oisinog wrote: » You talk about the extra costs but dont discuss the offsets. How much per week have you saved on you commute to work? How much have you saved on Coffee/Tea/Lunch?
irelandrover wrote: » I dont see it as that unusual. Being able to do something and being forced to do something are very different things. I will probably be back in the office 2 days a week when we go back. I used to be 4 days a week in the office with no WFH. It is a change and it costs me money. I dont live in ireland so get paid 19 cents a km to commute to work, and i cycled so i had no expenses. Coffee was supplied by teh company and i bought a packed lunch most days anyway. So now i have to pay for coffee, lose the travel money and have to heat my office. I dont mind as i like the flexibility. BUt i can fully understand why someone would be annoyed by this.
irelandrover wrote: » To see who contributed the most to the thread? Does it matter why you would want to? Its very easy to see how many posts a contributor has without counting them individually.
oisinog wrote: » But its not when you are saying you are more or less taking a paycut. Both myself and my wife are working from home I commuted to work by bike so I had no cost but I childcare costs. Working from home has saved me childcare costs and also reduced my spend on food and coffee (I even bough an espresso machine for home). Using your logic I have had a payrise as I have more money in my bank account at the end of each month.
floorpie wrote: » What you spend in your personal life has never been your company's business. Some people bring lunch from home to work, some people buy it out, some people walk, some drive. So imo whether you're saving or spending more in your personal life by WFH is irrelevant. If you have a business cost it should be covered by the business. E.g. I don't pay for my own flights, hotels and food when I'm abroad for work. Using posters' logic here, I should pay myself because I get the benefit of seeing other countries.
jester77 wrote: » You are free to look for a new job that won't have these demands. They cannot force you to stay.
Allinall wrote: » They also cannot arbitrarily change your working conditions without your express agreement.
ineedeuro wrote: » Once its in the contract they can do what they want
floorpie wrote: » Sounds like you've just solved every workplace grievance. Shut down the forum.
Padre_Pio wrote: » How much have I spent outfitting my office? About 400 euro so far. Needed to buy a desk, lighting, a second monitor, a webcam, extension leads etc. Got a chair, laptop, dock and monitor from work. Lost the use of half my bedroom. How much will I need to spend? Well, I'll probably need to move to a bigger house and rent two rooms, bedroom and office. Or buy a house or apartment.
Deleted User wrote: » Or just book one of the hot desks :rolleyes:
floorpie wrote: » "Your permanent desk is expected to be in your own home"
floorpie wrote: » Just change jobs man. Then change house. Then when your new job moves to WFH, change jobs again. You should also factor in the joy you get from sleeping and working from the same room for 18 hours a day into your package (this is like a 20% pay rise when you factor in all of these intangibles). Boards.ie has it cracked.
oisinog wrote: » So working from your rented home had Cost you 4OO more. How much has your commute reduced?
Mrs OBumble wrote: » The WFH fans really seem to have difficulty with this. And with math: if a company says "everyone must work in the office 2 days/week" and also cuts office space to 40% of current space, then NO ONE is getting a permanent desk. Because if some do, then others will be prevented from meeting the 2 days/ week measure.
Deleted User wrote: » But then it becomes 2nd nature and everyone slots in appropriately. This whole thread is much ado about nothing IMO