bubblypop wrote: » Are you actually comparing Muslims and Nazis or devil worshippers? Really need to up your scenarios game there now Klaz!I
bubblypop wrote: » Let's just be normal here, let's imagine the area turns into a majority Polish area, or Chinese area of Russian area. Do I care? No. On the very off chance that a lot of devil worshippers took over the area I was living in, it would depend on what exactly their devil worshipping entailed, if they robbed my dog for ritual sacrifice, then I wouldn't be impressed, but if it involved sitting around in fancy dress looking like Marilyn Manson and chanting rubbish, then no I wouldn't care.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Now, that's rather pathetic. It's not a comparison, which is obvious. Are you really incapable of not deflecting?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Another deflection since you've (I assume) read my previous two posts to this one, so you know I'm referring to how a localised area becomes changed whereby the rules/taboos/customs of the group become enforced on others in the same area. You don't care because you refuse to consider what's been happening. Just deflect it all away, and return to the comfort of selectively ignoring the changes happening in Europe.
The 27-year-old, the daughter of Libyan immigrants, was born and grew up in south Dublin, but it was her father Ibrahim’s story that sparked the idea for her commission. “The main aim was to show that the Muslim community is part of Ireland and Irish history,” she says.
bubblypop wrote: » And yet you are trying to make a comparison, are you not? That's the point yeah? That the area changes so much by the influx of newcomers that things change? But you see fit to use Nazi and devil worshippers to make that comparison. Which just proved what you think. Why not use a comparison of Chinese people?
bubblypop wrote: » You love telling posters that they are 'deflecting' or 'moving the goalposts ' but none are, they are merely responding to exactly what you write. It obviously was a comparison, that was the whole point of the post, was it not?
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » It is not deflection to not want to discuss your anti immigrant fear porn. It's not real it's your imagined story. Your making up the rules for your fake place with the horde coming and fear and sharia law. What is the name of this place?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Because Chinese people don't enforce their own rules and taboos over the local area as their population increases. Look. Fine. I can't be bothered trying to chase you, when the points being made are so obvious. This is the reason I usually have you on ignore. You refuse to deal with simple points when it doesn't suit, instead, deflecting away from them.
Fandymo wrote: » Sevran, France is one. I wonder what the deflection will be for this one.https://youtu.be/6gZFGpNdH1A
bubblypop wrote: » Noone is deflecting. You made a scenario for comparison where you showed what your inner bias really thinks about Muslims. You are now deflecting, you could have used Chinese people just the same as you used devil worshippers because it was a fictional scenario.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Is that in leinster munster ulster or connaught? Is this more extremist induction material from youtube? I'm not watching your conspiracy videos. Any reputable news sources?
Wibbs wrote: » Eh... you do realise that the video in question is a news report from France 24, a mainstream state owned TV station? A "reputable news source" as you put it. It's not some conspiracy video on Dailymotion made by some bloke in a shed. No doubt you'll find some other "reasons" now not to watch it. Well the questions it raises beget more difficult questions you don't want to hear, or have no answers for. Deflection in 3... 2... 1...
Wibbs wrote: » ... and we have lift off. We are discussing multiculturalism and how this may affect Ireland. As you point out we do not have the generational non native populations yet, but everywhere in Europe that does, sees similar problems with integration, unemployment, social problems and crime that gets worse over time, not better. Every. Single. One. I've asked this before and not one has given an answer that backs up their multiculturalist position. Please point to an example of a "multicultural" European nation where those of darker skin are not more likely to be poorer, less educated and more on the fringes of their society than the native population. Just one example will do. I'll save you the effort, there isn't one.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » No way I'm shocked wibbs. You should report your findings to immigrant Ireland.
I can't believe no one ever noticed before that migrants looking for a better life are poorer on average than the citizens of the country they migrate to. That is truly shocking. Migrants are poor who would have guessed it.
Wibbs wrote: » It's rare enough the first generation are the problem, it's the following generations that bear the brunt of the negatives of this social experiment. Though even in Ireland with it's multiculturalism not even a generation old, we already see the exact same patterns emerging.
bubblypop wrote: » Gas. There was a second generation immigrant to this country posting here not too long ago. Everyone praised him and agreed that second generation immigrants are not a problem!
MikeOxsgreen wrote: » "Everyone"... You'll have a link to the second part of course?
bubblypop wrote: » You're right, my apologies, I shouldn't have said everyone, it was a lot, not everyone.
Wibbs wrote: » If I were to report my findings to the plethora of Irish NGO's sucking from this particular teat I'd wear the letters off my keyboard. Man, you should take up dodgeball. As you point out we do not have the generational non native populations yet, but everywhere in Europe that does, sees similar problems with integration, unemployment, social problems and crime that gets worse over time, not better It's rare enough the first generation are the problem, it's the following generations that bear the brunt of the negatives of this social experiment. Though even in Ireland with it's multiculturalism not even a generation old, we already see the exact same patterns emerging. As a percentage of population who is more likely to be in need and receipt of social assistance in Ireland today; an Asian, an African, or a European? If and when this latest idiocy around the replacement of the already idiotic DP screwup by streamlining migrants into taxpayer funded housing and other social services, who will be more likely to be in need of them? That's before the why should any nation look to bring in large numbers of people in need of charity by the hosts? Then again charity for its own sake is one of the excuses/reasons along with exoticism for its own sake that is put forward my the supporters of multiculturalism.
rgossip30 wrote: » You have no proof the poster was genuine . I remember a poster on another forum sucked in a lot by pretending to be a female Syrian refugee studying nursing here until exposed as a male living in France .
bubblypop wrote: » I have no idea if any poster is genuine about anything. Neither do you. Doesn't change the replies though.
rgossip30 wrote: » You quoted him as being a second generation migrant to prove a point without knowing if he is genuine .