Fann Linn wrote: » All politics is triumphalism. Why are you here shouting down the Shinners otherwise whilst defending staunchly your FG party regardless of all its scandals.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Did you think Boris would have brought in a Sea border after what was said and what happened? If the British think it is expedient it will happen. If it doesn't then it is just more win win for nationalists. Stop and think of the absolute bind the Unionists have gotten themselves into here.
blanch152 wrote: » Ah yes, the ultimate prize is getting one-up on them-ums. And so the NI merry-go-round continues. Both sides as bad as each other.
Furze99 wrote: » Well Francie, I don't claim to understand Unionists entirely but clearly I know a damn sight more about them than you! And since you're continuously spinning your opinions on such matters, you'd kinda think that you'd have gathered a better insight by now or what will fly and what won't fly with our unionist neighbours. Of course, looked at from a SF POV this is a good move, get one up on Poots and his buddies. Drive division and so on. But just lengthens the day to an agreed UI.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Was it you earlier who was suggesting there was no way Westminster could introduce the legislation? If so, can you explain that first? If not...feck off with the 'drive division' accusations. You look for equal rights because division already exists. Equal rights heal division. 2006 this was first agreed and has been blocked and blocked again....but the Shinners are 'driving division'. Jesus H.
blanch152 wrote: » What you and others haven't realised is that SF have run out of road on excuses now. They have always pointed to the DUP as "belligerents", but if once we get an Irish Languages Act, SF will have to stop its pretence of not owning what the Executive does.
drdidlittle wrote: » When will the people on the street start to see the benifit from this 15 year hard fought struggle?
blanch152 wrote: » That shows how much you know. And it's very little.
FrancieBrady wrote: » They are watching a political party mired in sectarian religiously bigoted policy and rump of the former sectarian state implode in front of their eyes.
drdidlittle wrote: » The whole issue of NI summed up in less than 25 words.
CDarby wrote: » Your not a fine gael man? Seriously like, your posts seriously misrepresent yourself. Maybe time to think about a nice signature or a tagline clarifying that, surely that poster above is not the first to misunderstand you lol.
blanch152 wrote: » Eh, nope. Not aligned to any party, voted Green in the last two elections. The climate issue is the biggest one facing the country. Deep hatred of Sinn Fein and the support of violence that they stand for.
guy2231 wrote: » The climate issue is the biggest issue facing the country, give it a rest would you blanch.
Bishop of hope wrote: » He is right to an extent. Its the one of biggest causes of spiralling costs of housing anyways.
FrancieBrady wrote: » No, that's greed.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » No,thats Lynn Boylan trying every which way to back into yet another high paid job funded by the taxpayer. Like Coppinger, when the electorate see through you, hop back to the teaching job and wait for the next ‘opportunity’. Different strokes Francie, different outlooks.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Scrolls up to top…… Checks thread subject…… Notes it’s a Sinn Féin thread……. Plenty of ‘housing’ threads…… Suggests use one of those to find out the answer…….
FrancieBrady wrote: » So why no vitriol for the poster who introduced 'climate change' or is it maybe that you don't want to compare and contrast motivations for getting into politics? *Ruth Coppinger isn't in SF, either last time I looked, didn't you notice that when you 'checked thread subject'? This poster thinks you maybe don't want the conversation to go the way it is. Shot yourself in the old foot as they say.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Francie, at the same auld rubbish again I never said Coppinger was SF.. Francie, you once again in an effort to ‘score pathetic points’ have interpreted post wrongly.You inferred from the post that that’s what I meant It’s very annoying to the genuine poster to have to deal with that kind of a posting strategy, very annoying indeed But I suppose that’s inbuilt into a certain coterie of folk.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So you introduced Ruth to the conversation as another poster introduced climate change. Yet no ire for that poster, just a bitchy, 'I don't want to talk about this anymore' response when the conversation turned on FG. Predictable posting strategy's eh?
