DrPhilG wrote: » Well in my utter despair at the bumbling stupidity of my local VW dealer cocking up my purchase, I went looking to see if there were any alternatives I could go for in order to tell them to shove their car up their ass. And there really aren't many options that compare. Model 3 still too expensive and lower range, plus no PCP option. Kia more expensive due to the higher finance cost, lower range, and just a bit bland compared to the ID3. Enyaq seems a lot more expensive for the 80kWh model, and a fair bit further from production. Gutted to be honest. Haven't bought a new car in over 20 years and was so looking forward to collecting the ID3 next month. Now I almost feel like flushing the whole idea and keeping the i3.
DrPhilG wrote: » Well in my utter despair at the bumbling stupidity of my local VW dealer cocking up my purchase,
KCross wrote: » Has the dealer confirmed that it’s too late to fix the order? Presumably the car hasn’t been built. Can they fix the paperwork and get the right car made?
DrPhilG wrote: » Pain in the arse that the Model 3 LR is so expensive, and don't offer PCP.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » I've done a few motorway trips over the last few weeks, and my consumption @ 120km/h has been in or around 160Wh/km (16kWh/100km).
unkel wrote: » The only other EV that can do that is the Hyundai Ioniq Aerodynamics + efficient drivetrain can make up a lot for a relatively small battery...
unkel wrote: » You really need the range of the LR? The Model 3 is far more efficient than th EVs you have owned so far at motorway speeds. Have you driven one yet? PCP is not the only way of cheap finance.
slave1 wrote: » Missus had an Athlone to Mourne Mountains 492 motorway return trip last week (Newry to hike not motorway), the trip readings were 14.7 on the Kona
Black_Knight wrote: » What did they do this time? You could do with your own thread at this rate Phil. Edit: think it was silent running I was thinking if. Didn't he have to return his id3?
DrPhilG wrote: » EV Database reckons as low as 250km in winter and I generally do a lot worse than their scores.
unkel wrote: » Not at 120km/h GPS speed though You need Cd of max 0.24 or so for the above figures. Tesla claim the Model S plaid is just 0.208 now. I find it hard to believe they've managed to improve it that much from the original which had 0.24, but we'll see. Model 3 and Ioniq also have 0.24 afaik
AndyBoBandy wrote: » but was that consumption at 120km/h? my figure above has been my consumption at 120 lately. We did a ~600km trip last week to Limerick, North Kerry, Cliff's of Moher, Limerick, Dublin, and the average on the whole trip was about 145Wh/km
Time-of-Use tariffs are a new way for homes with Smart Meters to pay for electricity. You pay different rates at different times of the day. By shifting when you use electricity, from more expensive to cheaper times, you can help the environment, because it will allow more electricity to come from renewable sources. This helps to lower your bill too.
MJohnston wrote: » Oh hello there — just got an email introducing their new "Time of Use" plans for customers with Smart Meters: Looks like it won't just be day and night tariffs, but Day, Night, and Peak. It looks like they're calling this "Home Connect": https://www.energia.ie/plans-and-switching-info/all-energy-plans
ELM327 wrote: » Hard no. I will defend my day/night meter to the death
slave1 wrote: » That's the exact reason for the "Smart meters", reef us out of it from 5pm-7pm
the_amazing_raisin wrote: » Of course if it actually followed the market rate then there would be some cheaper times. Instead they basically made a more expensive time and didn't create a cheaper one to offset it