ednwireland wrote: » what if the eir fibre stops 200yards from your house, imagine cant be bothered, poor mobile signal. an you have 2mb broadband (on a good day !)
KaneToad wrote: » I think the people who enjoy the WFH option are not the kind of person to work 10 hour days. I'm one of those. I do the bare minimum contracted hours. No interest in overtime.
floorpie wrote: » It seems to me that people with kids, or who have nice offices at home, love it. Personally I'd rather a commute than having to be in my bedroom for 18+ hours a day, and I can't believe companies seem to be segueing into this being "normal" and others defending it
Deleted User wrote: » Our office is going with a hybrid approach on a permanent basis. So I'll eventually meet new starters there. But to address your concern, grads and new starters have already joined us during the pandemic and have been successfully integrated. Like I said, the old world is gone. Firm handshake no longer mandatory. Welcome to the 21st century.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I don't understand people who work long hours. When I see people doing that, I don't see a hard worker, I see inefficiency.
Bass Reeves wrote: » Change is good when you look at any situation you can see a glass half full or half empty. If you are renting and the place you are in is unsuitable look for a place that suits better. Maybe this is the chance to move a distance and buy a cheap one or two bed apartment or house.
KaneToad wrote: » I think the people who enjoy the WFH option are not the kind of person to work 10 hour days. I'm one of those. I do the bare minimum contracted hours. No interest in overtime. I get it that people like going into the office. But I think WFH models are better for balanced regional development and overall social advancement.
KaneToad wrote: » If you can't get the job done in the contracted hours there is something wrong: 1) with you Or 2) with the job
Cyrus wrote: » how do you know grads have been successfully integrated? the proof of that wont come for 3-5 years until they are moved into positions of increasing responsibility. In your opinion the old world is gone, you seem to be happy about it, were you unhappy in the office enviroment?
Cyrus wrote: » true in some cases, if you are someone who works in mergers and acquisitions for example that kind of rhetoric wont get you too far though.
Darc19 wrote: » That's how hot desking works. Many people are afraid of change, but a few months later they wonder why it wasn't done years ago. Covid has advanced change dramatically and it has been beneficial to most people.
Deleted User wrote: » Because I'm good at my job, that's how I know they are integrating well. I interact with them directly through calls, or indirectly through their work. If you can't assess performance remotely then you're not a good manager. I wasn't unhappy in the office, I just thought it was terribly inefficient. I feel vindicated in that belief, because working remotely has opened others eyes to what I saw all along.
Cyrus wrote: » If you think remote working is the best thing for graduates then we wont agree, i personally couldnt think of anything worse if i was back at that stage. And of course you can assess work performance remotely, any ass can do that, especially with the kind if work you assign to graduates. I just cant see how their overall professional or general development is aided by working, most likely, from a bedroom in their parents house.
Cyrus wrote: » this is like the endless cycling / motorists debates in the dun laoghaire thread. can the WFH fans not understand that some people prefer the office, whats it to you? Maybe you like to sit in your bedroom half dressed all day and on zoom calls for 10 hours, good for you, enjoy it.
KaneToad wrote: » A job is a job. You are being paid for your labour.
Deleted User wrote: » I didn't say it was the best thing for graduates, you're just putting words in my mouth now. I think we're done here. When people start pulling this stuff out, it tends to go downhill.
Cyrus wrote: » dont backtrack so fast, you are a firm advocate for wfh, the old world is gone etc, if wfh isnt best for graduates what is then? may as well expand on it instead of running away from it.
a_squirrelman wrote: » We've no problem with you going to the office. It's nothing to me.
Deleted User wrote: » You're just looking for a fight. No thanks.
Cyrus wrote: » no, i am asking you to clarify your position, if you are unable to just say so, no need to invent a confrontation.
Deleted User wrote: » There's a skill to avoiding confrontation and infractions on boards. It involves identifying who they are and then disengaging. Have a nice day.
whippet wrote: » Graduates these days are different to what they were 10 years ago. College students these days will probably never send a work related email in a few years - it would be like showing a graduate 10 years ago a sheet of paper and asking them to fax it to someone. Tech changes, work practices change and communications change - COVID has just accelerated these changes and the challenge is now how to adapt to these changes with the least disruption. You can be sure that the majority of graduates these days would loath the thoughts of having to commute 9-5 everyday to an office on congested public transport and roads for the rest of their working life. Managers need to learn to manage remotely - my boss has been based in Italy for the last 12 months and it has made zero difference to how we interact. I have on boarded 8 new staff in the last year and have only met 4 of them face to face .. and we haven’t encountered any issues.
blindsider wrote: » When did it get waived? I don't remember seeing that in the legislation...maybe I missed it... Do you have any links etc to support this?
ftbman wrote: » You can claim tax relief and other wfh related costs: Heating Electricity Broadband Other vouched expenses where they are “wholly, exclusively and necessarily” part of your work