First, he didn't try to coerce the DOJ to lie to the American public to help Trump overturn democracy. Why do you continue telling this lie?
And yes, he is the leader I want. I can distinguish between what is really important regarding Trump the effective executive and Trump the pompous blowhard.
The article you linked to says that Trump "gets credit for economy", and its evidence for that is a Wall Street Journal article in which 68 economists instead actually said that Obama should get most of the credit.
Would you like to try again with that? If you're "through reading them", there must be loads of articles that you read that backed up your opinion. Would you care to link to a handful of them?
The date on that article is 14.1.2018. Less than a year had passed since Trump was inaugurated. So the piece was built on anecdotal evidence. And, as such, is meaningless. Since then, factual evidence based on yearly figures shows that Trump did indeed balloon the deficit.
Because it isn't a lie, it's what happened, and you can scream lie lie lie all day
I said I'mm tired of this topic for almost 4 years now between Trump and Obama. I know what I believe and lived through. As did 70+ million other voters. If you want to take that as a win for you... then so be it... You win.
The overwhelming majority of those 70 million people voted for him only because he was the republican nominee, not because of who he is or what his policies are, and you are fully aware of that.
Be honest, you've never read a single article in full if the headline of that article suggested something good about the Democrats, have you? I wouldn't even be surprised if you haven't even read that article you yourself linked to. You just Googled "trump good economy", saw the headline and posted it without reading it, didn't you? Otherwise, why would you not post a more sensible article like one that didn't just look at his first year?
Your claim that you've read many articles that suggest Obama should get credit for the economy is not true, isn't that right? The fact that you were objectively incorrect about the effect of Trump's policies on the unemployment rate in fact would also give credence to the possibility that you've never read any article on America's economy, unless it's from one of those right wing rags that you like to copy and paste from of course.
He very clearly did. You admit that yourself, but throw in some nonsense about context. Of course you were not there so you are only guessing the context. I am still struggling to understand any context where democracy can be ignored and torn up for the sake of one man.
I would be interested to see if you apply context to everything. Illegals are only coming across the border because of the terrible live they have. Context.
BLM only held marches and some people undertook violence (although few actual guns so in your head it doesn't count anyway) because they felt oppressed. Context.
Hey, this is easy. Everything can be allowed once context is given. Abortions should be fully allowed since the woman needs it. Context.
people only sell drugs because of the need for money. Context.
So what are the qualities you are looking for?
Honesty? No.
Integrity? No
Ability to deal with a crisis? No
Financial management? No
Cutting down government? No
Healing division? No
Forward planning? No
Personal responsibility? No.
Delivery of an agenda? No
But if you want to base your opinion on the amount of others, then surely the 80+ million that voted for Biden is even more persuasive?
He repeatedly tried to coerce several officials over several different departments (eg. Electoral officials, DoJ, Federal) to claim the election results were corrupt, false, rigged etc, over several months.
Again, no matter what context you think you can put one sentence of Trump's in, his own actions and words over the course of several months gives all the context that is required.
On tape too. In his own words. Spoken by him. Again, on tape. For all to hear as often as they like.
It takes some serious bending of reality to avoid coming to the conclusion that he wasn't accepting defeat and tried everything, no matter how illegal, to remain in power.
Erm... You've expressed numerous beliefs that don't match reality. So you're not exactly great at being objective.
You assume too much. Here is where I often go to read about a topic. You might want to try it and learn something.
https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news
That's an aggregator, has no editorial on the articles which they list
I swear they're putting something in the water of the democrat controlled liberal cities that represent a good chunk of that 80+ million (or so they claim). 🙄
ir so they claim? Think someone is swallowing conspiracy theories.
By they I presume you mean the US Congress that confirmed the votes?
Going on the Covid figures of red vs. blue states perhaps it's the vaccine?
So not only did Trump fail at all the other measures I listed, he also failed at protecting the very democracy that is the cornerstone of the nation.
Wow, I never thought you would accept that Trump had failed so completely.
To be the POTUS that oversaw that complete dismantling of democracy is quite the legacy.
And you want him back as POTUS because why? To ensure that democracy is completely destroyed?
So as you claim to have read many articles that suggest that Trump's economy is simply a continuation of Obama's economy, you should have no problem explaining why you have dismissed the content of said articles. Off you go.
And as you have also have claimed to have read many articles that say the opposite, you will have no problem in linking to a handful of such articles, seeing as how you think I should try and learn a thing or two. Off you go.
I see you might have trouble with comprehension. I said after 4 years I'm through arguing it. It's just an exercise of opposing forces pissing in the wind.
I just realised it's August, isn't trump meant to be 'reinstated' by now?
Right. You're not giving any details on how his "just declare the election corrupt and leave the rest to me and my buddies" issue. What about Trump makes him an effective leader, for you?
And by "effective leader", I don't just mean someone that supposedly restored employment on an unprecedented level (which he didnt). What was it about his general conduct as President made him someone that you'd want your kids to aspire to? Do you see him as someone that you'd say to your kids "Look at that man, kids. That guy is someone to model yourself on".
Genuinely interested to hear your opinions on his social media trolling, belittling of other people and spreading of conspiracy theories, for example. Or his blatant selling-out of the US intelligence by siding with Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence agencies. That's documented on video, many times over. In his actual words.
Edit: Or, his "I just need to find 11780 votes, which is one more than we're behind" statement to Brad Raffensperger. Again, captured on tape. Not much escaping from that one, to be fair.
Great. You can just link me to just say 5 or 6 of those many many articles you've read over those tiresome years so I can read them at my own convenience. Or do you no longer want me to learn something?
And my comprehension skills are perfectly fine, thank you for your concern Mr. Copypaste.
Oh no, maybe Donnie can give him a dig out 😁
Certainly explains the attempt to raise his profile. Shame for him that he's had to make himself look like an absolute fool in the process.
1) see who is representing him? Lol
2) Cute that he thinks he gets to have a choice. Subpoena the SOB and grill him
3) hillary had more balls for testifying as she did during benghazi than this utter snowflake had in his entire presidency. Let's see if he can finally man up
That's enough to make you feel.... down 😎
More fake news i guess??
I mean, they're really giving the game away with the last paragraph of that letter, essentially saying that they won't try to block the DoJ officials from testifying so long as no-one on Trump's side (anyone in his administration) is called to testify.
"Officer, I agree to let you search my house for drugs, on the condition that you don't search the room that has the poster of Bob Marley on the door."
Not sure if I recommend this, but here's Mike Lindell being interviewed by the left-wing host David Pakman. It's off the charts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X66pxQHGIJ4
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/d78fd5f5292e11c2974bcd779ad2a2f0.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
