Buer wrote: » If anyone could fill me in on the cruising altitude and the flight menu, it would be hugely appreciated.
Squidgy Black wrote: » Looks like as part of their Level 4 lockdown South Africa are going to prohibit all sales of alcohol during the lockdown too. I'd imagine it'll be a long tour for the lads, stuck in a hotel with no drinking.
AbusesToilets wrote: » Any word on whether Cowan Dickie is still touring?
Burkie1203 wrote: » https://twitter.com/balders2/status/1409225446814801925?s=19
RugbyLover123 wrote: » It’s very unfortunate that it was the Boks turn to host the Lions this year and not Oz or NZ as a full tour could’ve happened with fans. Goes against the Lions completely but realistically this tour should’ve been played in the UK once some sort of fans were allowed in and the lack of control on the virus in South Africa.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » I’m getting ominous feelings about this tour folks Not sure if it’ll continue if the saffers are being ravaged with the virus Or even if it is ethical to continue given the state of SA
stephen_n wrote: » Forgot about the Georgia games, don’t know how they slipped my mind. Familiarity and cohesion only stretches so far. Note players reintegrating with the provinces after spending eight weeks in Irish camp. Obviously they will be more familiar with each other than the lions. How much of an advantage that will be without meaningful tests on 21 months. I’d say it would fairly even itself out. A bit like Saracens players coming into the English squad.
TRC10 wrote: » Even if they didn't have 2 games vs Georgia (which they do) They'd still have more familiarity and cohesion after 2 years than the Lions, who haven't player together EVER
stephen_n wrote: » The world champions haven’t played together in nearly 2 years at this stage.
TRC10 wrote: » I can't see that happening. Not only would it mean half the squad won't even play. But you may as well hand SA the series now if they expect 15 lads who've never played together to rock up and beat the world champions. Also, locking 37 men away for a month in a foreign country and not letting them play isn't really a viable option. Anyway, the provincial games are an integral part of Lions tours.
Richie_Rich89 wrote: » How much did Henson as first-choice 12 and Gatland as coach overlap. Not by much, I'd have thought.
TRC10 wrote: » No, Gavin Henson in his early years with Wales. Gatland is a pragmatist. He'll do what he needs to do to win. Roberts, Williams and Parkes happened to be the best 12s he had for that period so he used them and played to their strengths. But in his early years, Henson (who is in the complete oposite mould of 12) was the best he had so he used him and played to his strengths. Te'o went well v the Crusaders and the MABs but as soon as he knew it wouldn't work, he changed it and brought Sexton in and shifted Farrell to 12. Gatland is very much a pragmatist.
bilston wrote: » Agree. Bundee is the sort of 12 that Gatland likes. Even as Ireland coach it was Maggs or Henderson at 12, with Wales it was Jamie Roberts and Scott Williams. The one exception being the last Lions tour in the 2nd and 3rd tests with Sexton and Farrell at 10 and 12, even then he went with Ben Te'o in the 1st Test.
ClanofLams wrote: » Missed the game yesterday, watched today, Aki was one of the best players on the field, himself and Henshaw look very comfortable together. Think he’s in the mix for a test place, if Farrell was nailed on at 12, he would have likely got captain I’m guessing.
youcancallmeal wrote: » There was talk on RTE radio that they might do away with the warm up matches altogether and just play the 3 test matches. I guess it's not completely out of the question, will have to wait and see
Shaka Hislop wrote: » I think he's going to start the first test, Gatland and Tandy seem to love his defensive brilliance.... Farrell is probably looking at the bench in that one
Clegg wrote: » Every time I watch Aki play I'm constantly startled at how big he actually is. He's built broader than most backrows.