Ford Fiestas in any area of Ireland at the time that it's unreal. There would have been alot of blue hatchbacks and alot of blue Ford Fiestas.
I am unaware of numerous such witnesses but regardless, no expert saw the scratches or photos of the scratches to make such a determination, so such remarks have no foundation.
The Garda descriptions of the scratches are inconsistent and do not clearly describe briar cuts.
A dermatologist 5 days after the murder noticed nothing amiss on Baileys hands because they were scratches which had healed by then. Not briar cuts which would still be visible.
If you have received a scratch, on the first day they are at their least visible, just red scrapes.
Bailey made no attempt to conceal the scratches something which could easily have been done given the time of year with gloves and long sleeve tops.
Apparently Bailey got these cuts from briars at the scene but magically left not a trace of blood fibers or hair there.
This is all dealt with on the DPP report and it accepts Baileys account of the scratches.
So you just ignore the numerous witness statements who saw the scratches and said they didn't think they could have come from cutting a tree? Sure thing.
Thread is going round in ever decreasing circles now.
So here's a tangent, nothing to do with Ian Bailey .
I'm thinking ; if Bailey is innocent, and the neighbour living next door didn't do it, no French hitman , no randy Guard, no passing stranger.
Could it be the result of a very Irish problem ?
There is a clue in this image from the aftermath of the murder;
I got scratched to hell climbing Sitka spruce (face too). I suppose you could avoid scratches if you want... Like if you were a Garda reportedly trying to "prove" something by saying 'I climbed a tree and got no scratches'.
I saw a picture of the tree which was referred to (with a Christmas tree size cut from the top) and yes I could get scratches of that too if I climbed it.
I don't know what you mean by "this was not proven", it doesn't need to be proven, that's like asking a guy where did he get the black eye and he said it was from walking into a door. Then you say 'well I walked into a door and no black eye so I'm proven right and your statement is unproven!'
BTW where was the photo of these scratches?
That drawing by the Garda looked 5hite
deleted
Supposedly Ian remarked on Alfie's lights being on viewed from Hunt's Hill driving back from the pub. I think Jules contends the guards made it up.
and there was a quote he said "something terrible will happen tonight" not sure if this is hearsay or verifiable
Did one of the documentaries claim that when Ian and Jules got back on the night of the murder, Ian looked over towards Sophie's house, saw lights on? Did it claim that he said to Jules that he thought there might be a party on and suggested going over but she said she wasn't interested?
I could be completely misremembering here BTW.
It is an audiobook on Audible released 18/05/2021.
P.S. I am not bothered if you are male or female.
And I doubt you are a Garda chatbot running on a supercomputer 😉
Turing's original "Imitation Game" was an observer deciding which of two entities they were questioning remotely was a woman and which was a computer trying to imitate a woman.
1011000111101101110!! 0100110 11101001 10****1 😂
Look up the original Turing test.
Well there you go, i thought it meant Ian Kenneth Bailey Out.
Dont be so niave. I refuse to accept garda reports because on numerous occasions they have been shown to have been corrupt & lied in this case. Court cases subsequently have been based off these lies unfortunately. Gemma O'Doherty's article is relevant because it makes sense on a number of points, points which you refuse to even consider & would explain a lot of the garda incompetence in this case. On top of this the garda reports and statements from so called witnesses have in many instances been retracted from those who gave them alleging garda corruption & malpractice. (Martin Graham & Marie Farrell to name a few)
Only a fool would go along with the so called official reports in this case.
People assuming MoonUnit is a guy makes you laugh? Please clarify what you mean.
Is that the first book from years ago? That had a few glaring errors in it. It described the two wine glasses as a myth when they were clearly visible in crime scene photos.
Ah yes, those were the days when you would give the postman a glass of whiskey on his last Christmas delivery, he would be driving too. Must have been absolutely pissed by the end of his run.
And on Sunday evening the postman was delivering to Alfie! Complete nonsense. There isn't even Saturday delivery in Ireland.
At that time of year there would be post delivered Sat and Sun
There would have been a postal delivery on the last Sunday before Christmas so that part could be right.
ian Bailey is totally the same person who runs the arsenal fanatics Twitter page that has been randomly fighting his corner.
Same writing style with the spaces before apostrophes and full stops.
Relistening to the Michael Sheridan book.
If you can give it credence it looks like Sophie gave a lift to a tall guy seen in the car at a Skibbereen petrol station where he paid £10 for petrol .Which is odd in itself as rental cars normally have a full tank. But then later at Ballydehob the garage attendant says Sophie was on her own buying firelighters.
Then Sheridan says Sophie was at the Ungerers at lunchtime but Yvonne Ungerer said in her statement Sophie left at 5.45 p.m.
Which is puzzling Sophie would then go to the pub for 15 minutes. Surely a well-to-do French couple would have fed her?
Then he has a long list of phone calls which didn't seem to leave much time to read the book by candlelight.
And finally Sheridan writes Sophie was booked on an Aer Lingus flight to Toulouse on Christmas Eve when there were in fact no Aer Lingus flights to Toulouse in 1996 at all.
I feel sorry for the actor who had to read it out loud for the audiobook.
Spot on.
There are oddballs, then there are the weirdos, then the insane, then the "howl at the moon" mad. And then, in a category of their own, there are the twitterati..............
It's I Keep Buggering On.
Christ there are some strange people on twitter. Some of the people replying to his tweets seem borderline insane.
What does the O in IKBO stand for assuming the IKB are his initials?
gets stranger all the time
IB's Twitter.
I don't know if Hogan was good friends with Jules. Where is this story coming from?
I think Michael Sheridan mentioned in his book that he is good friends with Hogan also. Very strange that Hogan waited until now to give this important information to the gardai. Again another twist in this story that somehow doesnt seem plausible. Was Hogan and Jules good friends?
Ive only seen his name mentioned in 'Death in December' written by his friend Michael Sheridan.
One of the articles when the story broke said the same man had already given about 6 statements over the previous years but now gave a 'consolidated' statement that took over 3 hours.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bd89cdce15309a6ec2dff928c865017a.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b1891d95e9e926c005ad3f5c153aacc5.svg)
