nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

alchemist33

I've seen two main options put forward on this forum, (1) that he'll remain a political force until the 2024 primaries start up and the Republicans have to take him seriously or (2) that he'll be so mired in litigation that he'll have no time for politics.

There are of course other options for the next 4 years - prison, exile, death or ill-health (he isn't young and he's been under stress), no politics but a business success, emperor. But it'd be an interesting exercise for people to lay their cards on the table now and make their predictions.

Personally I think his political influence will die quickly after the Capitol fiasco but someone else will emerge in 2 years, once the memories have waned, to be the standard-bearer for the QAnon wing.

Threadbanned:
Real Donald Trump
12gauge dave
Sweetemotion
Timberrrrrrrr
Cognitive Dissident
arthursway
Wojtek the Bear
BornTobyWilde
Tonesjones
BruteStock
tooka
brenbrady
naughtyboy
DubInMeath
extra gravy
Briabnwilldoit
Yurt2
Notnattynate
SnakePliskin
lizzyjane
erlichbachman
Tony EH
RobbieV
Kermit.de.frog
Enter Name here
Piskin
Applehunter

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

notobtuse

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

where did the DC media say this? do you have a link to DC media saying this?

DC media??? What in the world are you talking about? Unless you're talking about the enemy of the people being the Washington Post? If so just read the link and come back with anything in it that's not the truth. Good luck with that.

Leroy42

Mic 1972 wrote: »

You can find a lot of negative stuff about Rumble on Wikipedia too.
That's usually a good sign, it means that mainstream media are feeling threatened ;-)

When lots of people abandoned Whatsapp for Telegram, Wikipedia updated their page immediately with lots of negative stuff about Telegram
they think we are stupid LOL

On hold. So you're basis for thinking something is good is that if the MSM have something negative to say about it?

So in your world cancer is perfectly fine? I mean the MSM all say it can be dangerous.
Or nuclear waste, is that all a conspiracy? Flat earth, I mean everyone seems to agree that its a globe, except for some non msm sites, so I can take it you believe that?
I mean you have to.

And surely the fact that the entire GOP support Trump must mean its a conspiracy? I mean the GOP are the estabhishment right, so them supporting something must mean its a cover up.

[Deleted User]

notobtuse wrote: »

DC media??? What in the world are you talking about? Unless you're talking about the enemy of the people being the Washington Post? If so just read the link and come back with anything in it that's not the truth. Good luck with that.

Beautiful, just beautiful. You provide a link suggesting Washington Post said this and that, but then can't provide the link of Washington Post saying this or that.

You yourself just admitted that you did not even bother to check if your right wing rag made it up or not and just assumed it was true because it agreed with your agenda.

Leroy42

Mic 1972 wrote: »

the stuff about Telegram is still on Wikipedia, under the section "use by fringe groups".
you won't find anything like that on the wiki page about whatsapp, maybe we should all believe that fringe groups don't use whatsapp?

Ah, so you think that everything should be classified the same?

What % of users of each of Telegram and WA do you think is made up of Fringe groups?

ohnonotgmail

notobtuse wrote: »

DC media??? What in the world are you talking about? Unless you're talking about the enemy of the people being the Washington Post? If so just read the link and come back with anything in it that's not the truth. Good luck with that.

the DC media in this quote. Who are they? what did they actually say?

The DC media is suggesting @GovRonDeSantis failed to provide resources to Surfside. The mayor of Miami-Dade, a Democrat, was asked about this on Meet The Press and said it's not true: "Not only has the state of Florida been here in force (...) we've not lacked for any support."

[Deleted User]

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

the DC media in this quote. Who are they? what did they actually say?

It's weird that he was confused as to what DC Media was considering he quoted DC Media twice in his post.

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

It's weird that he was confused as to what DC Media was considering he quoted DC Media twice in his post.

'tis a mystery

notobtuse

Deleted User wrote: »

Beautiful, just beautiful. You provide a link suggesting Washington Post said this and that, but then can't provide the link of Washington Post saying this or that.

You yourself just admitted that you did not even bother to check if your right wing rag made it up or not and just assumed it was true because it agreed with your agenda.

It's literally staring you in the face. Look at what Hannah Dreier, Washington Post reporter, says. You don't even need to click through anything. I'm starting to think you aren't worth any more of my time since you seem to ignore everything you ask of me.

extra gravy

Mic 1972 wrote: »

You can find a lot of negative stuff about Rumble on Wikipedia too.
That's usually a good sign, it means that mainstream media are feeling threatened ;-)

When lots of people abandoned Whatsapp for Telegram, Wikipedia updated their page immediately with lots of negative stuff about Telegram
they think we are stupid LOL

Christ, you really shouldn't be let anywhere near the internet.

[Deleted User]

notobtuse wrote: »

It's literally staring you in the face. Look at what Hannah Dreier, Washington Post reporter, says. You don't even need to click through anything. I'm starting to think you aren't worth any more of my time since you seem to ignore everything you ask of me.

You're still refusing to provide a source? Wow.

I ignore everything of you? Is it that supposed to be sarcastic? I asked you for a link, where is it?

