iffandonlyif wrote: » I’ve been pretty miffed by all the hysterical Mazepin hate, but this is probably the point I give up caring. What a crazy twitch.
recyclebin wrote: » Verstappen used to do that late twitch not so long ago! Not sure why the Haas needed to swap positions crossing the line anyway. It wasnt going to prove anything.
recyclebin wrote: » And Micks dad did a lot worse to Barrichello down the straight!
BrentMused wrote: » Really happy for Checo. An excellent driver who was always going to need time to settle into a new car and team, never mind in a season in which testing was dramatically reduced. Makes the discussions doing the rounds a few weeks ago about Red Bull potentially replacing him even more ridiculous than they were at the time. I have no doubt that come the end of the season, Red Bull will have been very pleased with his contribution. It will make a huge difference for them being able to try undercuts and different strategies by having their second driver being consistently in the top 3 or 4.
Faugheen wrote: » Well then maybe establish all the facts before you shoot your mouth off.
Faugheen wrote: » I don’t understand why Pirelli have questions to answer?
Faugheen wrote: » That’s actually fair enough.
Gaoth Laidir wrote: » So Hamilton flicked the Magic switch on the upshift at the start, which fecked up his brakes at turn 1. How did he manage to get around the rest of the race relatively freely if he didn't realise until after the race that he had flicked that switch? I assume this magic only affect the start and is not an issue when the brakes heat up normally during the race?
Lawlesz wrote: » I don't think we are getting the full story on the "magic" switch. Toto said it was something to do with changing the bias which I don't really buy. I think sky alluded to it being a switch to help get the brake temps within range on formation laps or SC periods. Hamilton brakes looked way hotter as they were lining up too. The fact that they called it a magic switch seemed a bit off, like they couldn't say straight out what it was. Maybe I'm just cynical... Whatever it waa, Bono said he turned it off but back on again, so that's a little crazy if it is that easy to move by accident
[Deleted User] wrote: » Good advice. Let's watch you follow it Couple of people correct you Oh. Just a pity you didn't establish all the facts before, ahem, shooting your mouth off.
Faugheen wrote: » I don’t understand why Pirelli have questions to answer? Why can’t teams monitor for themselves and see that a 2-stop might be necessary?
Hijpo wrote: » Also, not sure who it was in commentary may have been Di Resta but they were very coy in not divulging exactly that that button was for saying they would leave it up to the team to comment on it. If its jusy break bias would he be that coy? Not trying to concoct a conspiracy theory just wondering if he would be or why he would think he would be in a delicate position to give that info.
Hijpo wrote: » Also, not sure who it was in commentary may have been Di Resta but they were very coy in not divulging exactly that that button was for saying they would leave it up to the team to comment on it. If its jusy brake bias would he be that coy? Not trying to concoct a conspiracy theory just wondering if he would be or why he would think he would be in a delicate position to give that info.
Burkie1203 wrote: » Pirelli say tyres issues may be debris as they found a cut on Hamiltons left rear.
Top Dog wrote: » Except his didn't fail so what difference does it make?