Wildly Boaring wrote: » Construction Different roles depending on the project 90k inc car allowance, plus profit share, few bits and bobs like fuel card, toll tag etc. Honestly I'd make more on the building/construction side but it's not worth it to me. I get no calls after 5 and I've only worked 2 Saturdays in the last 12 months. Love the variety of my role. We provide several services and I'm in the middle of most of them. Also I'm on a building site 4 or 5 days a week and having done the office thing a few times there's no comparison. I've flexibility, open air and a sense of purpose/achievement that i never got in an office despite leading successful projects. Roles..... Construction management Quality Lead Constructability lead / design Review We also consult to some larger entities on the construction phase Do a bit internally on our processes and resourcing.
ebayissues wrote: » I was speaking to a friend yesterday who's on 75K working in risk in finance. He wants to work in a tech company has their package for a junior to senior are over 100k. His gf who works for the tech guys, is on 100+, excluding stock options Relatives if mine, oone in software for a hedge fund is on 180k with less than 45hrs a week. Another in Finance on 80k, and youngest sibling 40k in a data analystggig but she's so clud intthats sshe'll gget tto the topffast . I used to think that 80/100k was good, yea goodbbut could be better. All comes at a sacrifice,friends,family stress. Enjoyllife bbe happy, iit's mmore than money canbbuy . Yes there are people earning crazy money. Keep onhhaving eeyes cclosed aand ears shut and you won'tgget aanywhere . Checktthe CCSO, yyou ccan gget abbreakdown of average wages by occupation
Alkers wrote: » That sounds great, what's your background and level of experience?
corcaigh1 wrote: » 80K?? Seriously? What kind of prices are you getting to make that coin, very hard to clear that money as a self employed wet tradesman. Plumber or Sparks might make it...
salonfire wrote: » Some of the salaries mentioned here are shocking, why are we paying ourselves so much? It can't be sustainable and will cause MNCs to look elsewhere. India is improving all the time in Software and will do your job for a fraction of your salary. Their infrastructure is 1st class in the dedicated cities built for IT companies.
Deleted User wrote: » If you earn over 70k you're in the top 10% of earners believe it or not. Still doesn't get me into a top 10% gaff!
salonfire wrote: » Some of the salaries mentioned here are shocking, why are we paying ourselves so much? It can't be sustainable and will cause MNCs to look elsewhere. India is improving all the time in Software and will do your job for a fraction of your salary. Their infrastructure is 1st class in the dedicated cities built for IT companies. Why would people study their a*se off to become doctors when glorified builders ("site managers") earn 100k+ without a quarter of the knowledge required of a doctor. It causing everything to become far too expensive - look at housing. Ireland is not a rich country, we should be paying ourselves far less and praying MNCs will continue to operate here with competitiveness our main selling point. These salaries don't even cover the cost of Employer PRSI + other employee costs. What could possibly go wrong?
growleaves wrote: » Is this satire? You really think people should bid their own salaries down to stay competitive? Are you aware that when MNCs threaten to jump ship its a negotiating tactic? I'm beginning to think this whole forum is some sort of practical joke. No one who isn't themselves a CEO should be looking for wages to be slashed. How do so many people have Thatchernomics on the brain, I think someone must be tampering with the water supply.
It causing everything to become far too expensive - look at housing.
growleaves wrote: » You really think people should bid their own salaries down to stay competitive?
growleaves wrote: » Are you aware that when MNCs threaten to jump ship its a negotiating tactic?
mloc123 wrote: » We should just be happy to get paid at all.... Don't want to upset the companies that are making millions/billions a year.
billyhead wrote: » It just goes to show a lot of people would be better of doing an apprenticeship or trade than going to 3rd level.
salonfire wrote: » People won't no, so the Government should be preemptive for once and force salaries down, deal with labour shortages by importing temporary labour from abroad to drive down salaries.
costacorta wrote: » Ah but how many of these guys are prepared to get wet and dirty doing a days work . I tell you one thing bring all those office workers with me for one full week and they be damn glad to get back to their cushy warm office jobs.
Smee_Again wrote: » You’ve obviously never had back to back calls all day with no time to take a piss.
salonfire wrote: » When you price products or tradesmen, do you pay the higher price when you can get the exact same for a lower price? Like hell you do.
salonfire wrote: » Why would people study their a*se off to become doctors when glorified builders ("site managers") earn 100k+ without a quarter of the knowledge required of a doctor.
Wildly Boaring wrote: » What are you on about. 1. There is no site manager in this thread on 100k+ 2. Most site managers in this country need to be engineers. You know the guys who make sure stuff doesn't fall down. A quarter the knowledge of a doctor? 3. Believe it or not engineers studied hard too. 5. If there is a site manager on 100k+ they are guaranteed to be managing a project on 70 or 80 million and above.... A wrong decision could cost their boss millions. A right one earns their boss millions. They've probably earned their boss millions over 20 years