jm08 wrote: » How were they lying? They were not doing anything that a commercial polling company wouldn't have been doing. Leo says that he employed professionals to do it for him, but he is not sure what others might have done.
jm08 wrote: » Surely the constituencies were doing that? Buying offices which they probably got for half nothing. Better the rental fee go into the back pocket of the party rather than in the property portfolio of the landlord classes of FFG TDs/councillors.
piplip87 wrote: » https://twitter.com/Philip_Ryan/status/1402520831650054145?s=19 They where told to tell people they where working with an INDEPENDENT COMPANY. This is wrong, this unethical. Again SF trying to justify lying to the electorate.
jm08 wrote: » Did they have all that money back in 2015? They were a small party in number and they were yet to be left the money (probably still don't have it). Anyway, as far as I can recall, that money is to be spent on education and looking after former IRA prisoners and their families who may be suffering hard times. I don't think they could use it for something like polling.
As a rule of thumb, if Philip turns comments off you can guarantee his SF scoop affects other parties.
For Forks Sake wrote: » If someone shows up to my door and says they're from Amárach, or Behaviour&Attitudes, or RedC, or MRBI and have credentials to back that up, then I'll engage with them. When someone shows up from a company that literally doesn't exist....
You are invited to participate in this survey about financial providers and banks in Ireland
jm08 wrote: » I got a request this morning from a company called Opinions Market Research which I have never heard of: This is all the information I got (along with how long it would take to do it and that it was in the strictest confidence). Would you answer that survey?
Shebean wrote: » Don't all political parties pay private companies for door to door surveys?
For Forks Sake wrote: » Well, they exist as a business, so that puts them at least one rung above the Shinners non-existant one.https://www.solocheck.ie/Irish-Business/Opinions-Market-Research-647141
jm08 wrote: » They do. And the companies doing the surveys don't say who they are doing them for.
FrancieBrady wrote: » :D I did wonder why he turned comments off and a negative SF story is unusually behind a paywall on the Indo. Having heard FG's statement on the News At One(apparently Labour have said they done this too) I would say this isn't far off the mark.https://twitter.com/PieceOfPi552/status/1402620494214467587
jm08 wrote: » So would you answer the survey?
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » I for one totally believe Lisa, I also believe Gerry was never in the IRA. Amusing to include ABU in the handle. The botness is strong in this one.
Fann Linn wrote: » Judging by the silence on this by Neil Richmond and others on Twitter today I'd say Ryan's story this morning is a non runner, or else they're all it.
skimpydoo wrote: » Funny you should mention they are all at it. What do the FFG supporters on here say now.https://twitter.com/Philip_Ryan/status/1402663572535136262?s=20
I see sheep wrote: » Simon Harris - "it's sinister" Half an hour later Varadkar says FG did it til 2017. These idiots are running the country ffs.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Pretty sure he said they have sent people out to ask questions. He didn't say they had fake ID badges and said they were from a made up organisation. Wouldn't blow my load just yet if I were you.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » I see Boylan is renting out a pad in Killiney. What is going on here, O’Broin sending out fake polling ‘activists’ !!! Lot of slates being lifted here…… Boylan and O’Broin and some brace of charlatans and chancers. Time to drain the swamp.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Need an enquiry into the tactics of SF…… Gardai apparently interested in their activities.
I see sheep wrote: » LOL Jesus the FFG apostles blow their load at any hint of a story that might stop SF march towards being the biggest party. Sorry to tell you but this attempt has fallen flat. Even if this was just SF (and it's clear now it was all of them so why are so still going on about it?), does taking a poll with a fake id compare with destroying the country, forcing hurdreds of thousands to emigrate and causing thousands of deaths by suicide? Hmm.. it's a tough call alright.
skimpydoo wrote: » Well, how do you pose as a fake pollster without fake id?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Bit of an overkill there dude, you would do better to tone down your hyperbole a little bit to be even remotely plausible. If you think that post is plausible …..well ‘ challenged’ is the word which comes to mind.
guy2231 wrote: » The guy clearly reads too much of the indo