I didn't really say any of that.
But your defence of the Gardai at all turns is bizarre. "Like, what could the pathologist know?" errm, ok
As I said already, I think you, rather ironically, exhibit many of the same errors in thought that the Gardai did in effing up the whole thing in the first place.
It makes me laugh people assume MoonUnit is a guy.
You said ‘moving the body might have helped build the case against Bailey’, there’s no evidence or any real basis for that.
It was Harbison who collected the hair in her hand, took samples from under her nails, noted the depression under her head that showed the most fatal blow had occurred right there. He noted the blood drops on her clothes were round, which shows they either fell from the killer’s hands or clothes or the murder weapon while she was on the ground, or blood had landed there from horrific blows to the head. If they fell while she was running they would be elongated. This information might have been lost, interfered with or destroyed while the body was moved.
Nothing has ever been put forward to my knowledge which says the request to move the body was motivated by anything other than to save embarrassment for the delay in the pathologist getting there, making the journey easier for him and for the dignity of the victim and pain for the family to know she was still lying beside a ditch.
It's all in that Twitter users tweets and replies. In relation to the community, something to do with Jules ex husband arrest and what he was up to.
im totally lost. the twitter link is some random arsenal fan??
i did not assume it
IB has outed cheesmaker Bill Hogan as the person who made the 3 hour statement.
Hogan said this one to the Irish Times
Surely that should be multi-story. Meaning she was living a lot of separate lives. Rather than she thought she was a car park.
It was complicated, on many different levels. 😉
where did you see that? It is interesting. That trashy Death In December mentioned Hogan knew Sophie well, often had a glass of wine with her. Was Hogan questioned before during the investigation?
One of the articles when the story broke said the same man had already given about 6 statements over the previous years but now gave a 'consolidated' statement that took over 3 hours.
I think Michael Sheridan mentioned in his book that he is good friends with Hogan also. Very strange that Hogan waited until now to give this important information to the gardai. Again another twist in this story that somehow doesnt seem plausible. Was Hogan and Jules good friends?
Ive only seen his name mentioned in 'Death in December' written by his friend Michael Sheridan.
I don't know if Hogan was good friends with Jules. Where is this story coming from?
IB's Twitter.
gets stranger all the time
What does the O in IKBO stand for assuming the IKB are his initials?
It's I Keep Buggering On.
Christ there are some strange people on twitter. Some of the people replying to his tweets seem borderline insane.
Spot on.
There are oddballs, then there are the weirdos, then the insane, then the "howl at the moon" mad. And then, in a category of their own, there are the twitterati..............
Relistening to the Michael Sheridan book.
If you can give it credence it looks like Sophie gave a lift to a tall guy seen in the car at a Skibbereen petrol station where he paid £10 for petrol .Which is odd in itself as rental cars normally have a full tank. But then later at Ballydehob the garage attendant says Sophie was on her own buying firelighters.
Then Sheridan says Sophie was at the Ungerers at lunchtime but Yvonne Ungerer said in her statement Sophie left at 5.45 p.m.
Which is puzzling Sophie would then go to the pub for 15 minutes. Surely a well-to-do French couple would have fed her?
And on Sunday evening the postman was delivering to Alfie! Complete nonsense. There isn't even Saturday delivery in Ireland.
Then he has a long list of phone calls which didn't seem to leave much time to read the book by candlelight.
And finally Sheridan writes Sophie was booked on an Aer Lingus flight to Toulouse on Christmas Eve when there were in fact no Aer Lingus flights to Toulouse in 1996 at all.
I feel sorry for the actor who had to read it out loud for the audiobook.
ian Bailey is totally the same person who runs the arsenal fanatics Twitter page that has been randomly fighting his corner.
Same writing style with the spaces before apostrophes and full stops.
There would have been a postal delivery on the last Sunday before Christmas so that part could be right.
At that time of year there would be post delivered Sat and Sun
Ah yes, those were the days when you would give the postman a glass of whiskey on his last Christmas delivery, he would be driving too. Must have been absolutely pissed by the end of his run.
Is that the first book from years ago? That had a few glaring errors in it. It described the two wine glasses as a myth when they were clearly visible in crime scene photos.
People assuming MoonUnit is a guy makes you laugh? Please clarify what you mean.
Dont be so niave. I refuse to accept garda reports because on numerous occasions they have been shown to have been corrupt & lied in this case. Court cases subsequently have been based off these lies unfortunately. Gemma O'Doherty's article is relevant because it makes sense on a number of points, points which you refuse to even consider & would explain a lot of the garda incompetence in this case. On top of this the garda reports and statements from so called witnesses have in many instances been retracted from those who gave them alleging garda corruption & malpractice. (Martin Graham & Marie Farrell to name a few)
Only a fool would go along with the so called official reports in this case.
Well there you go, i thought it meant Ian Kenneth Bailey Out.
Look up the original Turing test.
1011000111101101110!! 0100110 11101001 10****1 😂
It is an audiobook on Audible released 18/05/2021.
P.S. I am not bothered if you are male or female.
And I doubt you are a Garda chatbot running on a supercomputer 😉
Turing's original "Imitation Game" was an observer deciding which of two entities they were questioning remotely was a woman and which was a computer trying to imitate a woman.
Did one of the documentaries claim that when Ian and Jules got back on the night of the murder, Ian looked over towards Sophie's house, saw lights on? Did it claim that he said to Jules that he thought there might be a party on and suggested going over but she said she wasn't interested?
I could be completely misremembering here BTW.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b1891d95e9e926c005ad3f5c153aacc5.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bd89cdce15309a6ec2dff928c865017a.svg)
