Dave_The_Sheep wrote: » Runt?
Zzippy wrote: » Semantics. The pro-am is not a competition, it's a sponsor's day associated with the tournament. It's an integral part of the tournament and is supposedly a contractual obligation, otherwise players would skip playing with wealthy bankers and get more time on the range. He is playing the actual competition but chose to skip part of his contracted duties. No reaction. Osaka wanted to skip media duties and was told she wasn't allowed. So she pulled out, and received a torrent of abuse even though she specified she had mental health issues.
Former Former Former wrote: » But the more likely explanation is no one gives a shyte about a Pro-Am.
OldRio wrote: » Apart from the sponsors and organisers and rich people. You know, the people that really really matter.
Former Former Former wrote: » That's the exactly the point though. Some stockbroker didn't get the chance to shoot 9 holes with Rory McIlroy and Jimmy Fallon, and people are questioning why there wasn't the same level of attention as the world number 2 pulling out of a major?!
errlloyd wrote: » Osaka wasn't asking to never do it again, she just wanted a break.
Podge_irl wrote: » Also several comments from other players were clear that they consider the press part of the job and being able to skip it a completive advantage.
errlloyd wrote: » Lol. This is tennis, a sport where people often choose to compete in both Doubles and Singles at the same tournament.
Neil3030 wrote: » Gotta hold my hand up here on one thing. There I was, thinking to myself, "I wonder if Piers Morgan used terms similar to "petulant little madam" to describe Alex Ferguson, when he refused to talk to the BBC for most of the naughties...." However, turns out, he pretty much did: "He's petty to the point of puerility; witness the pathetic on-going ban he has imposed on the entire BBC, after Panorama investigated his son..." So I think we can all agree... he's still a complete <word removed to stay in line with charter... rhymes with... bunt>.
dregin wrote: » Poor fastly SRE. Pretty amazing to see how many major websites have them as a single point of failure with what looks like no failover option. Github, I'm looking at you.
Squidgy Black wrote: » You'd think they'd all have learnt from the last cloudflare outage but apparently not.
irishbucsfan wrote: » To be fair, a redundant CDN isn’t that trivial. It may not be worth the cost or you may have a plan that isn’t feasible to enact quicker than it took Fastly to put that fix in place.
Deleted User wrote: » Always enjoy a good marvel movie, thought Wandavision and Falcon and the Winter Soldier were average enough but Loki seems very promising, quite liked the first episode.
Dave_The_Sheep wrote: » Genuinely horrible to watch.
Larbre34 wrote: » I think to give the TV people the benefit of the doubt, as soon as it became evident that the medical intervention was very serious, they pulled back the cameras to far distant. They weren't expecting it like any of us.