notobtuse wrote: » Where did you hear the 5,000 attendance number? I couldn't find that. But you do realize he has gotten 809,627 views on Rumble as of this morning. And that's without most people not even aware he's on Rumble yet. And to show how utterly biased and disingenuous Google is, type in "Rumble Trump Rally" and there's no link in the results in at least the first 5 pages of results. Google should be called before Congress and explain why they shouldn't be broken up.
notobtuse wrote: » Policy positions? You don't think he is still president or has committed to running in the 2024 election race, do you?
Tell me how wrote: » :D:D:D:D You want to call Google in front of Congress in an effort to cancel them because they aren't giving enough attention to a guy who has been thrown off several platforms for spreading dangerous and fake news? Seriously, do you have any idea how snowflake/cultist like this all looks?
Mic 1972 wrote: » Biden wouldn't have filled a tennis pitch, that's the reality
Leroy42 wrote: » You said people were twisting his words. All I asked for was clips that you think are coherent. What is the point of the rally if he has literally nothing to say? What did you like about what he had to say?
VinLieger wrote: » Awww someone doesn't understand how SEO or page crawling works
ohnonotgmail wrote: » i seen clips of it elsewhere.
notobtuse wrote: » No, I don't. But I don't expect Google to hide the results anyone with a 8 grade level to expect in the results when typing in "Rumble Trump Rally." Actually I do expect Google to hide it.
VinLieger wrote: » LOL not how it works at all but good for you for admitting you dont understand what your talking about.
notobtuse wrote: » I think I know quite well what results a non-biased search should produce.
Overheal wrote: » Doesn’t seem like you do. Nobody cares about rumble or Trump or his rallies.
Mic 1972 wrote: » your response suggests otherwise
Leroy42 wrote: » You said people were twisting his words. All I asked for was clips that you think are coherent. What is the point of the rally if he has literally nothing to say? What did you like about what he had to say? You complain about not being given fairness in the MS, yet here you are free to post the things so admire most about the speech and you haven't pointed to anything. All you've got is that he shouldn't be expected to say anything as it years out from 2024. So why do you think people tune in to hear and watch him?
Overheal wrote: » How so? Because I don’t want congress’ time wasted on a non issue that means I care about the non issue? Your argument doesn’t track.
Mic 1972 wrote: » if you dont care abut Trump and his rallies you would spend your precious time reminding people not to care about trump and his rallies
Mic 1972 wrote: » if you dont care abut Trump and his rallies you wouldn't spend your precious time reminding people not to care about trump and his rallies
notobtuse wrote: » No they should be broken up in an anti-trust case by the federal government as they have a monopoly in this country and don't serve the interests of all the American people.
Deleted User wrote: » In fairness, this is primarily laughing about how he's rapidly becoming a pretty diminished quantity.
notobtuse wrote: » In fairness, it appears to be quite the opposite.
notobtuse wrote: » People tune in because he has plenty so say. I have no interest in policy positions since he is not president, nor running. He should be calling out RINOs, and keep Biden and his administration's abject failures in the news leading up to the 2022 election... And that's what he is doing.
Call me Al wrote: » He didn't need to. He managed to not have these ridiculous superspreader rallies and he still won the election. On the other hand Trump held them, gathered and risked thousands and thousands of people, got so sick with covid himself that he ended up in hospital, managed to get everyone around him sick, some so sick they too ended in ICU, and after all that Trump was the loser. That's the reality.
Leroy42 wrote: » Great. That makes sense. So what in particular did he have to say? The floor is yours, your chance to get the reality out to people who cannot see it through the bias of MSM. What issues he is pointing out, issues that have only now come to light since apparently he didn't solve them when he was in office. Or was this, as all prior evidence would suggest, nothing but a greatest hits 'poor me' tour aimed at making him feel better about losing? What did he have to say about Biden's incredible job on vaccine rollout? What abut the record breaking stock market, the record job numbers? What did he have to say about the bipartisan deal on infrastructure, or that Biden is helping get American open for business again?
Mic 1972 wrote: » The reality is that Trump generated both Republican and Democrat votes. Democrats voted against Trump, not pro Biden
Mic 1972 wrote: » the best way for you to know is to click on the Rumble link and find out for yourself
Overheal wrote: » Based on what? The data says quite the opposite of your quite the oppositehttps://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=Trump&geo=US
duploelabs wrote: » The questions about the content were put to the poster, the onus is on them to respond with the answers, not a 'go see for yourself'
Mic 1972 wrote: » I don't appreciate when someone uses a bullying attitude with others, I will always intervene when i see that
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
