Flinty997 wrote: » I know a few people including myself that drive not to avoid walking but because they have other trips before and/or work that require a car, and have limited time to get it all done. It's not like anyone would choose to drive 20 mins in heavy traffic to avoid a 10 Min walk. At least I assume they wouldn't.
Phil.x wrote: » No need to justify yourself.
Pinch Flat wrote: » There will be outrage when people living on the coolmine cross realise they can't drive and park in the station. You'd never know maybe people might turn to radical means of transport, like a 10 minute walk instead of driving to the station.
blanch152 wrote: » The bridge will be built following the outcry over the traffic issues caused by the closure of Coolmine crossing. It will be funny to watch.
Larbre34 wrote: » I'd say theres a bit more water to go under the bridge before the Coolmine crossing is agreed and resolved. It will be very problematic.
Phil.x wrote: » Man when will all this building in D15 stop. Roads, rail, bus, amenities are at breaking point and in some cases broken.https://consult.fingal.ie/en/consultation/barnhill-local-area-plan-2017-2023-strategic-issues-paper
Brock Turnpike wrote: » I can't wait to see the traffic this is going to cause in the area.
daymobrew wrote: » Not "blocked" but "scrapped". More info:
ongarboy wrote: » Are the other level crossings such as Ashtown, Porterstown and Clonsilla all to permanently close to motor traffic too to facilitate DART West? I assume the new road to west of Educate Together Hansfield will have to get in place prior to closing Clonsilla level crossing? Porterstown should really be a non issue as there is so little traffic and residents on that road. Ashtown I thought might cause issue as there is a fair population in the Rathborne development impacted by that closure but I don't hear anyone up in arms about that the way Coolmine residents were.
Flinty997 wrote: » At least this way the DART upgrade is not blocked.
IngazZagni wrote: » ...I guess having one less railway crossing point is what people wanted. It’s not what I wanted but I respect the will of the local community. I have serious concerns this will just concentrate more traffic at other crossings. It’ll be interesting to see what the proposed road upgrade options are. Either way please just get on with the Dart upgrade....
Flinty997 wrote: » That quite surprising..
Larbre34 wrote: » Despite all the route selection guff, its just a third lane from the M50 to the M3 in the median. Its a pity it wasn't tied in to the Snugborough bridge works and get the whole lot delivered together.
raheny red wrote: » Instead of starting a new thread.... N3 M50 to Cloneehttps://consult.fingal.ie/en/consultation/n3-m50-clonee-non-statutory-public-consultation-scheme-update-emerging-preferred-option
Bigmac1euro wrote: » Bridge at station court road blockedhttps://fb.watch/5HnwE_hWBd/
Iarnród Éireann and DART+West conducted the first round of public consultations between August and October last year and took on board the strong local opposition regarding the Coolmine level crossing closure preferred option. After a multi-criteria analysis was conducted on all options, taking into account the 900 submissions on Coolmine, the following is now the preferred option.The permanent closure of Coolmine level crossing turning the Coolmine Road and Carpenterstown Road into cul-de-sacs at the train station Provision of a pedestrian & cyclist bridge at Coolmine Station, linking Coolmine Road to Carpenterstown Road As an alternative to the provision of a new vehicular bridge, the existing local road network and some junctions will be upgraded Traffic modelling and road junction analysis has informed the selection of the preferred option. The upgraded road junctions, including change from roundabouts to signalised junctions, are proposed to accommodate the increase in traffic. The junction upgrade solutions proposed are considered adequate to accommodate diverted traffic volumes associated with the closure of Coolmine level crossing.
Former Former Former wrote: » Walking or cycling to local services is great, until you need to bring home a load of groceries, or it's raining...
IngazZagni wrote: » This is the planning dilemma. Provide 300 parking spaces and it's blocked because there would be too much traffic. This development is only a 10 minute walk to the train station. Short walk to lots of local facilities. Modern Ireland doesn't need as many cars. That's why there are about 2 cycling spaces for each apartment. Development looks good. Just need to get them to commit to high quality materials. Edit: I've just been reviewing the documents. Very interesting to see that GoCar have agreed to base 8 cars in the development and this rental car can be used by all residents. Is this something we could see more of moving forward? I think it's a great idea.
Former Former Former wrote: » Build to rent, disaster. 198 apartments, 100 car spaces. Really?