Gussie Scrotch wrote: » I've been thinking about this. The bread on the table, the breakfast material in her stomach and the fact that there was no light on in the house upon the arrival of the Gardai. It all points to the time of the attack being in the morning rather than late at night. the absence of a burning light, in particualr, suggests that it was daylight when Sophie left the house.....so around 9am say If we assume that this was, indeed the case, then the "sighting" at Kealfadda bridge is irrelevant and IB can be ruled out, because he brought Jules coffee at 9am.
orangerhyme wrote: » Good point about the bread being out. She kept a tidy house so looks out of place. It's possible she was still up and hadn't gone to bed yet. Her last contact was an 11pm phone call with her husband. I wonder about other details such as was her bed made. Was this mentioned anywhere? She was found in night attire so the assumption she got out of bed to answer the door but maybe it was morning and she was already up. I find the whole case frustrating. The lack of any DNA especially. Can they send evidence off to a lab in the states for further analysis? The gate at the bottom of the passage was closed, so anyone who called to her would've touched it surely but the gate goes missing!
Deleted User wrote: » Thanks, but I'm not sure a Reddit post counts as a validating source for info.
Mackinac wrote: » In The Times (London) and The Independent it is referenced as being unopened.
Deleted User wrote: » Thanks. I see it now. "It was interesting that, months after the murder, a bottle of wine was found in bushes near a laneway close to Ms Du Plantier house." An interesting quote from that Independent article: 'One source close to the investigation recalled that, at the time, alcohol was often stolen from the drinks cabinets of empty holiday homes.'
FrankN1 wrote: » Well he knew where she lived and commented to his wife that there may be a party on next door at the neighbours on the night. It's a hard place to get to by all accounts so this is an important point. I'm pretty sure the witnesses said they were definitely not consistent with an injury from cutting a tree and a turkey. Did they even test his nails for DNA? Admitting it is actually evidence. Not many people go around saying these things. It's not admissable but definitely important that it happened many times and not just a once off. Most suspects did have an alibi actually so again this is vital. His own wife said he got up. And he was spotted near the scene until that statement was retracted. The lack of other suspects obviously points to him. If there were other sightings of different people or any evidence of other locals going to the home, it would bring his guilt into further doubt. Knowing about a murder in a very rural place hours before it has spread to the community is actually crucial for obvious reasons. The gardai didn't collect anything really and messed up the crime scene. I'm not saying he's 100pc guilty, I'm saying it's the most likely scenario based on the current evidence which is circumstantial.
SoulWriter wrote: » The gardai lost the wine found in the ditch too. I didn't know that. Pathetic
Yurt! wrote: » There must be an awful sinkhole in the evidence room in Bandon Garda Station. Gates, suspect files, investigation logs, wine bottles. They really aught to see to that.
Garlinge wrote: » There was talk of her having a bed on a raised platform so she could view the Fastnet lighthouse but there was a photo of an unmade double bed that was not raised up. In one of the TV accounts there was a photo of the raised bed that seemed to be a single on and it was unslept in. I cant remember if that photo was taken at time of murder. What was the poem that was opened in book on the table?
el Fenomeno wrote: » How much of a "dispute" was there with the neighbours? A few have mentioned this - but how serious was it? Is it documented anywhere whether it was more of a few passing comments about the gate, or a full on argument/feud?
mioniqa wrote: » And also who was the guy in the Netflix doc talking about when said he spoke to the gards about someone he had suspicions about. So many questions.
Yurt! wrote: » I think his point was the community went a bit like the Arthur Miller play The Crucible, and people started going to the Gardai with old grudges, tittle tattle and shaggy dog stories such was the level of paranoia. I can only think of the rural area I grew up in, if something like this happened there, the place would melt down with all the recriminations flying from old axes to grind, and like everywhere, there's more than enough local oddities to go around to point the finger at. Bailey in my view became a canvass for everyone's fears and I'd be sure enough some of the stuff reported about him are tall tales and Chinese whispers. Sifting through the b*ll**** is one of the challenges of this case. Even 25 years later, half baked rumours and uncorroborated stories about him are still being churned up and beamed worldwide on the world's biggest video platform. You can see the challenge for the guy to keep his sanity and salvage his name.
mioniqa wrote: » Yeah I’d like to know that too. I definitely read the word ‘feud’ which to me is a serious matter. A previous poster linked to an article in the Observer. I can’t believe the Gardai lost the files of other suspects. The incompetence is staggering. I’d love to know who they are. And also who was the guy in the Netflix doc talking about when said he spoke to the gards about someone he had suspicions about. So many questions.
EltonJohn69 wrote: » I have only watched the Netflix series is worth watching murder at the cottage or is it basically the same doc ? Also have no idea if Bailey did it ! All circumstantial… if the things I said drunk were taken seriously I would face a long time in the slammer.
[Deleted User] wrote: » We have a glaring lack of trustworthy information on this thread. Can we trust the media, reporters hated Bailey and were subsequently sued by him. Can we trust the Gaurds? Seems not. The Sheridan documentary? The Netflix documentary? The DPP report is probably the most reliable source of info.
unplayable wrote: » Ep 3 of the Netflix show is an absolute hatchet job on Bailey my god. Crazy stuff.