newuser99999 wrote: » I am talking about friends that I have spoken to and my own experience.
floorpie wrote: » I can see no way in which WFH is in any way conducive to a better social life overall, please explain how. Obvious reasons: you and your peers/friends/family aren't in a common place every day (e.g. Dublin city centre); your only human contact for 40-50 hours a week is through Zoom; you aren't allowed leave your house for 40-50 hours a week etc. These are obvious antisocial attributes of WFH. I imagine "building a social life outside the office" is perhaps insurmountably difficult if you WFH any distance from an urban centre.
Jim2007 wrote: » Well unless you are a very unusual kind of character, one can assume that most of your friends and acquaintances will be of a similar mind set to yourself.
floorpie wrote: » I can see no way in which WFH is in any way conducive to a better social life overall, please explain how.
KaneToad wrote: » I couldn't disagree more. You have more time for meaningful social interactions with people of your choosing. Sports clubs, neighbours, volunteer groups, music groups etc... The people you work with are foisted upon you (and you on them!). There is nobody that I work with that I would ever socialise with or keep in touch with if I left. They are all (mostly) nice people but we have nothing in common. Also, there is life outside of Dublin city!
Padre_Pio wrote: » Take anyone moving to a new job (you'll probably have to move since full WFH is off the table, only a "hybrid" solution in many companies). Your first friends are your colleagues, your after-work drinks, your company social outings etc. The clubs and groups come later, but they're usually people you only see once a week or fortnight, if you have time for these, with family or other commitments.
floorpie wrote: » I can see no way in which WFH is in any way conducive to a better social life overall, please explain how. Obvious reasons that it's not conducive: you and your peers/friends/family aren't in a common place every day (e.g. Dublin city centre); your only human contact for 40-50 hours a week is through Zoom; you aren't allowed leave your house for 40-50 hours a week etc. These are obvious antisocial attributes of WFH. I imagine "building a social life outside the office" is perhaps insurmountably difficult if you WFH any distance from an urban centre.
Evd-Burner wrote: » I built on office out the back and the job sent a new desk, screens, dock, speakers etc. I have kids at home so a separate office was needed, I can't wait to get back in to the office! I miss having the break away from the house and kids, right now I feel like I am always in the mindset of work and its like I can't switch off from it. I end up checking my mails every night before bed and checking in on things over the weekend. I never did any of this before when I primarily worked from the office, we always had the option to do 20% of our time at home but I only ever used that option once or twice a year at max. I think I will still aim for at least 2 days a week at home in my personal office for focusing and to avoid the some commuting time.
GreeBo wrote: » Yeah, I think at under a year its a bit early to be popping the champagne to be honest.
KaneToad wrote: » I don't have this problem. I have contracted hours. That's all I work. No interest in doing more.
Deleted User wrote: » You do realise the primary purpose of your job is to work, not to facilitate your building a social life? Seriously concerning how many see their jobs first as places to socialise then as workplaces. These are the people whose work performance I'd be keeping my eye on.
Bambi wrote: » I'm not spending 8 hours a day in a building with the sort of people that I would normally cross a motorway to avoid, that's improved my social life.
Mongfinder General wrote: » Good point. WFH does cut out a lot of the awkward interactions that happen in the work place day to day. One guy who is now the head of a department basically told me that he wanted to take me home and bum me on a night out with work. I don't miss that kind of interaction.
Padre_Pio wrote: » It's the people actively discouraging employees socialising
Padre_Pio wrote: » It's the people actively discouraging employees socialising that I'd keep an eye on. Maybe we work in very different industries.
Deleted User wrote: » You do realise the primary purpose of your job is to work, not to facilitate your building a social life?Seriously concerning how many see their jobs first as places to socialise then as workplaces. These are the people whose work performance I'd be keeping my eye on.
swarlb wrote: » Just curious about this. Being semi retired it doesn't really affect me, and having never worked in an 'office' environment, I'm just curious as to what kinds of jobs are these. Are they primarily IT.. or telephone call based. Would it be a thing in the future that at the interview stage of one of these jobs the criteria for working at home would be laid out. How exactly would it work, insofar as you'd need to be monitored by a 'boss' as to if you were actually working the allocated hours, breaks etc. And excuse me for being ignorant... but what is a 'hot desk' ? I ask mainly out of curiosity, but as my children have not yet entered the workplace... is this something they should consider for the future.
[Deleted User] wrote: » for some it appears to be at the very top of their priority list, over and above doing their actual job.
Deleted User wrote: » There's a lot of chancers out there who aren't terribly good at their work and relied heavily on boot licking and back scratching to try and get ahead. They know more about GAA results or Love Island than their actual roles. WFH essentially blows all of that away and exposes some workers for what they are.
newuser99999 wrote: » Nope. My friends aren’t guaranteed to have the same experience as I am just because we’re friends.
Padre_Pio wrote: » Working from home is great. I no longer get threats of rape. You have bigger problems my friend.
Jim2007 wrote: » Well if you are managing so many chancers you know who to blame!
lawred2 wrote: » maybe he enjoys the back scratches
Mongfinder General wrote: » Quite a leap you've made there with that kind of accusation. To be fair to the guy he suggested it and wasn't assertive or aggressive in any way. It's just awkward when being in the same work space.
Evd-Burner wrote: » I miss having the break away from the house and kids, right now I feel like I am always in the mindset of work and its like I can't switch off from it. I end up checking my mails every night before bed and checking in on things over the weekend. I never did any of this before when I primarily worked from the office, we always had the option to do 20% of our time at home but I only ever used that option once or twice a year at max.
Deleted User wrote: » As a rule, when they jump to making assumptions like that it's time to stop responding. They're getting too emotional.