b0nk1e wrote: » I wonder how all the rubbish got onto the halting site, it's a complete mystery how that might have occurred.
Topgear on Dave wrote: » Yeah a very quick google will give another examiner article from a few months ago that gives a few more interesting details.https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-40065686.html "Caretaker intimidated and prevented from doing essential work at Cork halting site" I have no idea what can be done. Go heavy on them and your a racist who wants to eradicate their culture, go easy on them and the place and the kids lives are in ****e.
Kalimah wrote: » There’s a halting site a mile or two from me. One of the loveliest spots in South Co Dublin near the mountains. The place is destroyed. Roofs half pulled off, rubbish and bits of God knows what all over the place. What kills me is that the best of materials have gone into those houses and they’re in bits. If I pulled the roof off my house I’d be left with it. Not these guys - probably will be sorted out by the council if they can get access to the place without being intimidated. The way I see it is- behave like a responsible member of society and you’ll benefit from it. If you don’t want to do that, sort yourself out and stop making life difficult for the rest of us.
TomTomTim wrote: » This is like me burning my house down and wanting the state to come in and build me a new one. We're getting into murky waters when people want the state to do everything for them, including fixing problems they've created themselves.
punisher5112 wrote: » Nutgrove I guess, they burnt one, it was fixed up, they done it again, they as you say took roof off another and stripped it, they have a thing against letting another traveller family in so it will most likely stay that way.... Huge improvement to years ago though as the space they had was downsized, they would burn rubbish day and night, toxic tyre etc.... They would charge for removal, vans go in and burn it or just dump it and council would go in every so often to clean up. If I recall there was 7 or 8 houses and all but 2 were destroyed.
suicide_circus wrote: » I know this is the fault of the state and settled people, i'm just not sure how
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Why can't they name the site? RTE regularly do news items on places like O'Devaney Gardens highlighting dampness, mould and rats, where children also live, do traveller children have special status?
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » hopefully they can rehome the rats no animal should have to live like that:(
KrustyUCC wrote: » RTE now having traveller representative on to talk about the shocking report on the news at 1
Fann Linn wrote: » Listening to the whining here on RTE and no questions being asked re their responsibilities.
Topgear on Dave wrote: » Any comment on the intimidation of the council caretaker that the Examiner also reported a few months ago and that I linked earlier?
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » no mention of parents taking responsibility for their children or their own living conditions either
Immortal Starlight wrote: » Why can’t the group of fully grown able bodied men and women that live in the halting site pick up their own rubbish. Why can’t their children avoid walking in muddy puddles going to school. It’s not rocket science is it.
MrMusician18 wrote: » It was an absolute cop out to not name the site, ostensibly to protect the children's identities. It also meant that we couldn't explore the particular issues that are on the site. Like where the rubbish is coming from, and why the LA isn't able to do is work. Listening to the report on RTE, I was puzzled that Ailbhe Conneely didn't think to ask these pertinent questions and why the LA should be expected to clean up after people? Fair play to the examiner for naming the site. At least it can now be spoken about in specifics and not generalities.
touts wrote: » If any member of the settled community forced their children to live in those conditions Tusla would immediately step in and remove the children for their safety. Yet travellers rights groups claim "culture" as a defence for abuse. We could throw millions at this site and within a couple of months of handing it over to the travellers it would be back to being a cess pool of filth and they would be back blaming the settled community for not giving them enough money. Enough is enough. The only answer is to break up this halting site and force the travellers into houses. But not all in one estate. Scatter them across every housing estate in the country and they will have no choice but to integrate with the rest of society. Then start to apply the full rigor of the law to protect the children.