Faugheen wrote: » What does your point have to do with anything I have said, then? You've spoken about skin colour not being the issue, when I was responding to a post where the poster made an assumption about someone based on their skin colour. Now you're trying to move away from that clearly and throw something at me that I never referenced. Distract, deflect, deny, dismiss. Go away.
Faugheen wrote: » What would you call that? Should we assume all black people are foreigners, then? .
TomTomTim wrote: » You've a great habit of putting words in peoples mouths, something the honest don't need to do. I think you know though, deep down, that we'd deport every native Irish scumbag too if we could. It's suit you to ignore this though, so you can keep banging your "racism" drum.
Cordell wrote: » Why don't you ask the poster of the video then? I made a different point in the post you quoted - do you have a problem with that as well, or do you agree with me?
Faugheen wrote: » They’re black you see, therefore they’re dirty foreigners and not ‘real’ Irish. Funny those just shouting deport all of them and ‘house our own first’ seem to forget that Irish people were the ones in these positions not so very long ago.
Deleted User wrote: » Ireland is still a predominately white nation, and the arrival of Black people into Ireland is still a relatively new change. It's perfectly reasonable to make the association between Black people and being foreign. They could be Irish born. That's true.. second generation. Unlikely to be third generation. They could, just as easily, not be Irish though.When? Were Irish people given financial and social supports? I can't recall any period in modern history (not so long ago) when Irish people were supported in such a manner.. nor received such a welcome from any government.
Faugheen wrote: » Funny those just shouting deport all of them and ‘house our own first’ seem to forget that Irish people were the ones in these positions not so very long ago.
Faugheen wrote: » They’re black you see, therefore they’re dirty foreigners and not ‘real’ Irish.
Funny those just shouting deport all of them and ‘house our own first’ seem to forget that Irish people were the ones in these positions not so very long ago.
Faugheen wrote: » Actually the poster put up a video of black people fighting and immediately said they should be deported even though there is every chance they are Irish. And you’re here telling me it had nothing to do with their skin colour? What is the basis for assuming they were immigrants then if it isn’t their skin colour? This should be very interesting to see how you talk your way around this one.
Cordell wrote: » Their skin colour is not the issue. The fact that such a small minority manages to get themselves into the news so often and almost never for good reasons, is.
MarkEadie wrote: » Yeah it seems very strange to argue for deporting citizens born and bred here which may be the case for the lads in the video above.
Cordell wrote: » Well, you'd better get used to it
Cordell wrote: » Nothing to see here, I don't get the point. It's not like they're the only type of immigrants having gang fights in broad daylight in the city centre. I think polish people outnumber them 10:1 or more, so I'm sure there were tens of polish gang fights that went unreported.
MarkEadie wrote: » Correct. A lot of the posts from the anti immigration side are just not worthy of response I feel, which is a shame. Its a little bit like reviewing a product. The majority of people who review are usually the ones who complain. You can't really get a reasonable discussion going with people who want to set up their own parties against immigration as I've seen in a couple of posts. Then there were the emails to the TDs
Bobblehats wrote: » Dublin or Little London? G’wan de multiculturlism. Gaggle of local geese snapping up the ringside seats..
bubblypop wrote: » Even though this particular thread appears to be far more of an anti asylum seeker thread than anything else.
Burkie1203 wrote: » Time to start deporting those who live here as a result of an application but behave like thishttps://twitter.com/dubslife1/status/1401881725727301638?s=19
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » A Leitrim every year, a Kildare every six....
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Its likely these are our own....
crooked cockney villain wrote: » The biggest housing scandal of the last 12 months, media wise, was the vulture fund buying up the housing estate in Maynooth. Personally I can't understand why the biggest housing scandal wasn't - the Kurdish lad in the country 10 minutes being given a 700K one bed flat in Terenure - the Nkencho family being moved from a, IMO, circa 280- 350K home in Clonee to a newer upwards of 400K home up the road (or where they- in a video where the family abused Gardai they appeared to live in Hollystown, but in a radio interview where a heckler told them to leave Clonee the sister claimed they still lived there- are they living between TWO homes?) Vulture funds are one thing, free gaffs for ingrates is another.
bubblypop wrote: » 200,000 over 6 years Approx 33K more per year entered the country, then left the country? It doesn't seem like a lot.
bubblypop wrote: » And that is the reason there is no robust defence. Because people don't feel the need to, it is accepted and most people don't have any issue with multiculturalism. So, no need therefore to defend it. The only people who feel so strongly are anti, so they need to point out what they see as negative points. If you are happy with something, it doesn't particularly raise any emotion either way, it just is. Even though this particular thread appears to be far more of an anti asylum seeker thread than anything else.