Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » I see Philip Ryan has another article looking in to the SF toolkit, looking at their Media playbook. Lots of very angry shinners hopping up and down that he's reporting on them again. Weird reaction, especially as no one else really cares all that much. Think SF just have an omerta thing going on so when internal secrets are exposed they don't take it very well at all.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » I see Philip Ryan has another article looking in to the SF toolkit, looking at their Media playbook. Lots of very angry shinners hopping up and down that he's reporting on them again.
jammiedodgers wrote: » https://twitter.com/Philip_Ryan/status/1404365819044323328 Those monsters, returning phone calls in a timely fashion. Is there no end to their sinister shenanigans Paddy?
ineedeuro wrote: » Bit pointless sharing that document, I would expect all parties have similar.
Fann Linn wrote: » You're right. Ryan thinking he has an exclusive when in actual fact he has sweet fa. I was involved with a communications unit in a trade union and we had similar guides with how to interact with print or radio media. He's begining to come across now as one of Harris'/Barbara Pyms acolytes the way he's rushing to print with anything that has a SF logo.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » I mean this in all genuine honesty and I'm 100% not being flippant about the past, but to give you an analogy, if you're currently starving and somebody who before you were born had a family feud with your father offers you food at a decent price and on friendly terms, the fact that your parents didn't get on with him isn't going to matter sh!t to you. That's fundamentally what's happening here. It's hard to say without sounding flippant but to be absolutely blunt, things have disintegrated so much since the early 2010s for many young people that they would vote for Daniel Kinahan or Ted Bundy if their stated policy objective was "remove housing administration from the hands of for-profit companies and rebuild the public service element of housing provision which Ireland maintained from 1930 to 1990".
Hamsterchops wrote: » Looks like the old Shinners are going to hold the NI Assembly to Ransome again over the nomination of the new 1st Minister & deputy, unless they get their Irish language act first :cool: Oh dear Lord, that is so unfair on the people of NI who will probably be in limbo for another three years or more? Until SF get their way.
Fann Linn wrote: » The language act was agreed on prior to Arlene stepping down. Poots could of course say let it through, he probably won't to play to his loyalist base, however the lads on here seem to think it's SF fault.
ineedeuro wrote: » I think we can all agree according to a few people on here nothing is ever Sinn Fein fault. Correct?
Hamsterchops wrote: » SF are using the language act as a weapon. So unfair.
Hamsterchops wrote: » SF are using the language act as a weapon. So unfair. I mean, I could understand if even half the NI population spoke & conversed in Irish, but they don't, so SF are just going to make a point by taking down the Assembly (again) until hey get their way!
FrancieBrady wrote: » The usual crew queuing up to make it SF's fault for looking for something agreed in 2002 to be implemented.
StupidLikeAFox wrote: » Its entirely Sinn Feins fault for trying to crowbar it into an unrelated nomination for first minister. I mean its clever politically, but let's face it, they are only shoehorning it in to put pressure on their opponent
FrancieBrady wrote: » When the DUP were cheerleading Brexit and May and Boris I must have missed your posts worrying about de people
Fann Linn wrote: » Do you agree that something which was legislated for should be discarded at the whim of one party?
Hamsterchops wrote: » Missed my posts, yes maybe you should have gone to Specsavers. I've blasted Brexit and its supporters many times, big mistake Brexit. Flawed in so many ways.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So show me a post where you worried about the people of NI when the DUP were promoting Brexit.