Deleted User wrote: » There's a skill to avoiding confrontation and infractions on boards. It involves identifying who they are and then disengaging. Have a nice day.
Ger Roe wrote: » No officially waived, but certainly ignored by most. Very few companies gave a thought as to how their employees were managing with their non 'office' spaces. This was particularly true of the lauded success of remote learning. Secondary level kids were confined to their bedrooms for up to 10 hours a day (class and homework/study) without a thought for how they were doing it - some were working off phones without desk space, others in totally unsuitable seating and desk spaces, most resentful of the fact that their home was being invaded by school. Personally, I have been working from home since March 2020 and I still resent the fact that what was a spare bedroom is now my office. I don't want to donate part of my limited living space to my employer on a rent free basis (any basis really) and I need the separation of work and life that the formal office situation gives. I hate the feeling of having a tough day at the office (now bedroom) and essentially still being at the office when I supposedly clock off. I don't want reminders of my work commitments being left around the house constantly. It may seem like an advantage for most now... but wait and see what the long term mental effects might be when it becomes harder to switch off - nothing worse that being under work pressures in your own home.
El Tarangu wrote: » I would be interested in learning of any real-life instances of PAYE employees having successfully claimed for any of the above.
maestroamado wrote: » For me there is nothing skillfull about being on A Forum and refusing to grasp the nettle when there are opposing opinions. For me the skill would be to discuss the topic and agree or disagree, the important thing is about being open. Most of the people i hold in high regard i disagree with on some things. That's called life...
Cyrus wrote: » its very easy on the online portal, the amounts you can claim are tiny though, its just about worth the hassle.
whippet wrote: » I can’t imagine the public sector unions will conspire to make it an unworkable situation for their members - which will be a shame.
Deleted User wrote: » Yeah, it's actually remarkably easy to work remotely and effectively when you actually try. There's no sense in clinging on to the past. The times they are a changing.
GreeBo wrote: » Unless you are a graduate, but we dont talk about them now.
Responder XY wrote: » I despise the idea of working from home full time in the long term. It's a horrible experience. I get that it suits some people personally and that there will be days it really does make sense to work from home and get through volume, but I really don't get that people think that they are more productive overall from a work perspective being at home. Most work is collaborative in nature in my experience. I can clearly see that things are taking far longer to get done and getting done less well a year into work from home. Worryingly for me as a team leader, the people who are slipping most in terms of quality seem to be the ones who think they work best from home. There is a space for work from home for those who want it for some of the time. But regular office attendance I think is crucial for productivity and WFH should be an option for a few days a week for those who want it and never a requirement.
Padre_Pio wrote: » Just got word today that work is downsizing their offices and the COVID work from home policy is going to be a near-permanent WHF policy. Basically, the new office will only have hot desks, maybe half as many as there are staff. Employees have to book a desk in advance if they need to come into the office, but your permanent desk is expected to be in your own home. There's uproar from certain people, but the response is basically put up and shut up. Personally, there's no mention of home working in my contract. I was looking forward to getting back into the office and I barely have the space for a desk where I'm living at the moment, never mind a full setup. Anyone have any experience of this? Places like Google and Facebook have said they're looking at similar policies. Any ideas how that went down with staff?
whippet wrote: » Ah come on - that is some over dramatic interpretation of the last year !! The vast majority of people work from a laptop and a note book - close the laptop and the office is closed !!! What reminders are you seeing of your work day that you don’t normally see ?
Deleted User wrote: » When a poster ever puts words in my mouth, I disengage immediately. To me, it suggests either bad intentions or that they're getting emotional and reaching for things that aren't there. I have no time for either because engaging with someone in that state usually means a pointless argument. I appreciate your concern.
[Deleted User] wrote: » There's a skill to avoiding confrontation and infractions on boards. It involves identifying who they are and then disengaging. Have a nice day.
lawred2 wrote: » Ah here I have to say I think you are inventing a confrontation a little bit..
maestroamado wrote: » mods are too strict with the discussions in my opinion...
maestroamado wrote: » I cannot comment on what you say as i have not being fallowing this as i have just passing interest. I do believe that there should be a payment for WFH based on the fact that there be saving on rent of office space. Personally i get into discussions here and i never take any of it personal but unfortunately others do and the mods are too strict with the discussions in my opinion...
Deleted User wrote: » Yeah, I agree. Which is why I avoid certain situations, like above.
Cyrus wrote: » if you are unable to engage with other posters without getting infracted then thats something you might need to address.
[Deleted User] wrote: » As I've already stated, we have recruited graduates and integrated them successfully. This really isn't difficult.
Deleted User wrote: » The fact that you keep responding to my posts, despite me disengaging only proves my point. You are only looking for a fight. I'm blocking you.
newuser99999 wrote: » I can guarantee no graduate is enjoying WFH.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Has a survey been performed that shows 100% of graduates don't enjoy it? Surely there must be strong evidence to back your claim.