The key elements include six high speed charging hubs on motorways capable of charging eight vehicles simultaneously; 16 high speed charging hubs capable of charging four vehicles simultaneously; additional high power chargers at 34 current 50 kW locations; upgrading over 50 22 kW chargers to 50 kW, and replacing up to 264 locations with 528 charge points at the pre-existing pilot grade of 22 kW to next generation high reliability models.
peposhi wrote: » Ready to part with 75% of your car lol
AndyBoBandy wrote: » Let’s not kid ourselves here…… we all know it’s going to be 4 CCS & 4 CHAdeMO……. I’d bet my car on it.
Black_Knight wrote: » April UpdateCCS/CHAdeMO split My stats say, over the last 2 weeks: CHAdeMO has been occupied 40.6% of the time. (7.41 weeks of use) CCS the other 59.4% of the time (10.86 weeks of use)Unit counts 131 Fast charge units installed (Up 6) 533 Slow charge AC units installed (down 10 - all are AC-DC replacements, some were 2 single socket AC units being replaced with DC) 268 of the newer 22kW AC units are now in place. 131 of the old units yet to be replaced, and 15 of those single socket AC units to be replaced too.AC updates to the new Evolve Smart T unit Dock Road, Dunmore East, Waterford Wolfe Tone Square, Tubbercurry, Sligo Public Car Park, Strand Road, Falcarragh, Donegal Public Car Park, Nailors Row, Buncrana, Donegal Main Street, Belmullet, Mayo Church Street, Wicklow Town, WicklowAC units upgraded to DC - 29 of the 50 delivered Bit of a vague number, this is 29 of those units installed, but they're being installed at the "hubs" too. Blackhall Car Park, Off Mount Street, Mullingar, Westmeath Marian Hall Car Park, Off William Street, Birr, Offaly Garda Station Car Park, Off Lymington Road, Enniscorthy, Wexford Barrack Lane, New Ross, Wexford Public Car Park, Vicar Street, Tuam, Galway Market Street, Carrickmacross, Monaghan Fire Brigade Car Park, New Road, Kinsale, Cork Dolphin's Place, Youghal, CorkNew FCP None
MJohnston wrote: » Aye, but what I meant was that even if we stick with DC chargers, you have rapid improvements in charge point tech, rapid improvements in battery tech, rapid improvements in onboard charger tech, etc.
the_amazing_raisin wrote: » You can do a bit both, for example even just putting down underground ducting and pedastals for chargers makes installation work down the line much easier Even if the future is battery swaps or mobile robotic chargers, it'll take a while for them to catch on and DC chargers will be around for a while since they'll be relatively cheaper than any new technologies
MJohnston wrote: » Yeah, putting the literal groundwork in makes sense, for sure. It’s a tough cookie though, there are so many concurrently rapidly advancing pieces of the technology puzzle and no slowdown in sight.
MJohnston wrote: » The problem imo is that future-proofed charging infrastructure, in terms of charging rate, is going to cost disproportionately more now than it will in 5 years or so.
McGiver wrote: » You're nitpicking terminology here... In 2021 FCP = 150+ kW DC. That's what I meant.
McGiver wrote: » Petrol stations/towns/suburbs - 50 kW DC is not the most suitable, hard do anything in 20-30 minutes (shopping), 22 kW DC would be more suitable. Btw any sort of DC isn't that widespread in this setting in the more developed EV markets. Unlikely we'll see a massive DC deployment in this setting in Ireland. Unless wireless charging becomes cheap and widespread.
liamog wrote: FCPs should never be put on motorways.
liamog wrote: The hierarchy is straightforward, 150kW+ for motorways and interurbans, 50kW for town and suburbs, 11kW AC for destination and overnight charging.
liamog wrote: The infra has to be built for the next 100,000 cars not the current fleet of slow DC charging vehicles.
cannco253 wrote: I wonder if they were ID.3 owners using up the free credits they got last year? What EVs were using Ionity out of curiosity?
Black_Knight wrote: » Ditto. "In the interest of balance" or some BS like that they'll keep it 50:50 rather than use the metrics they have to guide them.
Black_Knight wrote: » Certainly there no justification for 4 CHAdeMO plugs. 2 seems sufficient, especially if the existing triple head unit remains.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I'm not sure J14 is a great place to install a so called Hub ? there are already Ionity chargers not that far away, I really think these should have been placed much further west or south west. In my opinion, J23 would have been far better place to put them considering how appalling the infrastructure is that direction. What's this hub going to have 4 x 150 units which are already outdated or 2 x 50 and 2 x 150 ? load balancing ? the current 150 Kw share with ChADeMo which is ridiculous in this day and age.
innrain wrote: » Stopped @J14 to take some pictures. There is nothing visible to report except that there were 2 cars charging an ID4 and a Niro one on the Type2 and a third one waiting.
McGiver wrote: » Arrived in Athlone circle K at 12pm today, business day alright, so thought it would be empty. Free Circle K charger - 1 car charging, second waiting, I was the third. So I went Ionity, withing few minutes all 4 bays full, 1 car waiting! This is only pre warning of what will happen next. The infrastructure will collapse. Ionity will need to to double the number of bays. Ecars are totally bonkers they're building infrastructure for 2018 not for 2021 and ahead.... They should be putting 3 chargers on each site NOW.
McGiver wrote: » This is only pre warning of what will happen next. The infrastructure will collapse. Ionity will need to to double the number of bays. Ecars are totally bonkers they're building infrastructure for 2018 not for 2021 and ahead.... They should be putting 3 chargers on each site NOW.
charlieIRL wrote: » In all the times I've been out there, I rarely see a car charging at the ionity points. You do know there are 4 more >50kWh chargers in Athlone as well? 2 at N6 Centre (1 high speed), 1 at KFC and one beside the Town Centre shopping centre
markpb wrote: » Perhaps an acceptance that FCPs won't be considered "fast" for very long? 150s on motorways make the most sense to me. 50s make sense in towns where there are facilities like shopping and cafes so you can kill time waiting to charge. Then 22s in shopping centres and 7s in car parks and train stations.
slave1 wrote: » Nothing wrong with 50kW chargers along motorways, not looking for a full charge, just enough to get home and with modern EV ranges only a 10-15 minute stop at a 50 would be plenty. Herself had a 492km trip yesterday and just needed 18minutes at a 50 to give a nice buffer and got home with plenty to spare, a 5 minute stop would have got her home but after a coffee/loo break it just so happened to turn out to be 18minutes
liamog wrote: » FCPs should never be put on motorways. The hierarchy is straightforward, 150kW+ for motorways and interurbans, 50kW for town and suburbs, 11kW AC for destination and overnight charging. The infra has to be built for the next 100,000 cars not the current fleet of slow DC charging vehicles.
McGiver wrote: » All FCPs should be on the motorway. What ecars we thinking putting FCPs in towns....
charlieIRL wrote: You do know there are 4 more >50kWh chargers in Athlone as well? 2 at N6 Centre (1 high speed), 1 at KFC and one beside the Town Centre shopping centre