grassroot1 wrote: » The amount of lads that have got kicked by suckler cows must be very high well on this threat anyway
Finty Lemon wrote: » Most suckler bred cattle are scrap despite the perception of good beef genetics. Bred from bad stock bulls, badly fed cows with no milk, born too late, fed shyte silage as weanlings, non existent grass management in year 2. The fact that ICSA were calling for upward movement on 30 month limits says it all about the suckler sector.
Hard Knocks wrote: » A few minutes every day is all it needs
Cavanjack wrote: » Buy in nearly all continental cattle here and rarely have a problem with wild ones. If they are wild it’s straight into the shed for fattening. 2 altogether since September and one of them was a quiet enough stag but didn’t want to chance him out to grass with the rest of the bullocks this year. Walk through them twice a day when they arrive or when they go to grass in the spring. Use paddocks here so find that helps. Have a good few bulls and struggle to get them up some of these mornings they are that settled. Walked through a field of friesian heifers a few weeks ago and thought I wouldn’t get out of the field. Pets!
Albert Johnson wrote: » I never thought I'd say it but if there too quiet it can be problematic and almost dangerous at times. I was doing a bit of fencing for a fella lately and he had a mix of CHx and HEx bullocks in the field. The CHx were bought as weanlings last autumn and the HEX were bought and reared as sucks in spring 2020 (lockdown project for the kids). The CHx are far from wild but maintained a respectful distance and went about grazing while we were working. The HEX are pets and a pure nuisance as they are stuck in everything, one of them ate the cardboard box the staples come in and another chewed the handle of a hammer I left down for a minute. There continually looking to be scratched and will walk in on top of you or butt you with there heads if being ignored, tbh I'd be wary of letting children near them because it's one thing when there a suck calf but another when there touching 500kg.
cute geoge wrote: » Not been smart ,but suckling is dying slowly .The future for beefi n this country is raising dairy x beef bred .AA comand the premium price in the factory that is what lidl/aldi want anyway.Would not be better off chancing a few beefxdairy bred suck calves .At the moment you could pick them up handy and they are easier handle then sucklers and it would suprise me if they would not leave you with more profit
K.G. wrote: » Our fr heifers are absolutely belting the living daylight s out of us at the moment.they just being friendly rubbing off youbut you d want to be careful with them
Base price wrote: » The same goes with all our FR/HEx/AAx and continental calves that we reared even though I said I wouldn't buy in calves to rear this year. Hand reared calves are different and can't be classed in the same bracket as suckler reared calves. IMO teat/bucket reared bulls (especially dairy breeds) are the most dangerous when the reach sexual maturity from 16months/2yo as they have no fear of humans. I've had a few aggressive suckler cows over the years but for only a few days after calving and they would settle back to normal. The most aggressive animal that I ever came across was a nine year old Friesian cull cow that we bought in. She was a fookin bitch and would charge across the field as soon as she saw you. She lasted less than two weeks before she got her non return ticket.
Albert Johnson wrote: » You'd wonder how the cow came to make it to be nine year's old if she was that aggressive? I'm not doubting your story as you'd have as much experience with stock as anyone but surely she wasn't that bad for her previous owner to have kept her that long. Sometimes an animal that's a real pet for one person can be downright dangerous in strange situations for different people. An elderly local man landed to the mart with a cull cow of his own one evening. He wouldn't be in great form and had an older Merc lorry with a heavy timber ramp and loading gate's. I dropped the ramp and let off the cow who looked to be visibly agitated. Sure enough she ran down off the lorry and I just got the pen gate closed when she charged, I'd be well used of wild stock but this cow would do serious harm to you if she could at the time. By then her owner was out of the lorry and couldn't believe how aggressive the cow was, he'd only have a small herd in a tie up byre and said that he could do anything with the cow at home. The cow was pacing around the pen, pawing the ground and looking for an escape. Her owner walked over and started scratching her through the bars and talking to her. Being honest I thought she'd break his arm but she actually settled enough to get her up the chute. It's amazing that they know who's good to them, if anyone else had went near her she'd have gave it to them but she calmed down for him.
