Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Seek someone in their 20's if you seek a Walton's type finish in your life.
Yurt! wrote: » This is a common theme with some female friends of mine. They spent their twenties capriciously botching viable relationships with pretty good men as they move up the dating hierarchy (as they see it). They get to their early 30s and think they've found their Disney prince with the job/money/status/house/looks all ready to roll. Turns out the prince will trade them in in a heartbeat for the young one that just came in on the graduate programme. Tears, heartbreak and confusion. The game suddenly doesn't work for them anymore. Then they're the above age (34-38) on dating sites and trying to snare any man that isn't a serial killer and can hold down a job. It's the exact age the power in the dating market flips on its head and is fascinating, if a little grotesque to watch. I've seen it play out several times in my peer group.
Minime2.5 wrote: » The decline of their sexual market place value when mens is at its peak is very sobering for and hard to accept for most women
Potential-Monke wrote: » Ah, it lasts long enough imo, but that's just me being greedy and not having to wait even longer to re-enter the dating scene. My luck I'll wait until I should be well clear of being able to have kids, and then get someone pregnant. I've only once seen a woman tick the "doesn't want kids" box. Unfortunately, I didn't meet any other criteria. If women really don't want to have kids, they should just say it, it's absolutely acceptable today, even if it's still getting the usual are 'are you sure?' and related questions. Would make my search a bit easier at least... *sad face* That's what I've been telling myself for years. I don't want kids. I know that 100% now. And I believe I've always felt that way, deep down, but was keeping up appearances and saying what I thought people wanted me to say. It wasn't until my 30's that I decided to not be what society wants me to be. And adoption is definitely a helpful deciding factor. If I find myself older and regretting, I can adopt a kid that's beyond the baby/toddler stage (genuinely hate those stages, I don't even hold babies, ugh.... ). Or at least, I can apply. If the adoption crowd still don't think I'd be a good father, then my suspicions will have been right all along - I would not make a good parent.
kowloon wrote: » I got the impression that there was still vastly more men on dating sites than women, even in the mid-30s onwards.
Hannibal_12 wrote: » Just browsing some dating apps and there seems to be a legion of women with desire to have kids "someday" which is fine obviously except most of these women are 37/38+ give or take even well into their 40s. Only on dating apps due to obvious reasons and I'm surprised by it.
Government buildings wrote: » Once a woman can have a child with a man he is no longer essential to the relationship. Indeed, she has no need for him at all, as the state provides the financial security necessary to raise the child.
kowloon wrote: » Would we not be seeing women opting solely to go the sperm donor route if this was true?
Deleted User wrote: » Adopting an older child could be very challenging. If you don't want to be a parent then why would you even consider adoption? A newborn would be a damn sight easier than a possibly troubled child who had been in and out of the care system.
Minime2.5 wrote: » Just remember. A kid is not just for Christmas
[Deleted User] wrote: » My fathers mother was 42 when he born,his father was 49...they had a few more after him....a lad i went to school with father was in his 70s at his 21st,his mother been over 60 aswell....and they had/have a great relationship 37 isnt over hill.by any means and technology & science.as regards frezing eggs/fertility/surrogates etc etc is well known by now
[Deleted User] wrote: » I'm struggling to see the point of this thread. Women wanting kids and openly stating it is trapping someone? It's a valid thing to want in life, and it narrows down the interest they receive.
knucklehead6 wrote: » Did anyone even consider the possibility that these profiles were set up quite some time ago and the only thing that gets updated is the picture??
Yurt! wrote: » This is a common theme with some female friends of mine. They spent their twenties capriciously botching viable relationships with pretty good men as they move up the dating hierarchy (as they see it). They get to their early 30s and think they've found their Disney prince with the job/money/status/house/looks all ready to roll. Turns out the prince will trade them in in a heartbeat for the young one that just came in on the graduate programme.
Tow wrote: » I thought women in the their late 30's looking for a man for children was thing of the past, in this modern era there are other solutions. In the last year or so, two of my female relations in this age range have independently (they are different sides of the family) given up looking for Mr perfect, and gone the AI route. A few meetings with the 'AI Man' (to us the farming term*), with no messy relation ships. One of them was so pleased they did not wait long before deciding to have a second baby. * 'AI Man': PC brigade, I acknowledge they can be women as well and probably are in a medical clinic. * AI does does not stand for Artificial Intelligence :-)
SnuggyBear wrote: » The point is women in her 40s on a dating site saying she wants kids has missed the boat. It's not that hard to understand.
Sardonicat wrote: » No, she hasn't.
SnuggyBear wrote: » Good luck to her
Sardonicat wrote: » Do you think menopause automatically occurs in all women at 40? Average age for menopause is 51. Why do you think that women in their 40s who dont want to conceive require contraception? If it's so utterly impossible why dont their GPs tell them there's no need?
silverharp wrote: » increased risk of miscarriages, having *mod snip*, it is basically the last chance saloon