Henry... wrote: » Bailey will be acting irrationaly a lot of the time due to his alcohol and drug use His actions after the murder wouldn't be expected to be those of a normal person
threeball wrote: » He must be some man if he can be up all the previous day, out drinking in the evening, get home late, go for a 4km walk, kill someone, walk back, not show any sign of agitation, finish an article for a paper and stay up the entire following day travelling back and forth to the cottage.
MoonUnit75 wrote: » I’m aware of the criteria. I am amused that you would go so low as to call someone who repeatedly put their partner in hospital, busted their face, beat them with a crutch, kicked them with a plaster cast on their foot, blamed their victim for the extreme violence, drove while drunk on several occasions, drove while on drugs, never held down a job more than a couple of years, isolated their partner from their children and grandchildren who refuse to be in his company, regularly demands silence and attention in a packed bar so he can recite his simple minded poems, ‘joked’ regularly about carrying out a disturbing murder, a ‘flawed personality’ :pac:
odyssey06 wrote: » It's James Bond stuff. And don't forget, also do this while leaving no car tracks, footprints, fingerprints, hair samples, blood, DNA... While in a beserk drunken frenzy.
Deleted User wrote: » You're just looking for something to be offended by here. How exactly must we refer to his personalty in the future to satisfy you, MoonUnit75? A flawed personality is not good enough, tell us what we need to say?
Henry... wrote: » Has it been proven he wasn't driving
MoonUnit75 wrote: » I’m not asking you to say anything. I just think we need to reflect on what IB would actually have to do to merit a worse description than a ‘flawed personality’.
tibruit wrote: » Utter nonsense.
JP Liz V1 wrote: » The case should be reopened here with fresh eyes by hopefully competent Gardai, the Gardai on the original case need to be reprimanded and all the liars prosecuted The lost the gate with blood on it, that takes some doing.
MoonUnit75 wrote: » How do you know he didn’t show signs of agitation when he got back? He has shown no signs of agitation after being arrested for a murder he says he was being framed for, discussing beating his partner close to death or the excruciatingly deranged ramblings in his diaries being read in open court. We don’t know when he wrote his 500 word article, it was not actually due the next day as he admitted himself and could have been written any time in the preceding week. We only have his partner’s statement that he was up and about again at 9am, JT daughter just said they both went out at some time during the morning for 2 hours, he could have been back in bed by 5am and woke up at 10.30am for all we know. Larry Murphy beat and kidnapped a woman, drove her to various locations, raped her repeatedly over the course of the night, tried to kill her, got chased off by two hunters who saw his face, drove home and had sex with his unsuspecting and heavily pregnant wife and was cool and collected when the gardai arrived at his house next morning.
Xander10 wrote: » How much of that is fact? Yes he was out drinking with Jules. Jules recalls him getting out of bed around 3 am. He went to do some writing. A bit strange to believe, given he was drinking heavily in the evening up to midnight. Not very plausible. The only thing Jules can verify is him bringing her tea at 9 am. "Look I'm home." If you accept the above, which is what you allude to. No one can verify what IB actually did between leaving the house at 3 am and showing up at 9 am.
odyssey06 wrote: » Nope, she had not already clearly met Bailey. If she clearly already met her, please provides the dates times and locations. If it was that clear, I assume it was documented even by the keystone cops investigating the case. Expecting to meet him again? Nope, that's something you just made up. It's not at all clear Bailey knew her. Alife thinks he introduced them but not certain. This is a combinaion of conjecture and stuff you have made up in an entirely baseless and groundless manner.
Deeec wrote: » Many men think they are gods gift to women - it doesnt make them murderers though. Has he tried it on with other women though? If he had this reputation there must be women out there who he has creeped out.
Gussie Scrotch wrote: » Speculation on top of speculation. Still no motive and nothing to place him at the scene.
threeball wrote: » Cmon, Larry Murphy was a serial killer and serial rapist. A completely different character. Many people met IB the following day and none described him a looking tired or out of sorts.
odyssey06 wrote: » Apparently it was a 'frenzied' attack by Bailey. Yet somehow left no blood, DNA, fingerprints or hair at the scene. Bailey provided hair, blood, fingerprint samples to AGS. Nothing was matched to him. No blood. No fingerprints. No DNA under the victim's fingernails. No matching hair samples on the victim or on these famous 'briars'. AGS think Bailey is a suspect because he had scratches. Beggars belief. This is more than incomptence. This is a deliberate attempt to pervert the course of justice by the investigating members of AGS. Pages ripped from the evidence book which would have shown this up.
threeball wrote: » You missed the point. How likely is it that a man can go 2 days straight without sleep, commit a murder and carry out one of his busiest days ever conducting phonecalls with editors and meeting other journos whilst being as normal as IB can be.
MoonUnit75 wrote: » No motive or evidence to place anyone else at the scene. It had to be someone, whose motives are not obvious to us. That does not exclude IB.
unplayable wrote: » I believe the man in the car with MF that night was a local man who she was supposedly having an affair with and he is now dead. He was protected by the gardai for some reason.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bd89cdce15309a6ec2dff928c865017a.svg)
