Das Reich wrote: » Before arriving in Ireland 15 years ago I used to think my country was very americanized. Ireland was long gone and unfortunately many other countries are becoming similar losing their language and culture.
Hamachi wrote: » Not sure I agree with this. I spend a lot of time in the US with work. Ireland and Irish people are distinctly different. Sure, there is a common language and consumerism. However, unique cultural elements like the GAA and Irish dancing are in rude good health. .
Pawwed Rig wrote: » Irish dancing has become more like the US child beauty pageants rather than an actual test of skill like when I was young. When you see girls wearing make up and wigs it is a real turn off. My daughter won't be going near it.
whisky_galore wrote: » What culture? The living in thatched cottages and riding a donkey to Mass culture? Because nobody wants to do that anymore, the country isn't a theme park for tourists. The GAA are doing better than most sporting organisations and the language is being propped up artificially because nobody wants to speak that either. And you can't cajole or force people to speak Irish if they have no use for it.
Purple is a Fruit wrote: » That's a heck of a lot of putting words in their mouth - seems to be a thing on this thread. Now now, don't be dishonest - numerous people do want to speak Irish, but nobody suggested anything about cajoling or forcing people to.
Hamachi wrote: » That’s your decision. Many parents do not agree. If my daughter has any interest, I’ll certainly encourage her to participate. It’s also great to see young boys and men getting involved. The all male group ‘Cairde’ have been going down a treat on social media and with international audiences. Great to see the continued appreciation for a unique aspect of Irish culture.
whisky_galore wrote: » Ah shur I'd love to speak it but *insert excuse here*
crooked cockney villain wrote: » I find it a bit strange that we have sort of frozen in time. As in, if you were to walk around Dublin in 1975 vs 1995 the changes would be staggering. Hairstyles, cars designs, clothes, the city had to my knowledge a bit of a tired, run down vibe to it. Yet if you were to walk around Dublin in 2000 vs now, 21 years later, would it really look much different? Clothes are pretty much the same (albeit more people wearing high end brands, nobody in 2000 would dream of dropping 700 quid on a stupid Canada Goose body warmer), young lads today have different hairstyles might be another, but it ends there really. Aside from smartphones in people's hands, could you really see the difference? I was watching the X Files there the other week, from 1991 or so, and aside from the fact it wasn't high definition there's not much in it that you wouldn't think it was filmed last week, aside from the oversized mobile phones. Compare that to watching, say Only Fools and Horses from the 80's, the clothes, cars, the decor etc it really seems like a different era.
Purple is a Fruit wrote: » when it comes to what you see and hear (clothes, design, music/musical subcultures) .
crooked cockney villain wrote: » ... Yet if you were to walk around Dublin in 2000 vs now, 21 years later, would it really look much different? Clothes are pretty much the same (albeit more people wearing high end brands, .....
Flinty997 wrote: » Looks far more similar to other European cities now than it did back in 2000. Cafe culture, far more multicultural. More people on bikes, Far more image conscious, both in fashion but also fitness etc. The city itself has changed a lot, lots of different buildings.
Hamachi wrote: » Yes. There’s little enough to distinguish Dublin city center from peer cities in the UK and on the continent these days. I enjoyed the more rough-and-ready city back in the early 00s. Everybody seemed a lot more carefree and out to have fun. These days, the city is populated by a substantial amount of poseurs droning on about coffee and wondering where to get the best avocado on toast. A pretty tedious, homogenized urban tribe.
RandomViewer wrote: » Haven't been to city centre Dublin since 2018, was full of skangers off their faces holding empty coffee cups
Hamachi wrote: » I think you’ve mentioned before that you’re Brazilian? Despite the fact that you guys speak Portuguese, I’ve always felt that Brazilians are far closer personality-wise to Americans than Irish people. Hope you don’t mind me saying this, but my experience of Brazilians is that they are open, talkative, but quite superficial. This is pretty close to the personality type of many Americans.
Das Reich wrote: » Nearly nothing in common as we are Southern Europeans culturally. One example for that is that so many men are in jail for killing the wives after discovering an adultery, while in the USA this is more acceptable. Worse thing in Brazil is being called a "corno" (or "cornuto" in Italian) that mean a cuckold. All rest of Latin America have this kind of thing. But again, country got very americanized recently, but still less than Ireland.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machismo
Hamachi wrote: » Yeah, it’s pretty clear you know nothing about the place.
Das Reich wrote: » Nearly nothing in common as we are Southern Europeans culturally. One example for that is that so many men are in jail for killing the wives after discovering an adultery, while in the USA this is more acceptable. Worse thing in Brazil is being called a "corno" (or "cornuto" in Italian) that mean a cuckold.
Purple is a Fruit wrote: » I lived in Dublin in the mid 2000s. Loved it. My perception of it now though is that it's much rougher.
crooked cockney villain wrote: » Actually that is one that is different now. You don't see half as many goths/ rocker types as you did at the turn of the century. That subculture really seems to have disappeared.
orangerhyme wrote: » Good point. I think youth subcultures have disappeared really. I've spoken to people not that old that were mods/punks. Then you had grunge/rave. Skaterkids, goths, emos
crooked cockney villain wrote: » I've watched that documentary on RTE My Tribe and the subcultures from days gone by strike you as oddballs. I'm 36 and the only subculture I knew of was goths and rockers really. Were ravers really a subculture as such? From my experience most working class youth, myself included, were ravers to varying degrees of interest- subculture sort of implies outside the mainstream. Funny thing I noticed in England was ravers are from every socioeconomic background. In Ireland, while there might be a handful from richer areas, the bulk were working class.