Easten wrote: » I have found the costs involved in the Suckler beef system have kept on rising and yet the prices for the cattle after do not match. Looking back over the life of one of the cows I culled this year She had 9 calves. Her 1st calf a bull made 720, her last calf sold a few weeks back another bull made 810. 90 euros price increase in 9 years. Every other commodity has doubled in price in the last year. Looking back on what I used to pay a few years back Vet call out fees gone from 40 to 100 Weanlen Crunch gone from 5.50 to 8.50 / bag Silage 9.50/bale to 13.5 Mart fees 5/head to 10 CAN 195 to 240 Farm Insurance 375 to 705 I could list many more but the main point is the beef price has not risen in line with these. Lads telling me cattle are very dear now at the moment. Jezz I'd hate to see what they think low prices are. I run what I think is a fairly average farm, 27 Sucklers selling the Weanlens from 9 -12 months Yes the ad Weanlen makes 1100 in the ring, but I also have the ad small heifer only making 700. Doing the homework on the numbers I'm coming out with about 3.5k profit without paying myself a cent, add on the EU monies and I'm up to 10k. Feck knows what would happen if I ever went down with tb, the feed bills would be the end of it. 10k works out at less than 200 bucks a week. 200 bucks for a farming system where all you are basically doing is running to stand still. Suckler beef is at the stage now where you would be better off keeping next to no animals and just collect the EU money
Deleted User wrote: » I dont see why more farmers exiting breeding beef cattle don't go in to agreements with neighbouring dairy farmers to buy there calves on farm and avoid mart fees etc. Other options could be contract rearing of heifers etc. It would avoid all the trips to the mart for part time operators. If staying in sucklers then its key in my opinion to have an easy calving bull, use clover, have a tight calving window, try to shorten winter costs. Suckler bred bullocks should be well over 400 kg at the factory at 26 months or something is up. If going down the dairy stock route then id buy plain fresans bullocks or hereford heifers and only have them in for December through to mid Feb if possible.
Finty Lemon wrote: » I think you miss the point that going to the mart is a big part of the attraction for some lads. Nothing beats selling a pen of shapy red weanling bulls for big money, irrespective of the costs behind them. Friesians and black whiteheads just don't have that buzz. I know one man who walked away from a relatively profitable contact rearing enterprise because he missed the mart too much. He made money from the heifers off the dairy man but it burned a hole in his pocket so he had to back to the ring. An addict :rolleyes:
Dinzee Conlee wrote: » Ah, but Finty, what are we all here but addicts. Why would anyone chose to work in a minimum wage, dangerous job when there are better jobs to be had, except they are addicted... Just cos you might have a classier drug like black and whites that leave you slightly more money - doesn't mean you're not an addict either
_Brian wrote: » Minority of the discussion is if lads are making an insignificant amount or small profit, but, for the majority in suckling in particular the discussion is around how much they are loosing in reality. 60-70% at last I saw were at best break even.
Finty Lemon wrote: » Curious about the notion that things used to be better for suckling farms, I went looking for old figures on suckling margins this evening. The 2001 figures on average were as follows: Gross output was €705 per hectare before premia. Variable costs €465 leaving a gross margin of €240 Fixed costs were €435 per hectare leaving a dead loss of €195 per hectare So in 2001 a standard 25 hectare farm was losing €4875 annually from suckling Nothing has changed in almost a quarter century. It doesn't make money, it never did, it never will.
MIKEKC wrote: » I see that Derek Dean is pushing his campaign for a coupled payment for suckler cows. According to DAFM he is getting over e55,000 in payments. He is already getting a coupled payment from the reference period and now wants another which will of course mean another cut in everyone's payment. He certainly produces good stock so I presume these leave a profit. (If not he should change his system). One wonders what the man expects given the overall budget is being cut. There are thousands of farmers making do with a lot less
Finty Lemon wrote: » Can anyone justify the proposal for a coupled suckler cow payment in 2021?
Bass Reeves wrote: » There is a cohort out there that think the Suckler cow is the most important production vehicle since the sliced pan arrived. Most are divorced from economic reality. For many of them they see it as a way of reducing the effect of convergence which is coming down the track like a runaway train. While some consider the failure of EU Parliament, Comission and Council of Ministers to reach an agreement as a victory for those against convergence it is far from it. Most momentum is for convergence, front loading and payment capping. The general thrust now is for capping in Ireland to be below 100k and maybe in the 60-80k range. The argument against convergence is flawed as well with front loading likely to help balance to any smaller farm units. It interesting that Flor McCarthy had harsh words about the upward only convergence that IFA was selling as the answer to convergence which we all knew was BS but the agri media never challenged them.on it. Now we have an attempt to trap farmers with coupled payments that will encourage lads to hold onto or to re-enter suckling and encourage overproduction to benefit processor's. It just show the lack of commercial reality by these lads and the unquestioning attitude of a lot of the agri media
Grueller wrote: » No. Complete folly and I have 40+ sucklers here alongside a small dairy herd. I will be letting them off next spring/summer and rearing on the cattle from the dairy herd.
grassroot1 wrote: » With respect you would say that, if you are leaving suckler production and moving into dairy/dairy beef I cannot see west Cavan and Leitrim becoming a hot bed of calf to beef units. Historical payments are wrong as are payments for owning land whether producing or not so we are back I guess trying to define an "active" farmer
grassroot1 wrote: » Capping wont work those with the bigger entitlements will just split the holding and form companies some already have.
Deleted User wrote: » I dont see why more farmers exiting breeding beef cattle don't go in to agreements with neighbouring dairy farmers to buy there calves on farm and avoid mart fees etc. .