It would be staring me in the face if you provided a link. Like, literally staring me in the face.

Mic 1972

Leroy42 wrote: »

Ah, so you think that everything should be classified the same?

What % of users of each of Telegram and WA do you think is made up of Fringe groups?

irrelevant

my opinion, lots of nut cases on both

Mic 1972

extra gravy wrote: »

Christ, you really shouldn't be let anywhere near the internet.

am i invading your safe space?

Leroy42

Mic 1972 wrote: »

irrelevant

my opinion, lots of nut cases on both

Ah ok, at least you acknowledge that its just your opinion.

Based on no actual facts, or any thought. But it is your opinion so I assume you think it has some relevance?

Do you think every opinion is of equal value and that anything can be said once its simply classed as an opinion?

Beasty

extra gravy wrote: »

Christ, you really shouldn't be let anywhere near the internet.

Mic 1972 wrote: »

am i invading your safe space?

Cut it out, the pair of you

Stick to discussing the topic

Tippex

notobtuse wrote: »

It's literally staring you in the face. Look at what Hannah Dreier, Washington Post reporter, says. You don't even need to click through anything. I'm starting to think you aren't worth any more of my time since you seem to ignore everything you ask of me.

You really are a hilarious individual considering you have avoidance of answering questions down to a fine art and then throw tripe like the last sentence.

Quin_Dub

notobtuse wrote: »

Trump is playing the attack dog leading up to the 2022 election, IMO.

If I were a betting man I'd put my money on Florida governor Ron Desantis to the the GOP candidate in 2024. The mainstream media is already reporting almost 100% negatively about him, and even making up lies to make him look bad. A good indication he's the best shot at this time for 2024. And I think Trump will support him in the end.

For 2022 , Trump will do more harm than good for the GOP to be honest. He will want to make it all about him and a sort of proxy re-run of the Presidential election. The "Base" will love it of course , but that won't help win them back either chamber.

They need to be making it about the here and now and focus on things that might actually matter to people next year. Trump won't be interested in that, if it's not about him he doesn't care.

In the case of DeSantis and 2024 , I think that's what the GOP would really like to happen but it's out of their control if it happens or not.

Donald Trump has never done anything in his entire life for someone else so the idea of him supporting or maybe even stumping for another GOP POTUS candidate is unlikely in the extreme.

If he's not running he will either be completely silent or he will be screaming and shouting telling everyone that he was robbed of the nomination and that they are all RINO's blah blah blah.

Trump being involved in the GOP will not gain them a single extra seat anywhere , in fact he's more likely to lose them seats.

But like I said , it's a problem entirely of their own making.

Billy Mays

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1409646474363764742?s=20

Cocaine

ohnonotgmail

Billy Mays wrote: »

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1409646474363764742?s=20

Cocaine

Jesus, could he be any more obvious that he is as high as a kite? Cocaine is a hell of a drug. Very more-ish.

Cody montana

Billy Mays wrote: »

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1409646474363764742?s=20

Cocaine

Looks like someone’s triggered and by triggered I’m mean high.

Mic 1972

Leroy42 wrote: »

Ah ok, at least you acknowledge that its just your opinion.

Based on no actual facts, or any thought. But it is your opinion so I assume you think it has some relevance?

Do you think every opinion is of equal value and that anything can be said once its simply classed as an opinion?

you asked for an opinion, you got one
what official stats do you have about the % of fringe groups using telegram or Whatapp?

duploelabs

Billy Mays wrote: »

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1409646474363764742?s=20

Cocaine

My kids get like that when they eat too much sugar and you ask them who their favourite pokemon is

extra gravy

Billy Mays wrote: »

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1409646474363764742?s=20

Cocaine

The Trumpsters that ridiculed Biden's parenting skills because of his son's drug problem...where you all at?

Mic 1972

extra gravy wrote: »

The Trumpsters that ridiculed Biden's parenting skills because of his son's drug problem...where you all at?

Hunter Biden ? let's not go there

Smee_Again

Billy Mays wrote: »

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1409646474363764742?s=20

Cocaine

Mic 1972

Smee_Again wrote: »

I bet she voted for Democrats

duploelabs

Mic 1972 wrote: »

I bet she voted for Democrats

Oh dear

Smee_Again

Mic 1972 wrote: »

I bet she voted for Democrats

"She" hasn't voted for anyone for a long time.

notobtuse

I get a kick out of an advertisement on this page... STOP TRUMP CAMPAIGN RALLIES. 100,000 Signatures Needed.

Yup... that'll do it.

[Deleted User]

notobtuse wrote: »

I get a kick out of an advertisement on this page... STOP TRUMP CAMPAIGN RALLIES. 100,000 Signatures Needed.

Yup... that'll do it.

So you've given up on that source then? You're openly admitting to posting something made up?

duploelabs

notobtuse wrote: »

I get a kick out of an advertisement on this page... STOP TRUMP CAMPAIGN RALLIES. 100,000 Signatures Needed.

Yup... that'll do it.

Ooooohhhhhhkkkaaaaaaayyyy

Has the kool aid fermented?