TheAnalyst_ wrote: » Why would I lie ?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Because you're an Analist
notAMember wrote: » Apologies for the unsolicited feedback, but your pension contributions are quite low. If you can afford it, bump up those AVCs.
tails_naf wrote: » Pensions are a pure scam, if you've money invest it independently, and skip the AVCs. Sure you get a bit of a tax break, but the returns are abysmal even when the general market returns are decent.
fvp4 wrote: » What’s that to you though? In general if there is a reason for the meeting to be held there they can expense some but not all of the trip. Not the entry to the F1, unless that was for a client.
HillCloudHop wrote: » What good is a pension when you'll either be too old or dead to enjoy it?
Deeper Blue wrote: » Most of them aren't real so I wouldn't worry
6 wrote: » You're doing pensions wrong then. Awful advice and I'd urge everyone to not listen to it tbh. In fact, it's probably the worst piece of financial advice I've read on here.
Geuze wrote: » My father retired at 62/63. His pensions provide him with income, and will do so for hopefully at least 25 years.
tails_naf wrote: » Thats the problem, the folks (pension providers in Ireland) who do them are doing them wrong. They get paid the same % from my pension pot no mater if the fund has a good or bad return. In most cases the 'management' they are doing is buying a vanguard fund anyway, so they are just middlemen taking a cut. When the NASDAQ outperorms a 'growth' fund significantly, its clear these are a scam. You can bet folks with real money are not using it for AVCs, but are getting it properly invested. As it happens I do pay into a pension fund, but only as my employer matches employee contributions, so that's a good return despite the funds poor performances on average.
Buddy Bubs wrote: » My pension fund turns 300 euro into 500 euro automatically every month. Then it gets invested. Try beat that
tails_naf wrote: » Sure, but if it's astandard/ private pension (i.e. Not defined benefit) I'd bet in real terms that income is a small portion of his final salary, despite pretty large contributions over the years. I put in over 18k last year (employer and employee), yet my projected return per annum is pitiful, less tha 20k in today's money. So contribute for 40 years and get paid back less, for 25 (if you live that long). Nice.
Creamy Goodness wrote: » Whatever people thinking people are telling lies here, saying that pensions are a waste of time is perhaps the biggest lie of the thread so far.
Buddy Bubs wrote: » For someone that thinks pensions are a waste of time, putting 18k into it in a year seems a strange thing to do. Or a lie.
tails_naf wrote: » My employer matches my contrib plus 2 % up to 8%, I put in 8%, they put in 10%. The maths is easy to work out. No. Lies, but if it was not for that contribution match making it a good deal, the return would be poor.
Buddy Bubs wrote: » Well there's mine. See pic attached. 54% growth over the last 5 years. Plus the tax relief I get. Plus my employers contribution. I know I pay charges on that but it's still very significant returns.
reubenreuben wrote: » While I see the benefit of pensions having one myself, the other side of this argument is that it is only any good if you survive to use it.
tails_naf wrote: » And the NASDAQ has grown 198% over the same time. Still think it's an amazing investment?