bubblypop wrote: » It's not hard at all, they did not target Muslim girls. They targeted young vulnerable, mostly British girls. At risk youngsters from, mostly dysfunctional backgrounds. Many of whom were or had been at some stage in care. Why did they target those girls? Because they were easy pickings for the gangs, they came from disadvantaged backgrounds, where they were, mostly, left to fend for themselves by parents that couldn't or wouldn't. Young girls that society really didn't care about, they were the ones targeted by gangs of Asian men, who also didn't care about them. As I said, there have been many reports into Rotherham and other cases, if you would like links, I can post a few.
bubblypop wrote: » of course there was a link with their backgrounds, I would suggest the culture and nationality of these men was the main thing. Now, there have always been grooming gangs and paedophiles in the world. I would suggest a high majority of paedophiles travel to Cambodia and neighbouring countries to partake in ritual child abuse. I don't know why, maybe it's easier far away, maybe it is that the child doesn't 'look like them ' Which could also be another reason the mainly Pakistani men targeted British girls, maybe they are less like their own children. I'm absolutely no expert on paedophiles or grooming gangs but I have lots of experience with victims. It's a horrendous crime, that can have devastating consequences on victims. Particularly when, like those girls in the UK, they were basically abandoned and ignored by society and those that should have helped.
bubblypop wrote: » It's not hard at all, they did not target Muslim girls. They targeted young vulnerable, mostly British girls.
MikeOxsgreen wrote: » It seems its very difficult to say "white girls*" were being raped and abused on industrial levels. British girls weren't targeted. White girls were.
Deleted User wrote: » To those who replied to my earlier posts, (Sand and others), I've been going through some personal issues, and have lost interest in long discussions on the thread. Read your posts, agree somewhat, figure there's a degree of semantics going on. In any case, I'll be relatively quiet on the thread for a while.
jmreire wrote: » In Islamic society, interaction between unrelated males and females once they reach puberty is forbidden by the Quran. In modern times, this law is obeyed differently in different Countrys. In some Country's it is just ignored,in others its reinforced to the extent that women are required to cover themselves up completely. Rape, is a serious crime in all Countrys regardless of religion. But especially in Islamic Countrys where Sharia Law is the primary Law, rapists can be executed. But that is only guarenteed if the women are Muslim. Raped Non Muslim women can have different outcome's. But one thing is for sure, you will never see or hear about Muslim rape gangs like in Bradford or Leeds in Muslim Countrys.
Sand wrote: » Well, that is because if a guy groomed/groped/raped a woman in another family in a Muslim country her father, brothers, uncles, ,male cousins etc would take it as an insult against their family and lynch the guy and his father/brothers/uncles/male cousins etc. Or they would die in the attempt. One of the most grim realisations from the grooming gang scandals is how English fathers/brothers and men generally have simply sat down and accepted the systematic grooming, humiliation, rape and abuse of their daughters and sisters. They simply weren't prepared for this onslaught. And the UK government and police have knowingly sat on their hands while it happened and continues to happen. The great myth of the modern ideology is that innocent and hardworking foreign enclaves need to be protected from hateful and violent indigenous peoples. The open borders mythology is if the English (or any indigenous European people) were to make rational decisions in their own interests then terrible evil happens. Media is full of that message - don't make policy in your own interests, don't be evil. If this great fear of an indigenous backlash were in any way true, surely the systematic rape of indigenous girls by foreign gangs would spark some sort of backlash. People can endure a lot but raping their children must invoke some sort of response. Right? But there has been nothing. Up until 10 years ago, the idea that foreign gangs were systematically targeting, abusing and raping indigenous girls would have been denounced as a racist conspiracy theory. What people like Bubblypop show us is that this was an unnecessary argument. English girls facing English social problems now have the added challenge of avoiding being groomed by men from foreign enclaves created by UK government policy. But this is simply accepted by open border advocates as the new normal. There is no questioning of how this came to be and certainly no acceptance that it could have been avoided by not permitting mass migration in the first place QUOTE] Yup. Thats what would happen. The whole Family / Clan would become involved in a case where one of their womenfolk was raped. The culprit (s) would be killed, if not under Sharia law, then by the family members. And thats why you will not see Muslim gangs targetting Muslim women, they are well aware of the consequences. They are not under the same constraints when it comes to non-muslim women though. They dont count.
