FrancieBrady wrote: » No again. I am using history to highlighr somebody being selectivy nauseous. I made no comment on the act's
ineedeuro wrote: » Not really, you are using history as a reason for excusing behaviour now. Next you will be making excuses for genocide because "sure the Nazi's did it" That's not how history works, you shouldn't look backwards and say it is ok to do it today because they done the same 100 years ago, we are supposed to advance with time, not just rinse and repeat. That's what the majority of the World expect.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I'm thoroughly realistic about history. I don't engage in pretence about it. Some horrible and nasty things were done by people who found homes and veneration in nearly all pilitical parties on the island. The denial of that is the immoral thing. Adams made a mistake with his brother that he owned up to. My opinion of that should be well known, I have offered it often enough.
ineedeuro wrote: » You seem to be happy to try drag every name in Irish history through the mud to cover up for a couple of lads because they are part of a political party? One of them who had no problem letting his niece get raped for years. Even tried to stop her getting justice.
blanch152 wrote: » As I suggested, take it to the History Forum, in my opinion, it is not relevant to the topic at hand. Edit: P.S. I assume you are another one giving a free pass to Adams and Storey because some other historical figure did something.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Collins killed and maimed...Eamo faciltated multiple abuses by sadists amd pedophiles alike. But you select who to get nauseous about, as I said
jm08 wrote: » I'm sure the relatives of the 80+ republican prisoners executed by the Free State Government didn't deserve the horrors inflicted by Collins, Eoin Duffy & Co. How do you share up what Michael Collins did on the eve of Bloody Sunday Blanch?
blanch152 wrote: » Start a thread about them in the History Forum, and put your theories out there, claiming they are equally as bad as Adams and Storey. Because that is the first important difference, the legacy of Adams and Storey is a living legacy suffered every day by good people on this island who didn't deserve the horrors inflicted on them by those two creeps.
blanch152 wrote: » Nothing selective about the nausea. Storey was a criminal thug, Adams covered up for pedophiles.
FrancieBrady wrote: » No defence of Adams in my post. There are questions about selective nausea though.
ineedeuro wrote: » Sure Adams is Sinn Fein, have to defend him over everything don't we?
FrancieBrady wrote: » I'm sure that was your view before Adams tweered If I was that nauseated I simply wouldn't be reading their tweets or looking at them venerating people who killed in war/conflicts. If it genuinely upsets you that is. You seem to be selecting what to get nauseous about though as you have no discernible issue with selected others venerating. .
blanch152 wrote: » Now I will need to see a doctor for the nausea having read that post. There is nothing redeeming about Storey or Adams, two psychopathic creeps.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Surely somebody so high up on the moral ground would have expressed nausea about the veneration of Collins and DeValera and condemned those who pose in front of pictures etc. One might accuse you of 'selective nausea' if you haven't done that.
blanch152 wrote: » https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/bobby-storey-is-an-inspiration-says-former-sf-president-40565981.html Nauseating stuff. One creep talking about another creep. "Leo Varadkar might have Michael Collins and Micheal Martin may have Eamon de Valera — we have Bobby Storey and he’s done more for Irish freedom, peace and unity on this island than either Leo Varadkar or Micheal Martin,” said Mr Adams." It would turn anyone's stomach to read that.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » I outlined a comparison,Francie, a comparison to an SF person. Now housing is a totally different kettle of pïss. I think you will find I have never gotten involved in any debates to any serious thread or extent on that subject. Now I know you have plenty of time to dredge through posts and you surely will, just to try to score an innocuous point . I wish you the best of luck. But don’t wreck the thread just to get a slap at the auld Brenner. That’s all I ask.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So you introduced Ruth to the conversation as another poster introduced climate change. Yet no ire for that poster, just a bitchy, 'I don't want to talk about this anymore' response when the conversation turned on FG. Predictable posting strategy's eh?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Francie, at the same auld rubbish again I never said Coppinger was SF.. Francie, you once again in an effort to ‘score pathetic points’ have interpreted post wrongly.You inferred from the post that that’s what I meant It’s very annoying to the genuine poster to have to deal with that kind of a posting strategy, very annoying indeed But I suppose that’s inbuilt into a certain coterie of folk.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So why no vitriol for the poster who introduced 'climate change' or is it maybe that you don't want to compare and contrast motivations for getting into politics? *Ruth Coppinger isn't in SF, either last time I looked, didn't you notice that when you 'checked thread subject'? This poster thinks you maybe don't want the conversation to go the way it is. Shot yourself in the old foot as they say.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Scrolls up to top…… Checks thread subject…… Notes it’s a Sinn Féin thread……. Plenty of ‘housing’ threads…… Suggests use one of those to find out the answer…….
Brendan Bendar wrote: » No,thats Lynn Boylan trying every which way to back into yet another high paid job funded by the taxpayer. Like Coppinger, when the electorate see through you, hop back to the teaching job and wait for the next ‘opportunity’. Different strokes Francie, different outlooks.
