Esse85 wrote: » A poster said Conor had never been bloodied before, several posters including myself pointed out that was incorrect and gave examples.
hawaii501 wrote: » I rewatched it last night, the leg kicks started to really hurt early in the 2nd but thought he was still 'winning' until he wasn't. Surely his cardio will be better this time but hoping he changes from the boxing stance to avoid the leg kicks as he was just a sitting duck for them all 2 rounds. I actually think he'll beat him in the rematch after rewatching it, must be mad!
AbusesToilets wrote: » Watched it there myself, I didn't think he was too troubled by Dustin until the end. Great execution by him certainly, but I McGregor would have reason to feel he can win the rematch. That said, the lack of adjustment during the fight is very worrying. The lack of creativity and variation from him stands in stark contrast to previous years. Hope he can change that.
Mellor wrote: » Reading the posts in context it was pretty clear he was talking about bloodied in the sense of taking excessive damage. ie being a bloody mess like Sanchez, Diaz, or whoever. If we listing every cut and scrape. Might as well include a nick while shaving.
RoryMac wrote: » I watched it back a couple of weeks ago and my impression was that McGregor never looked to like having Poirier in big trouble and although the leg kicks got him that time around I'd be expecting even with adjustments for that his gas tank will let him down. I think McGregor has the first 2 rounds to win it or he's done
Chairman Meow wrote: » I could be proved wrong on this by father time, but honestly, for my money, i genuinely dont think Conor will win against someone as high level as Dustin without switching to a much, much better team than SBG.
yourdeadwright wrote: » I still wonder was Conor injured last time or is he deluded ? Dustin didn't get lucky he just beat him & was the better fighter, In such a short turn around Conor simply hasn't had enough time to do anything dramatically different , Does he know something we don't or is he just deluded to think it'll be different ,
DodoDojo wrote: » It seems like a lot of people are allowing their personal opinions of Conor as a person cloud their judgement of his ability as a fighter.
PatrickDoherty wrote: » He's won 1 fight in the last 5 years and that was against a shot to bits Cowboy, he hasnt a prayer and its nothing to do with him being a scrote.
DodoDojo wrote: » He's still a phenomenal striker and while he has been inactive, it's not like he is on a huge losing streak. No shame in losing to either Dustin or Khabib.
PatrickDoherty wrote: » Personally I think he peaked in NYC when he beat Alvarez, has never looked the same since due to the distractions of boxing, money, whiskey, family and general out of the cage activities and run ins with the law.. His laser left hand is all he has and its been figured out now, he hasn't got a kicking wrestling or bjj game to offensively trouble Dustin, not to mention the cardio, most mma fans can hate a personality but still be honest about their abilities.
DodoDojo wrote: » I mean, if you look at the first round in the last fight, I would give it to Conor and Dustin himself said Conor nearly knocked him out. I just cant see how with that being the case you can count him out. Also while Cerrone is no doubt washed up, that was an absolutely amazing display by Conor. Stunning him with a shoulder shot and finishing him with a high kick. It was an absolute masterclass in striking and to me showed that he has still been evolving during inactivity.
PatrickDoherty wrote: » Cowboy has lost his last 6 and got ko'd 5 times you cant use that as a barometer when judging him imo, I missed Dustin saying he was nearly knocked out where was this and what minute of the fight? I dont remember him ever being in trouble thought it was a very close first round myself.