Sand wrote: » Well, that is because if a guy groomed/groped/raped a woman in another family in a Muslim country her father, brothers, uncles, ,male cousins etc would take it as an insult against their family and lynch the guy and his father/brothers/uncles/male cousins etc. Or they would die in the attempt.One of the most grim realisations from the grooming gang scandals is how English fathers/brothers and men generally have simply sat down and accepted the systematic grooming, humiliation, rape and abuse of their daughters and sisters. They simply weren't prepared for this onslaught. And the UK government and police have knowingly sat on their hands while it happened and continues to happen. The great myth of the modern ideology is that innocent and hardworking foreign enclaves need to be protected from hateful and violent indigenous peoples. The open borders mythology is if the English (or any indigenous European people) were to make rational decisions in their own interests then terrible evil happens. Media is full of that message - don't make policy in your own interests, don't be evil. If this great fear of an indigenous backlash were in any way true, surely the systematic rape of indigenous girls by foreign gangs would spark some sort of backlash. People can endure a lot but raping their children must invoke some sort of response. Right? But there has been nothing. Up until 10 years ago, the idea that foreign gangs were systematically targeting, abusing and raping indigenous girls would have been denounced as a racist conspiracy theory. What people like Bubblypop show us is that this was an unnecessary argument. English girls facing English social problems now have the added challenge of avoiding being groomed by men from foreign enclaves created by UK government policy. But this is simply accepted by open border advocates as the new normal. There is no questioning of how this came to be and certainly no acceptance that it could have been avoided by not permitting mass migration in the first place.
Sand wrote: » Well, that is because if a guy groomed/groped/raped a woman in another family in a Muslim country her father, brothers, uncles, ,male cousins etc would take it as an insult against their family and lynch the guy and his father/brothers/uncles/male cousins etc. Or they would die in the attempt.
bubblypop wrote: » Actually, there would be far more expectation that the female would commit suicide. There have been occasions where the Rape of a female has been ordered by elders, as punishment for the crimes of a male in the same family. Victims of Rape and sexual abuse in Pakistan being shame on their family and there is little chance of any family member taking revenge. Over 80% of rapes and child sexual abuse is carried out by family members themselves, fathers, brothers, uncles etc. Rape is a massive problem in Pakistan. I'm not sure though why you named me in your post, or what I have shown?
Deleted User wrote: » First world people often just don't realise how precious what we have is.
Deleted User wrote: » Western culture and democracy are two of the greatest things we have in this world. That's going to annoy some people but whatever...
John_caffrey wrote: » Anyway I am really surprised by the level of hate and propaganda here. .
John_caffrey wrote: » People commenting about rape too in the UK. Seriously? Do the media talk about white and christianity when there is rape every day through clubs and dating apps, and by high ranking politicians and people of power who are even pedophiles? Media is only doing propaganda because they are sending our brothers and sisters to wars and want to make us hate others. Someone also spread the information that they "DONT want to talk about the religion of those groomers" why? they kept saying that because they want you EXACTLY to be alerted to the fact that they are muslims. Even though they aren't religious at all and if they followed their religion, rape is forbidden, sex is forbidden, and they should even avoid looking at body parts and be respectful. But will we ever know who were they getting those girls for? Perhaps they were used by a group of elites... who knows. Anyway I am really surprised by the level of hate and propaganda here. Not shocking that our society is falling apart and we are getting filled with intolerance. Should instead spend time with your families and help each other instead of the toxicity online.
DerekC16 wrote: » African gang ran amok today in St Stephens green. One stabbed.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » Just because there was no mention of race in the article does not equate to it being a lie . The video I have seen on twitter was clearly chaps from warmer climates, involved.